Preview

Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Advanced search

Biodiversity and models of evolution

https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2016-3-123-127

Abstract

Summary. The paper discusses the evolutionary impact of biodiversity, the backbone of noosphere, which status has been fixed by a UN convention. The examples and role of such diversity are considered the various levels of life arrangement. On the level of standalone organisms, the diversity in question manifests itself in the differentiation and separation of the key physiologic functions which significantly broaden the eco-niche for the species with the consummate type of such separation. However, the organismic level of biodiversity does not work for building any developmental models since the starting point of genetic inheritance and variability processes emerges on the minimum structural unit of the living world only, i.e. the population. It is noted that the sufficient gene pool for species development may accumulate in fairly large populations only, where the general rate of mutation does not yield to the rate of ambient variations. The paper shows that the known formal models of species development based on the Fisher theorem about the impact of genodispersion on species adjustment are not in keeping with the actual existence of the species due to the conventionally finite and steady number of genotypes within a population. On the ecosystem level of life arrangement, the key role pertains to the taxonomic diversity supporting the continuous food chain in the system against any adverse developmental conditions of certain taxons. Also, the progressive evolution of an ecosystem is largely stabilized by its multilayer hierarchic structure and the closed circle of matter and energy. The developmental system models based on the Lotka-Volterra equations describing the interaction of the open-loop ecosystem elements only insufficiently represent the position of biodiversity in the evolutionary processes. The paper lays down the requirements to such models which take into account the mass balance within a system; its trophic structure; the accumulative (buffering) properties of each ecosystem layer; the multiple interconnections among the ecosystem species; and the restricting impact of the intraspecific and interspecific competition. From this perspective, the use of bio-cybernetic concepts and mathematic tools looks quite promising.

About the Authors

S. L. Podvalny
Voronezh state technical university, Moscow Av., 14, Voronezh, 394026, Russia
Russian Federation
doc. tech. sci., professor, automation and informatics in technical systems department


E. M. Vasiljev
Voronezh state technical university, Moscow Av., 14, Voronezh, 394026, Russia
cand. tech. sci., assistant professor, automation and informatics in technical systems department


References

1. Convention on biological diversity. New York: United Nations Treaty Series, 2001. V. 1760. i. nos. 30690. P. 79–307.

2. Nikisianis N., Stamou G.P. Harmony as ideology: questioning the diversity–stability hypothesis// Acta Biotheoretica. 2016. V. 64. Issue 1. P. 33–64.

3. Rodríguez R.A. et al. Thermostatistical distribution of a trophic energy proxy with analytical consequences for evolutionary ecology, species coexistence and the maximum entropy formalism // Ecological Modelling. 2014. V. 296. P. 24–35.

4. Venjakob C. et al. Plant diversity increases spatio-temporal niche complementarity in plant-pollinator interactions // Ecology and Evolution. 2016. V. 6. Issue 8. P. 2249–2261.

5. Вернадский В.И. Биосфера и ноосфера. М.: Айрис-пресс, 2012. 576 с.

6. Fisher R.A. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. 318 p.

7. Podvalny S.L., Vasiljev E.M. A multi-alternative approach to control in open systems: origins, current state, and future prospects // Automation and Remote Control. 2015. V. 76. № 8. P. 1471–1499.

8. Podvalny S.L., Vasiljev E.M., Barabanov V.F. Models of multi-alternative control and decisionmaking in complex system // Automation and Remote Control. 2014. V. 75. № 10. P. 1886–1891.

9. Cope E.D. The primary factors of organic evolution. Miami: HardPress Publishing, 2013. 586 p.

10. Андреева С.И., Андреев Н.И. Эволюционные преобразования двустворчатых моллюсков Аральского моря в условиях экологического кризиса. Омск: Изд-во Омского гос. педагогич. ун-та, 2003. 382 с.


Review

For citations:


Podvalny S.L., Vasiljev E.M. Biodiversity and models of evolution. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2016;(3):123-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2016-3-123-127

Views: 750


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-910X (Print)
ISSN 2310-1202 (Online)