Currently, the concept of “development”, having passed a difficult way of evolution, is widely spread in scientific circles, government administration, numerous international organizations and political associations. The identification, study and justification of the key properties of the organizational development process, in our opinion, is fundamental and constitutes one of the priorities of scientific research in Economics and management. In accordance with the results obtained during the performed studies, the most important attributes of organizational development should include the property balance, which can be ensured stable operation of the organization. In General, the balance characterizes the harmony and balance system for all its constituents. Methodological basis of the balance as the object of research is the dialectical nature of dichotomous manifestations in the evolving system, which in turn implies the existence of fundamental contradictions. In this article, the most important and common in management theory binary options and also provides examples of dichotomous contradictions that require a balanced approach in the priority areas of activity of the industrial enterprise. With the use of examples and based on the opinion of renowned experts proved that the requirements to balance the processes and elements of the organization as a socio-economic system allows to more adequately reflect the real situation, to compare alternatives and make the appropriate management decisions, to justify and to shape the priorities of the business activities, to minimize risks and contradictions in the formation and implementation of strategic and tactical goals.

organizational development, balanced development of business organizations, property development, dichotomous characteristics of development, balance

1. 1 Adizes I. Upravlenie zhiznennym tsiklom korporatsii [Lifecycle management of the Corporation] St Petersburg, Piter publ. 2007. 384 p. (in Russian).

2. 2 Blanchard K., Vegkhorn T. Missiya vozmozhnogoili kak stat' kompaniei mirovogo klassa [Mission vozmojnogo how to become a world class company] Chelyabinsk, "Ural LTD" publ. 1998. 292 p. (in Russian).

3. 3 Galka V. A Method Of Organizational Development. Materialy konferentsii "Menedzhment segodnya". Izdatel'skii dom Grebennikova. URL: http://www.grebennikov.ru (in Russian).

4. 4 Goncharuk V. A. Razvitie predpriyatiya [The development of the company] Moscow, Delo publ. 2000. 208 p. (in Russian).

5. 5 Druker P. F. Zadachi menedzhmenta XXI veke [The objectives of the management of the XXI century] Moscow, Vil'yams publ., 2000. 272 p. (in Russian).

6. 6 Kaplan R., Norton D. Sbalansirovannaya sistema pokazatelei Ot strategii k deistviyu [Balanced scorecard From strategy to action] Moscow, OlimpBiznes publ., 2014. 314 p. (in Russian).

7. 7 Kovi S. R. 7 navykov vysokoeffektivnykh lyudei: Moshchnye instrumenty razvitiya lichnosti [7 habits of highly effective people: Powerful tools of personality development] Moscow, Al'pina publ., 2007. 205 p. (in Russian).

8. 8 Kokhanovskii V. P., Zolotukhina V. P., Fatkhi T. B. Filosofiya nauki[Philosophy of science textbook. Second ed] Rostov on Don, Feniks publ. 2003. 448 p. (in Russian).

9. 9 Kubra M. Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie [Management consulting] Moscow, Interekspert publ., 1992. 319 p. (in Russian).

10. 10Lopatnikov L. I. Ekonomiko-matematicheskii slovar': slovar' sovremennoi ekonomicheskoi nauki [Economics and mathematics dictionary: dictionary of modern economic science] Moscow, Delo publ., 2003. 520 p. (in Russian).

11. 11Niven P. Sbalansirovannaya sistema pokazatelei Shag za shagom: maksimal'noe povyshenie effektivnosti i zakreplenie poluchennykh rezul'tatov [Balanced scorecard step by Step: maximizing the effectiveness and retention] Dnepropetrovskб Balans Biznes Buks publ., 2004. 328 p. (in Russian).

12. 12Piters T.Dzh., Uoterman R.Kh. V poiskakh sovershenstva: Uroki samykh uspeshnykh kompanii Ameriki [In search of excellence: Lessons from the most successful companies in America] M.: Vil'yams publ., 2005. 560 p. (in Russian).

13. 13Polozova A. N. Strategicheskoe upravlenie razvitiem promyshlennykh organizatsii [Strategic development management of industrial organizations] Moscow, MAI publ., 2003. 464 p. (in Russian).

14. 14Salikov, Yu.A. Systemic-functional management development of industrial enterprises and its tools (theory, methodology, practice) PhD Thesis 08.05.00. Voronezh state technological Academy. Voronezh, 2008.

15. 15Salikov Yu. A. Analysis of scientific-methodological approaches to the study and improvement of management. Voronezh Vestnik VGU, Seriya Ekonomika i upravlenie [Voronezh proceedings of VSU, Series Economics and management]. 2004. no. 2. pp. 179–184. (in Russian).

16. 16Soblirov A. A. Sbalansirovannost' v korporativnom upravlenii [Balance in corporate governance] Moscow, RAGS publ., 2009. (in Russian).

17. 17Shein E. Organizatsionnaya kul'tura i liderstvo [Organizational culture and leadership] St Petersburg, Piter publ., 2007. 336 p. (in Russian).

18. 18Beckhard R., 1989. A model for the executive. Management of transformational change. ISBN: 0-553-26814-7, 259 p.

19. 19Bennis W.G., 1969. Organisation Development: It’s Nature. Origins, and Prospects Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.

20. 20Deal T.E. & Kennedy A.A., 1999. The new corporate cultures. New York Perseus. ISBN: 0738203807, 312 p.

21. 21Huse E.F., 1980. Organization Development and change (2nd edition). Minnesota: West Publishing Co. ISBN: 0324260601, 270 p.

22. 22Miles R.E., 1975. Theories of Managment: Implications for Organization Behaviour and Development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

23. 23Porras J.I., Silvers R.C. Organization development and transformation // Annual Review of Psychology. 1991. no. 42. pp. 51–78.