Preview

Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Advanced search

Project management in the sphere of innovations: interdisciplinary approach

https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-289-296

Abstract

In this article it is suggested a model of organization of project management in the field of innovative projects. The article notes the approach to innovation as an economic-psychological phenomenon, on the basis of which, an interdisciplinary approach to the organization of management in the field of organizing innovation activity is proposed. It is analyzed the content of innovation activity. As the result it is underlined two main stages: the stage of economic creativity, which includes the emergence of the idea and the preparation of the initial plan, and further implementation of the activity with its further adjustment. The first stage begins with the emergence of the idea of the main participant of the process - the innovator. At the first stage, the selection and justification of the necessary resources for the realization of this idea takes place. The result of this stage can be formalized in a clear work plan, the content of the description of resource resources. The second stage is essentially a non-innovative activity, but an economic one. The proposed interdisciplinary approach takes into account not only the economic component and the effectiveness evaluation, but also the psychological features of the generators of ideas – «innovators», innovation activity and institutional environment. The described model includes the hard core of the innovator team, as an auxiliary belt, which includes psychological, technical, economic and legal support services. Particular emphasis is placed on psychological techniques that allow optimizing and stimulating the process of innovation. As the basic receptions of psychological support are noted motivational conversations, creation of banks of ideas, positive reinforcement and facilitation. The proposed model will reduce the bureaucratic burden primarily through the connection of technical personnel responsible for preparing the necessary technical documentation. Secondly, the reduction in bureaucratic burden is possible due to the definition of the most precise timeframe and the criteria for assessing the result.

About the Author

G. G. Minasyan
Stolypin Volga Region Institute of Adminstration (branch of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
junior researcher, Center of psycho-economic researches of SSC RAS, Radishcheva str., 41, 410003, Russia


References

1. Bajbaeva M. H., Markaeva D., Ismailova H. The concept of innovation in education, their classification. Molodoj uchenyj [Young scientist] 2016. no. 4. pp. 744-746. Available at: https://moluch.ru/archive/108/25653. (in Russian)

2. Gubajdullina G.G. To the question of the leading motive of innovation activity. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Serija: Social'nye nauki. [Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after. N.I. Lobachevsky. Series: Social Sciences] 2014. no. 3 (35). pp. 57–64. (in Russian)

3. Gubajdullina G.G., Neverov A.N. Level of organization of the psychological structure of the innovator's personality. Jekonomicheskaja psihologija: sovremennye problemy i perspektivy razvitija Pjatnadcataja mezhdunarodnaja nauchno-prakticheskaja jubilejnaja konferencija: materialy konferencii. [Economic Psychology: Contemporary Problems and Development Prospects Fifteenth International Scientific and Practical Jubilee Conference: conference materials]. 2015. pp. 51-54. (in Russian)

4. Minasjan G.G. Empirical model of psychological structure of innovative activity of a businessman. Jekonomicheskaja psihologija: proshloe, nastojashhee, budushhee. [Economic psychology: past, present, future] 2016. no. 3-1. pp. 157-165. (in Russian)

5. Oksfordskij tolkovyj slovar' [Oxford Explanatory Dictionary] Available at: http://www.oed.com.

6. Shmakov A.G., Kolesnik E.A., Kostareva L.V. The method of brainstorming. Teorija i opyt primenenija interaktivnyh metodov obuchenija v vuze sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Cheljabinskij gosudarstvennyj universitet ; pod obshhej redakciej A. G. Shmakova. Cheljabinsk [Theory and experience of the application of interactive teaching methods in the university collection of scientific papers. Chelyabinsk State University] 2015. pp. 185-198. (in Russian)

7. Javed B., Naqvi S., Khan A., Arjoon S. Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The role of psychological safety. Journal of Management & Organization, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.3

8. De Jong, Jeroen P.J. Entrepreneurial Behavior by Employees in Organizations. 2016. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2721615 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2721615

9. ?ledzik K. Schumpeter’s View on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Management Trends in Theory and Practice, (ed.) Stefan Hittmar, Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of Zilina & Institute of Management by University of Zilina, 2013.

10. Tur-Sinai O.M. Technological Progress and Well-Being Loy. U. Chi L.J. 2016. no. 145.

11. Yesil, S., Sozbilir, F. An empirical investigation into the impact of personality on individual innovation behaviour in the workplace. Procedia. Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2013. no. 81. pp. 540-551.


Review

For citations:


Minasyan G.G. Project management in the sphere of innovations: interdisciplinary approach. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2017;79(4):289-296. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-289-296

Views: 640


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-910X (Print)
ISSN 2310-1202 (Online)