The need to regulate environmental management activities of institutional entities arises when it affects the interests of third-party entities or threatened by the ongoing entity manufacturing practices its own resilience, to achieve the main goal. The complexity and diversity of the forms of socio-ecological and ecological-economic issues at different levels of the economic system leads to the development of many directions and views on the expansion of the management process of these levels (global, national, regional, local) and techniques from rigid-deklorative state before combination with the market. In this respect, the neoclassical economic theory actively generated new analytical ideas and concept that enables to respond adequately to emerging economic realities. So we can distinguish the following approaches to regulate environmental management activities: T. Malthus and D. Ricardo, revealing issues of social, ecological and economic implications of limited natural resources in the context of the law of diminishing effectiveness and the need to regulate environmental management activities. John. St. Mill and George proved to be ineffective in addressing environmental problems in the industrial economy of the type of the imperfection of the institutions of society, justifying the occurrence of crises protohistoric speculation nature's benefits. A. Pigou developed the theory of externalities, which revealed the need for state regulation of the environmental management activities of economic entities, harmonization of individual and social interests. Research I. Kula, F. Khan and P. Samuelson identified a pattern about the formation of the system of regulation nature-safety activities, not only within individual States but also on a global level. R. Crows have shown that the methods of direct state regulation of nature economic activity is not as good as it seems at first glance and so you should not underestimate the role and potential methods of market regulation problems. It is now generally accepted that environmental management activities of market actors only on the basis of the market mechanism of self-regulation is detrimental to the society and should be regulated.The need to regulate environmental management activities of institutional entities arises when it affects the interests of third-party entities or threatened by the ongoing entity manufacturing practices its own resilience, to achieve the main goal. The complexity and diversity of the forms of socio-ecological and ecological-economic issues at different levels of the economic system leads to the development of many directions and views on the expansion of the management process of these levels (global, national, regional, local) and techniques from rigid-deklorative state before combination with the market. In this respect, the neoclassical economic theory actively generated new analytical ideas and concept that enables to respond adequately to emerging economic realities. So we can distinguish the following approaches to regulate environmental management activities: T. Malthus and D. Ricardo, revealing issues of social, ecological and economic implications of limited natural resources in the context of the law of diminishing effectiveness and the need to regulate environmental management activities. John. St. Mill and George proved to be ineffective in addressing environmental problems in the industrial economy of the type of the imperfection of the institutions of society, justifying the occurrence of crises protohistoric speculation nature's benefits. A. Pigou developed the theory of externalities, which revealed the need for state regulation of the environmental management activities of economic entities, harmonization of individual and social interests. Research I. Kula, F. Khan and P. Samuelson identified a pattern about the formation of the system of regulation environmental activities, not only within individual States but also on a global level. R. Crows have shown that the methods of direct state regulation of nature economic activity is not as good as it seems at first glance and so you should not underestimate the role and potential methods of market regulation problems. It is now generally accepted that environmental management activities of market actors only on the basis of the market mechanism of self-regulation is detrimental to the society and should be regulated.

environmental management, ecology, regulation, institute, nature, externalities

1. Lebedeva N.N. Institutsional’nyi mekhanizm ekonomiki [The institutional mechanism of the economy: essence, structure, development] Volgograd, VolGU, 2002. 326 p. (in Russian)

2. Afanasenko I.D. Ekonomika I dukhovnaya problema [Economy and spiritual program of Russia] Saint-Petersburg, Third Millennium, 2001. (in Russian)

3. Marx K. , Engel’s F. Kapital. Kritika politicheskoi ekonomii [Capital. Critique of political economy] (in Russian).

4. Dal V. Tolkovyi slovar’ [Explanatory dictionary of the living great crosscage language] Moscow, 1996. (in Russian)

5. Ricardo D. Nachalo politicheskoi ekonmii [Principles of political economy and taxation] Moscow, Nauka, 1989. (in Russian)

6. Stolyarova I.A. Antologiya ekonomicheskoi klassiki [Anthology of economic classics: T. Malthus, D. Keynes, J. Larin] Moscow, Ekonov-Klyuch, 1993, 486 p. (in Russian)

7. Sy C. Prirodnye resursy kak ob’ekt ekonomicheskoi teori [Natural resources as an object of economic theory. Ecological problems of modernity: history of economic thought] Moscow, Rus’, 2000. (in Russian)

8. Pakhomova N.V., Richter K.K. Ekonomika prirodopol’zovaniya I ekologicheskii menedzhment [Economy of natural resources and environmental management] Saint-Petersburg, SPbGU, 1999. (in Russian)

9. Mill J. St. Osnovy politicheskoi ekonomii [Principles of political economy and some aspects of its implementation to social philosophy] Novosibirsk, Sibir’,, 1993. (in Russian)

10. Marx K., Engels F. Ekonomicheskie rukopisi [Economic manuscripts of 1844] Moscow, Politizdat. 1968. (in Russian)

11. Pigou A. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya [Economic theory of welfare] Moscow, Progress, 1985. (in Russian)

12. Dobb M. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya I sotsializm [Economic theory and socialism. The anthology of economic classics] Ekaterinburg, Delo, 1997. (in Russian)

13. Gudojnik G. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya revolyutsiya [Technological revolution, and environmental crisis] Moscow, Mysl, 1975. (in Russian)

14. Barnet L., Levi I., et al. Economy and environment – problems of the past and present. Izdatel’stvo VGO [Edition VGO] 1991. vol. 123. no. 2. (in Russian)

15. Marshall A. Printsipy ekonomicheskoi nauki [Principles of economic science] Moscow, Noosphere, 1997. (in Russian)

16. Moiseev N. N Natural environment as an object of economic research. Vestnik LGU. [Proceedings LSU] 1980. no. 23. (I Russian)

17. Tisdell C. Environment economics: polities for environmental management and sustainable development. Cambridge, 1993.

18. Coase R. Firma, rynok I pravo [Firm, market and law] Moscow, Delo LTD, 1993. (in Russian)

19. Krasovskaya, I.P. Ekologo-ekonomicheskii mekhanizm rynochnogo prirodopol’zovaniya [Ecology-economic mechanism of market-based environmental management: issues of theory and practice] Rostov-on-don, SKNTs VSh, 2002, 296 p. (in Russian)

20. VorkuevB.L. Tsennost’, stoimst’, tsena [Value, cost and price] Moscow, MGU, 1995. (in Russian)

21. Guzev M.M. Ekonomicheskie problem I mekhanizm ekologicheski ustoichivogo [Economic problems and the mechanism of environmentally sustainable development] Volgograd, VolGU, 1997. 200 p. (in Russian)

22. Shabunina M.I. Sovershenstvovanie otnoshenii sotsialisticheskogo prirodopol’zovaniya [Iimprovement of the relations of the socialist environmental management in the agro-industrial sphere of production] Rostov-on-Don, RGU, 1987. (in Russian)

23. Semin A.A. Ekonomicheskii mekhanizm ekologicheskogo ravbovesiya [Economic mechanism of ecological balance: problems of theory and methodology] Rostov-on-Don, RGU, 2000. 304 p. (in Russian)