Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of fmea analysis (assembly of aircraft tail as-semblies at PJSC VASO)
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2021-2-300-311
Abstract
The problems of improving the quality of technological processes in domestic enterprises due to their high relevance are reflected in numerous publications of both theoretical and practical nature. However, the performance assessment procedures in the standards are schematically not properly spelled out. This makes it difficult in practice to choose evaluation mechanisms and methods. The priority mechanism of improvement of the enterprise's activity in the field of quality is measurement of efficiency and efficiency of the current quality management system. In our opinion, any activity aimed at improving quality should be economically justified at the stage of its planning. The article proposes a mechanism for assessing the cost-effectiveness of using one of the tools of quality management – analysis of the types, consequences and causes of potential consequences of the industrial production process. The purpose of this analysis is to ensure that all process quality requirements with increased risk are met by developing corrective measures to eliminate the occurrence of probable failures. The article provides an example of such a process-specific analysis. The presented mechanism for assessing the economic efficiency of QMS is based on the real financial performance of the enterprise and can be used at domestic industrial enterprises to measure the costs and results of investments in product (work, services) quality management.
About the Authors
Y. A. Salikov
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), professor, economic security and financial monitoring department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
M. I. Samogorodskaya
Voronezh State Technical University
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), professor, economic security department, ul. 20th anniversary of October, 84, Voronezh, 394006, Russia
References
1. State Standard R ISO 9004: 2001. Quality management systems. Recommendations for improving activities. Moscow, IPK Publishing House of Standards, 2001. 46 p. (in Russian).
2. State Standard R ISO / TO 10014: 2005. Guide to the management of the quality economy. Moscow, Standartinform, 2005. 28 p. (in Russian).
3. State Standard R ISO 10014 – 2008. Guidelines for achieving an economic effect in the quality management system. Moscow, Standartinform, 2009. 26 p. (in Russian).
4. State Standard R 51901.12-2007 (IEC 60812:2006). Risk management. Method for analyzing the types and consequences of failures. Moscow, Standartinform, 2008. 36 p. (in Russian).
5. State Standard R ISO 9001-2015. Quality management systems. Requirements. Moscow, Standartinform, 2015. 24 p. (in Russian).
6. Karpikov V. How to evaluate the effectiveness of the quality system functioning. Available at: www.ptpu.ru/Issues/1_00/19_1_00.htm (in Russian).
7. Kokoreva K.A., Chernenkaya L.V. Application of FMEA-analysis for the process "Management of nonconforming products". International research journal. 2018. no. 4 (106). pp. 64-72. (in Russian).
8. Koptev A.A., Pekarsh A.I., Stroykin D.N. Analysis of the efficiency of the processes of functioning of production systems. Problems of machine building and automation. 2013. no. 2. pp. 14–17. (in Russian).
9. Panyukov D.I., Kozlovsky V.N., Aydarov D.V. Modeling FMEA procedure: methodology and strategy. Quality management methods. 2019. no. 7. pp. 30-38. (in Russian).
10. Panyukov D.I., Kozlovsky V.N., Aydarov D.V. Modeling FMEA procedure: structure and functions. Quality management methods. 2019. no. 8. pp. 36-41. (in Russian).
11. Samogorodskaya M.I. The concept of the economy of quality. International research. 2016. no. 4 (29). pp. 273-279. (in Russian).
12. Gilabert E., Fernandez S., Arnaiz A., Konde E. Simulation of predictive maintenance strategies for cost-effectiveness analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2017. vol. 231. no. 13. pp. 2242-2250. doi: 10.1177/0954405415578594
13. Arnaiz A., Konde E., Alarc?n J. Continuous improvement on information and on-line maintenance technologies for increased cost-effectiveness. Procedia CIRP. 2013. vol. 11. pp. 193-198. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.07.038
14. Sabharwal S., Garg S. Determining cost effectiveness index of remanufacturing: A graph theoretic approach. International Journal of Production Economics. 2013. vol. 144. no. 2. pp. 521-532. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.003
15. van Baaren12 I.R.J., Curran R. How to improve operational availability and cost effectiveness using a pragmatic RAMS Value. Air Transport and Operations: Proceedings of the Third International Air Transport and Operations Symposium 2012. IOS Press, 2012. pp. 27.
16. Khorev A.I., Samogorodskaya M.I. The mechanism for assessing the economic efficiency of the quality management system at the enterprise. Proceedings of VSUET. 2016. no. 4 (70). pp. 376–385. doi: 10.20914/2310-1202-2016-4-376-385 (in Russian).
17. Geum Yu., Shin J., Park Yu. A portfolio approach to improving the productivity of services based on FMEA. The Service Industries Journal. 2011. vol. 31. no. 11. pp. 1825-1847.
18. Kimita K., Brambila-Macias S.A., Tillman A.-M., Sakao T. A failure analysis method for increasing cyclicity through a system perspective. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2020. pp. 1–19.
19. Kimita K., Sakao T., Shimomura Yu. Failure analysis method for designing highly reliable product-service systems. Research in Engineering Design. 2018. vol. 29. no. 2. pp. 143-160.
20. Reim V., Parida V., Schedin D.R. Risk management for the functioning of the product-service system. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2016. vol. 36. no. 6. pp. 665-686.
21. Zhang Z., Chu X. A new approach to conceptual product design and service. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 2010. vol. 23. no. 7. pp. 603-618. doi: 10.1080/09511921003736766
22. Smith J.D. Application of FMEA to optimize selection of hazard mitigation measures. Industry Applications Society 60th Annual Petroleum and Chemical Industry Conference. IEEE, 2013. pp. 1-18. doi: 10.1109/PCICon.2013.6666037
Review
For citations:
Salikov Y.A., Samogorodskaya M.I. Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of fmea analysis (assembly of aircraft tail as-semblies at PJSC VASO). Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2021;83(2):300-311. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2021-2-300-311
Views:
658
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
