Application of a computational and experimental method of analysis the complexly stressed state of rubber membranes for effective solutions for their production
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2021-2-230-236
Abstract
The competitiveness of rubber membranes determined by their durability, quality, reliability, including the time required to create. During operation, the membranes undergo complex deformations, as a result of which a large number of potential destruction zones of a different nature arise, which can lead to the failure of the product. The standard test methods used in the development of formulations for membranes involve testing the material under uniaxial tension conditions in most cases and do not take into account the actual loading conditions of the product during operation, which significantly increases the development time of new formulations for membranes. The paper presents and applies in practice a computational and experimental method of analysis the complexly stressed state of rubber membranes, including carrying out simple laboratory tests in a heterogeneous complexly stressed state, which is realized during the operation of rubber membranes, and analyzing the stress-strain state by the finite element method. An inhomogeneous complexly stressed state was realized by forcing the rubber membrane with a spherical indenter. The application of a computational-experimental method for analyzing the complexly stressed state of rubber membranes is considered on the example of a rubber corrugated membrane of an automatic valve of a bag filter purge system. An assessment of the physical and mechanical properties of rubbers in a heterogeneous complexly stressed state was carried out, as well as an analysis of the stress-strain state of the membrane when it was loaded with a spherical indenter, which made it possible to identify the most dangerous zones of the section. The complex use of this method made it possible to improve the resource of this corrugated membrane by thirty five percent in comparison with the standard, while reducing the creation time.
About the Authors
D. V. Kudelin
research and development center Intire LLC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
leading specialist, advanced development department, Sovetskaya str., 81, Yaroslavl, 150003, Russia
T. N. Nesiolovskaya
Yaroslavl State Technical University
Dr. Sci. (Engin.), professor, Enterprise Management Department, Moskovsky Av., 88, Yaroslavl, 150023, Russia
References
1. Reznichenko S.V., Morozov U.L. Great handbook of an engineer. Vol. 2. Rubbers and rubber products. Moscow, Techinform MAI. 2012. 648 p. (in Russian).
2. Kvasnikova V.V., Zhuchkevich O.N. Competitiveness of goods and organizations. Мoscow, Infra-M, New knowledge. 2015. 192 p. (in Russian).
3. Shpak N., Seliuchenko N., Kharchuk V., Kosar N., Sroka W. Evaluation of Product Competitiveness: A Case Study Analysis. Organizacija. 2019. no. 52(2). pp. 107–125. doi: 10.2478/orga-2019-0008
4. Liu L., Jiang Z. Influence of technological innovation capabilities on product competitiveness. Industrial Management and Data Systems. 2016. no. 116(5). pp. 883–892. doi: 10.1108/IMDS-05-2015-0189
5. Shchetinina I.V. The using of digital promotion technologies to increasing the competitiveness of products. ECONOMINFO. 2018. no. 4. pp. 49–53. (in Russian)
6. Lev Y., Faye A., Volokh K.Y. Thermoelastic deformation and failure of rubberlike materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 2019. no. 122. pp. 538–554. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2018.09.033
7. Barghi B., Shadrokh sikari, S. Qualitative and quantitative project risk assessment using a hybrid PMBOK model developed under uncertainty conditions. Heliyon. 2020. no. 6(1). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03097
8. Jamali G., Oveisi M. A study on project management based on PMBOK and PRINCE2. Modern Applied Science. 2016. no. 10(6). pp. 142. doi: 10.5539/mas.v10n6p142
9. Nesiolovskaya T.N., Kudelin D.V. An integrated approach to the design of thin-walled rubber products. Scientific and technical bulletin of the Volga region. 2012. no. 2. pp. 229–233. (in Russian).
10. Khromov M.K. On the relationship between breakthrough fracture indicators and elastic-strength properties of rubbers. Rubber and rubber. 1981. no. 8. pp. 6–9. (in Russian).
11. Gamlitskii Y.A., Koltsov E.M., Veselov I.V. Application of the finite element method for calculating the stress-strain state of massive and safe tires using linear and nonlinear constitutive equations. Rubber. 2020. no. 2. pp. 82–85. (in Russian).
12. Cal? M., Savio F.L. Accurate 3D reconstruction of a rubber membrane inflated during a Bulge Test to evaluate anisotropy. Advances on Mechanics. Design Engineering and Manufacturing. 2017. pp. 1221–1231. doi: 10.1007/978–3–319–45781–9.
13. Li B., Bahadursha V.R.L.P., Fatt M.S.H. Predicting failure in rubber membranes: An experimental-numerical approach. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2018. vol. 90. pp. 404–424. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.04.003
14. Gupta A., Pradhan K.S., Bajpai L., Jain V. Numerical analysis of rubber tire/rail contact behavior in road cum rail vehicle under different inflation pressure values using finite element method. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.100
15. Reznichenko S.V., Morozov U.L. Great handbook of an engineer. Vol. 1. Rubbers and ingredients. Moscow, Techinform MAI. 2012. 744 p. (in Russian).
16. Goswami M., Mandloi B.S., Kumar A., Sharma S. et al. Optimization of graphene in carbon black-filled nitrile butadiene rubber: Constitutive modeling and verification using finite element analysis. Polymer Composites. 2020. no. 41(5). pp. 1853–1866. doi: 10.1002/pc.25503
17. Huri D., Mankovits T. Comparison of the material models in rubber finite element analysis. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Institute of Physics Publishing. 2018. vol. 393. doi: 10.1088/1757–899X/393/1/012018
18. Zhou C., Chen G., Liu P. Finite element analysis of sealing performance of rubber D-ring seal in high-pressure hydrogen storage vessel. Journal of failure analysis and prevention. 2018. no. 18(4). pp. 846–855. doi: 10.1007/s11668-018-0472-y
19. Robertson C.G. et al. Finite element modeling and critical plane analysis of a cut-and-chip experiment for rubber. Tire Science And Technology. 2021. no. 2. pp. 128–145.
20. Keerthiwansa R., Javorik J., Kledrowetz J. Hyperelastic-material characterization: A comparison of material constants. Materiali in Tehnologije. 2020. no. 54(1). pp. 121–123. doi:10.17222/mit.2019.161
21. Keerthiwansa R., Javorik J., Kledrowetz J., Nekoksa P. Elastomer testing: The risk of using only uniaxial data for fitting the Mooney-Rivlin hyperelastic-material model. Materiali in Tehnologije. 2018. no. 52(1). pp. 3–8. doi: 10.17222/mit.2017.085
22. Huri D. Finite Element Software for Rubber Products Design. International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences. 2018. no. 3(1). pp. 13–20. doi: 10.21791/ijems.2018.1.2
23. Behera D., Roy P., Madenci E. Peridynamic correspondence model for finite elastic deformation and rupture in Neo-Hookean materials. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics. 2020. no. 126. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2020.103564
Review
For citations:
Kudelin D.V., Nesiolovskaya T.N. Application of a computational and experimental method of analysis the complexly stressed state of rubber membranes for effective solutions for their production. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2021;83(2):230-236. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2021-2-230-236
Views:
371
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
