Deformation of entrepreneurship in the forestry sector of the economy
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2021-3-238-242
Abstract
The highest level of shadow activity is in the service sector and trade, this is primarily due to the specifics of the activity. However, a relatively small percentage of shadow income in the forestry sector indicates that damage is caused not only to the social and economic subsystems of the national economy, but also to the ecological, natural, and recreational ones, which indicates the high urgency of this problem. Our country, having the largest forest reserves, receives in the form of export earnings from the sale of forest products about 5 billion dollars, while Finland - 10 billion, Canada - more than 25 billion, the United States - more than 15 billion, Sweden - 12 billion dollars. Speaking about the development of entrepreneurship in the forestry sector of the economy, it should be noted that its formation took place in an extremely short time. Reforming forestry legislation has created the foundation for starting entrepreneurial activity in all forms - public, private, mixed. In a little over three years, the problem of leasing a significant part of the forest fund by entrepreneurial structures has been solved. The best and most economically available forest resources were in the hands of entrepreneurs. Of course, the transformation of forestry legislation was carried out not only in the Russian Federation and took place in different ways. The consequence of these transformations were changes in the basic factors of forestry production: economic; ecological; social. It should be noted that along with the changes in forestry legislation in a short period of time, the transformations that took place in the forest sector have caused multiple deformations, including in the development of entrepreneurship.
About the Authors
Y. M. Sokolinskaya
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Econ), associate professor, economic security and financial monitoring department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
E. A. Kolesnichenko
Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), рrofessor, personnel management department, Internatsionalnaya St., 33, Tambov, 392000, Russia
K. V. Chekudaev
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor, economic security and financial monitoring department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
References
1. Fetishcheva Z.I., Nazarenko E.B., Gamsakhurdia O. V. Improving the legal and regulatory framework in the forest sector of the economy. Forestry bulletin. 2014. vol. 18. no. 3 (103). (in Russian).
2. Stepanova Yu.N. Digitalization as a new factor of influence on the development of entrepreneurship in the forestry sector of the economy. Actual directions of scientific research in the XXI century: theory and practice. 2018. vol. 6. no. 7. pp. 409-412. (in Russian).
3. Kolesnichenko E.A., Osmanov Zh.D. Economic security of key sectors of the Russian economy: a structural approach to research. Forestry journal. 2015. vol. 5. no. 2 (18). doi: 10.12737/111993 (in Russian).
4. Pechatkin V.V. Forest sector of the Russian economy: past, present and future. All-Russian economic journal ECO. 2013. no. 5 (467). (in Russian).
5. Kolesnikova A.V. Analysis of the effectiveness of export-tariff policy in the forest sector of Russia in the mid-term period. Economy of nature management. 2013. no. 5. pp. 106-118. (in Russian).
6. Konstantinov A.V. Subject-object structure of economic security in the forest sector of the economy. Socio-economic phenomena and processes. 2015. vol. 10. no. 5. (in Russian).
7. Konstantinov A.V. Methodology for assessing the vulnerability of the forest sector of the economy in the face of climate change. Proceedings of the St. Petersburg Scientific Research Institute of Forestry. 2014. no. 3. pp. 73. (in Russian).
8. Moiseev N.A. Methodology for the formation of a forest management strategy and the development of the forest sector of the economy. Forestry Bulletin. 2013. no. 4 (96). (in Russian).
9. Nyan N.T. The forest sector of the Vietnamese economy: ways of modernization and improvement of state policy. Problems of modern economics. 2018. no. 1 (65). (in Russian).
10. Nazarenko E.B., Fetishcheva Z.I., Gamsakhurdia O.V. The influence of the regulatory framework of enterprises on production management in the forest sector of the economy. Modern science: actual problems of theory and practice. Series: Economics and Law. 2016. no. 5. pp. 41-43. (in Russian).
11. Larson A.M. Democratic decentralization in the forestry sector: lessons learned from Africa, Asia and Latin America. The politics of decentralization. Routledge, 2012. pp. 46-76.
12. Lin B., Ge J. Carbon sinks and output of China's forestry sector: An ecological economic development perspective. Science of the Total Environment. 2019. vol. 655. pp. 1169-1180. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.219
13. Carodenuto S.L., Ramcilovic-Suominen S. Barriers to VPA implementation: a case study of Cameroon's private forestry sector. International Forestry Review. 2014. vol. 16. no. 3. pp. 278-288. doi: 10.1505/146554814812572502
14. Atyi R.E., Assembe-Mvondo S., Lescuyer G., Cerutti P. Impacts of international timber procurement policies on Central Africa's forestry sector: The case of Cameroon. Forest policy and economics. 2013. vol. 32. pp. 40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.12.006
15. Siswanto W., Wardojo W. Decentralization of the forestry sector: Indonesia’s experience. The Politics of Decentralization. Routledge, 2012. pp. 155-165.
16. Appelstrand M., Lidestav G. Women entrepreneurship–a shortcut to a more competitive and equal forestry sector? Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2015. vol. 30. no. 3. pp. 226-234. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2015.1011408
17. Hazarika R., Jandl R. The Nexus between the Austrian forestry sector and the sustainable development goals: a review of the interlinkages. Forests. 2019. vol. 10. no. 3. pp. 205. doi: 10.3390/f10030205
18. Klein D., Wolf C., Schulz C., Weber-Blaschke G. 20 years of life cycle assessment (LCA) in the forestry sector: state of the art and a methodical proposal for the LCA of forest production. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2015. vol. 20. no. 4. pp. 556-575. doi: 10.1007/s11367-015-0847-1
19. Socoliuc M. et al. Sustainability reporting as a mixture of CSR and sustainable development. A model for micro-enterprises within the romanian forestry sector. Sustainability. 2020. vol. 12. no. 2. pp. 603. doi: 10.3390/su12020603
20. Cola?o R., Sim?o J. Disclosure of corporate social responsibility in the forestry sector of the Congo Basin. Forest Policy and Economics. 2018. vol. 92. pp. 136-147. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.04.012
Review
For citations:
Sokolinskaya Y.M., Kolesnichenko E.A., Chekudaev K.V. Deformation of entrepreneurship in the forestry sector of the economy. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2021;83(3):238-242. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2021-3-238-242
Views:
294
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
