Preview

Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Advanced search

Analysis of the russian woodworking industry market

https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2021-3-269-275

Abstract

Woodworking in Russia has not decreased in recent years, the demand for construction and finishing materials made of wood is growing. The wood waste processing sector is also developing: wood chips and sawdust recycling technologies are being introduced at the plants, the number of companies producing fuel briquettes and pellets is increasing. All these processes require equipment. So why is the volume of imports of woodworking equipment decreasing? The high volatility of the Russian ruble directly affects the activity of trade turnover with foreign suppliers. During periods of currency surges, imported machines become too expensive for Russian woodworkers, even Chinese products are no exception. The most serious collapses of the ruble were noted at the end of 2014, in the summer of 2015, in the winter of 2016, and in the fall of 2018. The next increase in exchange rates in the summer-autumn of 2020 will inevitably affect purchases of foreign machines. The deterioration of Russia's political relations with many European countries after the Ukrainian events of 2013–2014 and the constant strengthening of economic sanctions limit trade cooperation. Despite the possible benefits, some Western suppliers are breaking contracts with Russian buyers. After 2014, the supply of equipment from Germany, Italy, Austria, Sweden and Turkey significantly decreased, while the share of China began to grow rapidly. Political and currency problems contributed to the intensification of import substitution. If imports are declining for economic and political reasons that are seen as long-term, the industry must compensate for the resulting deficit. And in recent years, the domestic production of woodworking machines has gradually begun to recover. Although the recovery is not going as fast as we would like, and the closure and bankruptcy of manufacturing companies does not stop, the dynamics can still be called positive. Domestic production will probably continue to grow. The import structure has also changed. In recent years, it has mainly been sawing equipment. There are no strong changes in the structure of imports by type of machine tools, although their percentage varies from year to year, and in different ways.

About the Authors

A. S. Subhonberdiev
Vоrоnеzh Statе Fоrеst Еnginееring Univеrsitу
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor, world and national economy department, Timirуazеva str., 8, Vоrоnеzh, 394087, Russia



E. V. Titova
Vоrоnеzh Statе Fоrеst Еnginееring Univеrsitу

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor, world and national economy department, Timirуazеva str., 8, Vоrоnеzh, 394087, Russia



G. N. Egorova
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Cand. Sci. (Ped.), associate professor, industrial ecology, equipment for chemical and petrochemical plants department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia



References

1. Buglaev A.M., Bokacheva M.P., Sivakov V.V. Investigation of the possibility of reducing the vibration of woodworking equipment. Izvestiya of higher educational institutions. Forest Journal. 2017. no. 3 (357). (in Russian).

2. Abramov I.V., Abramov A.I., Nikitin Yu.R., Romanov A.V. Diagnostics of drive systems of woodworking equipment using fuzzy logic. Intelligent systems in production. 2015. no. 1. pp. 31-34. (in Russian).

3. Kopeikin A.M., Deryagin R.V. Sawmill and woodworking production technology. 2013. (in Russian).

4. Shustov A.V. Analysis of normative and technical documents on the safety of woodworking equipment and tools. Woodworking: technologies, equipment, management of the XXI century. 2016. vol. 11. pp. 280-281. (in Russian).

5. Amalitskiy V. Once again about the safety of woodworking equipment. Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Forest-Lesnoy Bulletin. 2012. no. 3. pp. 145-147. (in Russian).

6. Zavyalov A.Yu., Starzhinsky V.N. Ultrasonic radiation during the operation of woodworking equipment. Forests of Russia and the economy in them. 2013. pp. 43-45. (in Russian).

7. Sakhanov V.V., Fitchin A.A. Woodworking equipment market: state and prospects. Economics of high-tech industries. 2020. vol. 1. no. 2. pp. 63-76. (in Russian).

8. Varshinidze R.R., Karpov V.A. Assessment of options for an investment project for the production of pellets. Scientific Bulletin of the Odessa National Economic University. 2014. no. 11 (219). pp. 53-61. (in Russian).

9. Yakovleva E.A., Titova E.V., Subkhonberdiev A.Sh. Circular Economy in the Forest Industry. Business and Economics. 2019. pp. 59-61. (in Russian).

10. Titova E.V., Subkhonberdiev A.S., Malitskaya V.B., Safonova N.M. Strategy for the sustainable development of the timber industry as subsystems of the regional economy. Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020. 2019. pp. 9119-9125.

11. Gnatush V. Trends of the Ukrainian market of woodworking machines at the beginning of the XXI century. Equipment and tools. 2019. no. 3. Available at: https://www.informdom.com/derevoobrabotka/2019/3/trendy-ukrainskogo-rynka-derevoobrabatyvayuschih-stankov-v-nachale-xxi-veka.html (in Russian).

12. Amalitsky V.V. Woodworking machines and tools. Moscow, IRPO: Publishing Center "Academy", 2012. 400 p. (in Russian).

13. Krivoblotskiy A.N. The functioning of woodworking industries: features and factors of their effectiveness. Economics and production management. 2021. pp. 162-164. (in Russian).

14. Shishlo S.V., Zhuk D.A., Usevich V.A., Androsik Yu.N. Analysis of sales markets for woodworking products and furniture. 2020. Available at: https://elib.belstu.by/bitstream/123456789/33776/1/SHishlo_Analiz_rynkov.pdf (in Russian).

15. Bekenova L.M. Modern development of the main sectors of industry in Kazakhstan. Economy: strategy and practice. 2016. no. 2 (38). pp. 58-71. (in Russian).

16. Ishchuk S., Sozanskyy L. A comparative assessment of intersectoral relations of the woodworking industry: Ukraine, Poland, Germany. Gospodarka i spo?ecze?stwo w obliczu nowych wyzwa?. pp. 43. doi: 10.26349/zn.wsb.w.poznaniu.0090.03

17. Gribkov A.A., Zakharchenko D.V., Kornienko A.A. Competitiveness of machine tool building in Russia. Economic portal. Available at: https://institutiones.com/general/2219-konkurentosposobnost-stankostroeniya-rossii.html (in Russian).

18. Guzhva I., Ivanov Y. Topical issues of providing raw materials to woodworking industry enterprises in Ukraine. Economics. Ecology. Socium. 2018. vol. 2. no. 2. pp. 12-19. doi: 10.31520/2616-7107/2018.2.2-2

19. Bahur O., Nebesnaya A., Azarova N. Study on the competitiveness of Russian-made wood panels in the development of import-substituting industries. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, 2020. vol. 595. no. 1. pp. 012037.

20. Shishelov M.A. Assessing the efficiency of the forest industry complex based on calculation of value added index (Based on the example of the Republic of Komi). Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2017. vol. 28. no. 3. pp. 278-285. doi: 10.1134/S1075700717030133


Review

For citations:


Subhonberdiev A.S., Titova E.V., Egorova G.N. Analysis of the russian woodworking industry market. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2021;83(3):269-275. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2021-3-269-275

Views: 438


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-910X (Print)
ISSN 2310-1202 (Online)