Research interconnection of indices of human development, quality of the urban environment, quality of life and gross regional product by the method of the main component
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2022-1-344-350
Abstract
Currently, the urgency of considering the problems of comfort and life safety of the population of megalopolises and regions is indisputable. Particular attention is paid to the use of various indicators for assessing - the human development index, the urban environment quality index, the quality of life index, the gross regional product per capita and other indicators. The subject of the research is the indices of socio-economic development of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The aim of the study is to identify the relationship between indicators that make it possible to assess the comfort and safety of the living environment, ensuring the quality of life and quality of the urban environment standards and having a priority value for the formation of a high level of human capital in regions and megacities. It was hypothesized that the study of megalopolises using the above-mentioned indicators can be described using fewer factors, since there should be a relationship between the indicators. It is assumed that all of these indicators contain a fairly large number of similar indicators, the tightness of the relationship between which can be revealed by the methods of correlation analysis. Comparison of these five indices was carried out using economic and mathematical methods, regression analysis. Using the principal component method, a statistically significant regression equation was found that describes the dependence of the indicators under consideration. According to the results of the calculations, it was found that the magnitude of the impact of indicators on the change in the human development index is 84%. The hypothesis has been proved that the main factors influencing the human development index change are the quality of the urban environment, the quality of life of the population, and the gross regional product per capita.
About the Author
T. N. Orlovskaya
Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor, economic security department, 2-ya Krasnoarmeiskaya ul., 4 St. Petersburg, 190005, Russia
References
1. Serebryakova N.A., Volkova S.A., Volkova T.A. Human capital of the region assessment methodology. Proceedings of VSUET. 2019. vol. 81. no. 3. pp. 375–380. doi:10.20914/2310–1202–2019 – 3–375–380 (in Russian).
2. Serebryakova N.A., Volkova S.A., Volkova T.A., Shendrikova O.O. The role of human capital in the modern economy and indicators of its evaluation. Proceedings of VSUET. 2017. vol. 79. no. 4 (74). pp. 253–259. doi: https://doi.org/10.20914/2310–1202–2017–4–253–259. (in Russian).
3. Kappusheva A.R. Tendencies of development of the human capital in regions of Russia. Fundamental Research. 2017. no. 9 (1). pp. 184–188. (in Russian)
4. Martin B.C., McNally J.J., Kay M.J. Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing. 2013. vol. 28. no. 2. pp. 211–224.
5. Fitzsimons P. Human capital theory and education. Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory. 2015. pp. 1–4. (in Russian).
6. Achremenko A.S., Evtushenko S.A. Quality of life in Russian regions: politological aspect, method and methodology of measurement. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2010. no. 1. pp. 67–83. (in Russian).
7. Kuznetsov S.V., Rastova J.I., Rastov M.A. Rating Evaluation of the Quality of Life in Russian Regions. Economy of Region. 2017. vol. 13. no.1. pp. 137–146. doi: 10.17059/2017–1–13. (in Russian).
8. Kuznetsov S.V., Mezhevich N.M. New Practices of Territorial Governance in Russia and Quality of Life Management Issues. Administrative Consulting. 2015. no. 7. pp. 25–34. (in Russian).
9. Orlovskaya T. Comparative researches on strategic priorities of Russian megalopolises and global cities. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. vol. 463. no. 3. pp. 032037. doi:10.1088/1757–899X/687/5/055067
10. Okrepilov V.V., Kuznetsov S.V., Mezhevich N.M., Sviridenko M.V. Urbanization processes in the context of spatial development patterns of municipalities in the zone of influence of megacities. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2019. vol. 12. no. 4. pp. 42–52. doi: 10.15838/esc.2019.4.64.3. (in Russian).
11. Kuznetsov S.V., Ivanov S.A. National Priorities for Economic and Social Strategy of the North-West Macroregion. Economics and Management. 2015. no. 11 (121). pp.22–29. (in Russian).
12. Plotnikov V.A., Shamakhov V.A. Strategies of Territorial Development and Quality of Life. Administrative Consulting. 2015. no. 7. pp. 57–64. (in Russian).
13. Gertsberg L. Ya. The Quality of the Urban Environment: Issues of Planning and Implementation. City and Town Planning. 2013. no. 1 (23). pp. 28–32. (in Russian).
14. Orlovskaya T. Research of socio-spatial aspect of economic security of megacities: risk zones and conflict nodes. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020. vol. 753. no. 1. pp. 022083 doi:10.1088/1757–899X/753/2/022083
15. Zelyak E.F., Bogdanova M.S., Luchsheva V.V. Worthy standard of living component of the human development index. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2019. vol. 7 (1). pp. 188–192. doi:10.24411/2500–1000–2019–11398. (in Russian).
16. Fomina E.E. Factor analysis and categorial principal component analysis: comparative analysis and practical application for processing of questionnaire survey results. Humanities Bulletin of BMSTU. 2017. no. 10 (60). pp.3–16. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18698/2306–8477–2017–10–473 (in Russian).
17. Afanasiev M. Y., Kudrov A.V., Lysenkova M.A. Comparison of innovative development indexes in the space of regional differentiation characteristics. Proceedings of VSUET. 2020. vol. 82. no. 4. pp. 340–346. doi:10.20914/2310–1202–2020–4–340–346. (in Russian).
18. Astakhin A.S., Tretiakova L.A. Management of life modelling of regional socio-economic systems. Proceedings of VSUET. 2019. vol. 81. no. 4. pp. 218–225. doi:10.20914/2310–1202–2019–4–218–225 (in Russian).
19. Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation. Human Development Index – 2018. (in Russian) Available at: https://ac.gov.ru/publications? period=-1
20. On Approval of the Methodology for the Formation of the Urban Environment Quality Index: decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 510 r dated March 23, 2019. Available at: https://gorodsreda.ru/documents/indeks_kachestva_gorsredy (in Russian)
21. RIA Rating Media Agency. Quality of life in Russian regions – 2018 Ranking. Available at: https://riarating.ru/regions/20190219/630117442.html (in Russian)
22. Federal State Statistics Service. Russian Regions. Socioeconomic indicators – 2020. Available at: https://gks.ru/bgd/regl/b20_14p/Main.htm (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Orlovskaya T.N. Research interconnection of indices of human development, quality of the urban environment, quality of life and gross regional product by the method of the main component. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2022;84(1):344-350. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2022-1-344-350
Views:
399
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
