Evaluation of barley accessions on the content of antioxidants in grain in the conditions of Eastern Siberia
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2022-2-162-169
Abstract
The aim of the study is to determine the adaptive potential of barley accessions by the total antioxidant content (TAC) in the grain and 1000 grain weight, as well as to analyze the relationship between these traits of barley, on the one hand, and the adaptability indicators of accessions for them, on the other. The object of the study was 10 accessions of hulled barley, which were grown under the conditions of Eastern Siberia in three ecological points: Krasnoyarsk Territory, Republic of Khakassia and Republic of Tyva. The HTC values for these items were respectively: 1.50, 1.25, 0.93. In barley accessions, the TAC value was determined using the Tsvet Yauza-01-AA device; gallic acid was used as a reference sample. According to these two traits of barley accessions, 5 indicators of their adaptability were calculated: the coefficient of ecological variation Cv, the stress resistance index d, the homeostatic parameter Hom, the indicator of the level and stability of the variety PUSS, the parameter of the selection value of the variety Cs. It was found that the highest level of TAC in the grain was characteristic of the Uvatsky and Acha accessions. Biom and Abalak accessions positively stood out in terms of grain size. It is shown that the optimal values of the adaptability parameters and their smallest sum of ranks in terms of the TAC value in the grain were characteristic of the accessions Acha and Biom, and those in terms of the weight of 1000 grains were noted in the same accession of Takmak barley. It was found that the relationship between the average values of TAC in the grain of barley accessions and the indicators of their stability of variety stability indicator and Cs for this trait was positive and significant. The presence of a positive relationship between the average value of 1000 grain weight and the stability parameter Cs for the specified feature was statistically proven. The demonstrated result may indicate that when sampling barley for an increased value of TAC in grain, the stability of the manifestation of this trait under different growing conditions is likely to increase.
About the Authors
V. I. Polonskiy
Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Biol.), professor, landscape architecture and botany department, Mira ave., 90, Krasnoyarsk, 660049, Russia
A. V. Sumina
Khakass State University
Cand. Sci. (Agric.), associate professor, chemistry and geoecology department, Lenina st., 90, Abakan, 655017, Russia
References
1. Levakova O.V. Breeding work on the creation of varieties of spring barley adapted to the non-chernozem zone of the Russian Federation and the prospects for the development of this crop in the Ryazan region. Grain Economy of Russia. 2021. no. 1(73). pp. 14–19.doi: 10.31367/2079–8725–2021–73–1–14–19 (in Russian).
2. Wang Y., Frei M. Stressed food – The impact of abiotic environmental stresses on crop quality. Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment. 2011. vol. 141. pp. 271–286.
3. Derakhshani Z., Malherbe F., Panozzo J.F., Bhave M. Еvaluation of Diverse Barley Cultivars and Landraces for Contents of Four Multifunctional Biomolecules with Nutraceutical Potential. Сurrent Research in Nutrition and Food Science. 2020. vol. 8. no. 2. pp. 380–390. doi: 10.12944/CRNFSJ.8.2.03
4. Dykes L., Rooney L.W. Phenolic Compounds in Cereal Grains and Their Health Benefits. Cereal Foods of World. 2007. vol. 32. no. 3. pp. 105–111.
5. Polonskiy V.I., Loskutov I.G., Sumina A.V. Вiological role and health benefits of antioxidant compounds in cereals. Biological Communications 2020. vol. 65. no. 1. pp. 53–67.
6. Siurek B., Rosicka-Kaczmarek J., Nebesny E. Bioactive compounds in cereal grains – occurrence, structure, technological significance and nutritional benefits – a review. Food Science and Technology International. 2012. vol. 18. no. 6. pp. 559–68. doi: 10.1177/1082013211433079
7. Li A.–N., Li S., Zhang Y.–J., Xu X.–R. et al. Resources and Biological Activities of Natural Polyphenols. Nutrients. 2014. vol. 6. pp. 6020–6047.
8. Serebrennikov Yu.I. Plasticity and stability of spring barley in terms of grain yield and weight of 1000 grains. Bulletin of NGAU. 2020. vol. 2. no. 55. pp. 50–59. doi: 10.31677/2072-6724-2020-55-2-50-59 (in Russian).
9. Yusova O.A., Nikolaev P.N., Bendina Ya.B., Safonova I.V. Stress resistance of barley cultivars of different agroecological origin for conditions of sharply continental climate. Proceedings on applied botany, genetics and breeding. 2020. vol. 181. no. 4. pp. 44–55. doi: 10.30901/2227-8834-2020-4-44-55 (in Russian).
10. Sumina A.V., Polonsky V.I. Comparative characteristics of wheat, oats and barley according to the total content of antioxidants in grain. Bulletin of KrasGAU. 2021. no. 10. pp. 203–208. (in Russian).
11. Singh B., Singh J.P., Kaur A., Singh N. Phenolic composition and antioxidant potential of grain legume seeds: A review. Food Research International. 2017. vol. 101. pp. 1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.09.026
12. Wu G., Johnson S.K., Bornman J.F., Bennett S.J. et al. Changes in whole grain polyphenols and antioxidant activity of six sorghum genotypes under different irrigation treatments. Food Chemistry. 2017. vol. 214. pp. 199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.089
13. Fedina P.A., Yashin A.Ya., Chernousova N.I. Determination of antioxidants in plant products by the amperometric method. Chemistry of vegetable raw materials. 2010. no. 2. pp. 91–97. (in Russian).
14. Shahidi F., Chandrasekara A. Millet grain phenolics and their role in disease risk reduction and health promotion: A review. Journal of Functional Foods. 2013. vol. 5. no. 2. pp. 570-581. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2013.02.004
15. Liang S., Liang K. Millet grain as a candidate antioxidant food resource: a review. International Journal of Food Properties. 2019. vol. 22. no. 1. pp. 1652-1661. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2019.1668406
16. Socaci S.A., Fărcaş A.C., Diaconeasa Z.M., Vodnar D.C. et al. Influence of the extraction solvent on phenolic content, antioxidant, antimicrobial and antimutagenic activities of brewers’ spent grain. Journal of Cereal Science. 2018. vol. 80. pp. 180-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2018.03.006
17. Volkova L.V., Shchennikova I.N. Comparative evaluation of methods for calculating adaptive reactions of grain crops. Theoretical and applied ecology. 2020. no. 3. pp. 140–146. doi: 10.25750/1995–4301–2020–3–140–146 (in Russian).
18. Do T.D.T., Cozzolino D., Muhlhausler B., Box A. et al. Antioxidant capacity and vitamin E in barley: Effect of genotype and storage. Food Chemistry 2015. vol. 187. no. 15. pp. 65–74.
19. Ge X., Jing L., Zhao K., Su C. et al. The phenolic compounds profile, quantitative analysis and antioxidant activity of four naked barley grains with different color. Food Chemistry. 2021. vol. 335. no. 1. pp. 127655. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127655
20. Rao S., Santhakumar A.B., Chikwo K.A., Blanchard C.L. Investigation of phenolic compounds with antioxidant activity in barley and oats affected by variation in growing location. Cereal Chemistry. 2020. pp. 772–782. doi: 10.1002/cche.10291
21. Ehrenbergerová J., Belcrediová N., Prýma J., Vaculová K. et al. Effect of cultivar, year grown, and cropping system on the content of tocopherols and tocotrienols in grains of hulled and hulless barley. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 2006. vol. 61. no. 3. pp. 145–50. doi: 10.1007/s11130–006–0024–6
22. Tulyakova M.V., Batalova G.A., Loskutov I.G., Permyakova S.V. Evaluation of adaptive parameters of collection samples of hulled oats in terms of productivity in the conditions of the Kirov region. Works on applied botany, genetics and breeding. 2021. vol. 182. no. 1. pp. 72–79. doi: 10.30901/2227–8834–2021–1–72–79 (in Russian).
23.
Review
For citations:
Polonskiy V.I., Sumina A.V. Evaluation of barley accessions on the content of antioxidants in grain in the conditions of Eastern Siberia. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2022;84(2):162-169. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2022-2-162-169
Views:
366
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
