Manifestation of threats to the security of innovation activities in the context of post-sanctions transformation of the economy
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2022-3-236-243
Abstract
The level of innovation activity in the Russian Federation can be judged by the number of organizations engaged in innovation activities. Since 2010, there has been a downward trend and in 2016, when the level fell to 7.3% and became the lowest over the past six years, Russian enterprises are entering sustainable growth trends in the field of innovation activity and show a sharp jump in 2017 to 20, 8%, and in 2020 the indicator reached its maximum value - 23%. Foreign policy has a huge impact on the development of innovation in the country, and therefore, the pre-sanction period 2010-2013. showed that inflation was declining, during the sanctions (Sanction period 2014-2016) the inflation rate increased, however, the data of 2016 indicate a decrease in inflation to 5.38% from 11.36% (2016 and 2014, respectively), which indicates the intervention of institutional bodies in economic processes. Impact of COVID-19 on the economy and response measures of state support in the Pandemic period 2020-2022. helped to keep the inflation rate from the beginning of 2020 at 4.91%, and in 2021. Thus, based on the Strategy for Innovative Development of Russia until 2030, we can single out the main areas of government activity: concentration of resources on breakthrough technologies; renewal of the country's fixed assets; implementation of scientific and technological achievements; strategic orientation of systems; promoting the formation of innovative partnerships; activation of innovative activity in order to increase competitiveness and economic growth.
About the Authors
V. V. Grigorieva
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor, economic security and financial monitoring department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
T. G. Sviridova
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
senior lecturer, economic security and financial monitoring department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
References
1. Porter M. Competitive advantage. How to achieve a high result and ensure its sustainability. Moscow, Alpina Publisher, 2020. (in Russian).
2. Shtefan V.I., Shtefan E.V., Lutchenko V.G., Lutchenko T.V. Formation of a development strategy for an enterprise that is part of an integrated structure. Voronezh, VNII "Vega", 2016. (in Russian).
3. Shtefan V.I., Shtefan E.V., Lutchenko V.G., Lutchenko T.V. Methodological aspects of the formation and implementation of the development strategy of an integrated structure and its subsidiaries. Voronezh, VNII Vega, 2017. (in Russian).
4. Ndesaulwa A.P., Kikula J. The impact of innovation on performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Tanzania: A review of empirical evidence. Journal of Business and Management Sciences. 2016. vol. 4. no. 1. pp. 1-6.
5. Hashi I., Stojčić N. The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4. Research Policy. 2013. vol. 42. no. 2. pp. 353-366. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.011
6. Baranenko S., Dudin M., Lyasnikov N., Busygin K. Use of environmental approach to innovation-oriented development of industrial enterprises. American journal of applied sciences. 2014. vol. 11. no. 2. pp. 189-194.
7. Lambert S.C., Davidson R.A. Applications of the business model in studies of enterprise success, innovation and classification: An analysis of empirical research from 1996 to 2010. European management journal. 2013. vol. 31. no. 6. pp. 668-681. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2012.07.007
8. Spithoven A., Vanhaverbeke W., Roijakkers N. Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small business economics. 2013. vol. 41. no. 3. pp. 537-562. doi: 10.1007/s11187-012-9453-9
9. Ahmedova S. Factors for increasing the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Bulgaria. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. vol. 195. pp. 1104-1112. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.155
10. Jia N., Huang K. G., Man Zhang C. Public governance, corporate governance, and firm innovation: An examination of state-owned enterprises. Academy of Management Journal. 2019. vol. 62. no. 1. pp. 220-247. doi: 10.5465/amj.2016.0543
11. Rosli M.M., Sidek S. The Impact of innovation on the performance of small and medium manufacturing enterprises: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Innovation Management in Small & Medium Enterprises. 2013. vol. 2013. pp. 1.
12. Brunswicker S., Vanhaverbeke W. Open innovation in small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs): External knowledge sourcing strategies and internal organizational facilitators. Journal of small business management. 2015. vol. 53. no. 4. pp. 1241-1263.
13. Gronum S., Verreynne M.L., Kastelle T. The role of networks in small and medium‐sized enterprise innovation and firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management. 2012. vol. 50. no. 2. pp. 257-282.
14. Schwab S., Koch J., Flachskampf P., Isenhardt I. Strategic implementation of open innovation methods in small and medium-sized enterprises. Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2011/2012. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013. pp. 141-151.
15. Ren S., Eisingerich A.B., Tsai H.T. How do marketing, research and development capabilities, and degree of internationalization synergistically affect the innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)? A panel data study of Chinese SMEs. International Business Review. 2015. vol. 24. no. 4. pp. 642-651. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.11.006
16. Gërguri‐Rashiti S. et al. ICT, innovation and firm performance: the transition economies context. Thunderbird International Business Review. 2017. vol. 59. no. 1. pp. 93-102. doi:10.1002/tie.21772
17. Archibugi D., Filippetti A., Frenz M. Economic crisis and innovation: is destruction prevailing over accumulation? Research Policy. 2013. vol. 42. no. 2. pp. 303-314. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.002
18. Zhou Q., Gao P., Chimhowu A. ICTs in the transformation of rural enterprises in China: A multi-layer perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019. vol. 145. pp. 12-23. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.026
19. Zhao S., Jiang Y., Wang S. Innovation stages, knowledge spillover, and green economy development: moderating role of absorptive capacity and environmental regulation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2019. vol. 26. no. 24. pp. 25312-25325. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05777-9
20. Liu M., Li M., Zhang T. Empirical research on China's SMEs technology innovation engineering strategy. Systems Engineering Procedia. 2012. vol. 5. pp. 372-378. doi: 10.1016/j.sepro.2012.04.058
21.
Review
For citations:
Grigorieva V.V., Sviridova T.G. Manifestation of threats to the security of innovation activities in the context of post-sanctions transformation of the economy. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2022;84(3):236-243. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2022-3-236-243
Views:
300
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
