Preview

Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Advanced search

The use of algae to create phytosanitary products

https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2023-4-102-108

Abstract

Microalgae and macroalgae have beneficial properties for nutrition, biocontrol, immunity and health, etc., especially in the context of integrated multitrophic aquaculture. Projects to improve the bioavailability, digestibility and pretreatment of algae, as well as those aimed at controlling crops with a high protein content (macro/micro), are growing in popularity. Bioremediation will be available for fertilization as part of a mineral and nitrogen recycling approach improved by the effects of these matrices on soil structuring and nutrient absorption. The advantage of microalgae is that they have a fairly short reproduction cycle (about half a day), which allows efficient production of biomass in large quantities. Microalgae have a wide variety of original molecules in their cells. This biomass is rich in lipids, proteins, vitamins and antioxidants. Microalgae form the basis of the concept, they have caused one of the greatest climatic changes in the history of the Earth. Their metabolism, based on photosynthesis, added huge amounts of oxygen to the "toxic primitive atmosphere of the Earth." The main characteristics of microalgae. Most microalgae are called photoautotrophic or autotrophic. Microalgae are very diverse and about 30,000 species have already been analyzed. This number is less than 10% of the estimated existing total. The most common classes in terms of relative abundance are diatoms (bacillariophyceae), green algae (chlorophyceae), cyanobacteria or blue-green algae (cyanophyceae) and golden algae (chrysophyceae). Most of the research is devoted to finding the best strains. The choice of microalgae species ultimately depends on the available organisms capable of synthesizing target products and achieving yields necessary to meet economic and technical constraints. Therefore, when choosing, it is necessary to take into account the prevailing climatic conditions, especially average and minimum temperatures and the availability of necessary nutrients. The use of algae to create phytosanitary products is a promising and in-demand area of research.

About the Authors

A. A. Derkanosova
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Dr.. Sci. (Engin.), professor, service and restaurant business department, Revolution Ave., 19, Voronezh, 394000, Russia



A. V. Drannikov
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Dr.. Sci. (Engin.), professor, food production machines and apparatuses department, Revolution Ave., 19, Voronezh, 394000, Russia



S. Nshimirimana
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

graduate student, service and restaurant business department, Revolution Ave., 19, Voronezh, 394000, Russia



N. A. Hryachkov
Vornezh State University of Engineering Technologies

student, service and restaurant business department, Revolution Ave., 19, Voronezh, 394000, Russia



L. A. Hryachkova
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Cand. Sci. (Phil.), associate professor, foreign language department, Revolution Ave., 19, Voronezh, 394000, Russia



G. N. Egorova
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Cand. Sci. (Engin.), associate professor, industrial ecology and technosphere safety department, Revolution Ave., 19, Voronezh, 394000, Russia



References

1. Abdulagatov I.M., Alkhasov A.B., Dogeev G.D., Tumalaev N.R. et al. Microalgae and their technological applications in energy and environmental protection. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2018. vol. 13. no. 1. pp. 166–183. (in Russian).

2. Avsiyan A.L. The influence of the daily light regime on the productivity of the culture Arthrospira platensis Gomont. Questions of modern algology. 2018. no. 3 (18). (in Russian).

3. Borovkov A.B., Gevorgiz R.G. Productivity of Spirulina platensis and Tetraselmis viridis using various cultivation methods. Sea Ecology. 2005. vol. 70. pp. 9–13. (in Russian).

4. Bykov A.V., Kvan O.V., Sizentsov A.N., Mezhueva L.V. et al. Development of technology for producing feed products based on ultrasonic influence on cellulose-containing and fat-containing waste. Proceedings of VSUET. 2018. vol. 80. no. 3. pp. 236–242. doi: 10.20914/2310–1202–2018–3–236–242 (in Russian).

5. Shevtsov A.A., Drannikov A.V., Derkanosova A.A., Torshina A.A. et al. Study of a feed protein additive from plant raw materials with phytobiotic properties. Proceedings of VSUET. 2020. vol. 82. no. 3. pp. 65–70. doi: 10.20914/2310–1202–2020–3–65–70 (in Russian).

6. Massot A. et al. Biodegradation of phytosanitary products in biological wastewater treatment. Water research. 2012. vol. 46. no. 6. pp. 1785–1792.

7. Kapoore R.V., Wood E.E., Llewellyn C.A. Algae biostimulants: A critical look at microalgal biostimulants for sustainable agricultural practices. Biotechnology Advances. 2021. vol. 49. pp. 107754.

8. Markou G. et al. Using agro-industrial wastes for the cultivation of microalgae and duckweeds: Contamination risks and biomass safety concerns. Biotechnology advances. 2018. vol. 36. no. 4. pp. 1238–1254.

9. Kumar J. et al. An overview of some biopesticides and their importance in plant protection for commercial acceptance. Plants. 2021. vol. 10. no. 6. pp. 1185.

10. Chaïb S. et al. Allelopathy and allelochemicals from microalgae: An innovative source for bio-herbicidal compounds and biocontrol research. Algal Research. 2021. vol. 54. pp. 102213.

11. Rumin J. et al. Improving microalgae research and marketing in the European Atlantic area: Analysis of major gaps and barriers limiting sector development. Marine drugs. 2021. vol. 19. no. 6. pp. 319.

12. Gwinn K.D. Bioactive natural products in plant disease control. Studies in natural products chemistry. 2018. vol. 56. pp. 229–246.

13. Kalenik T.K., Dobrynina E.V., Ostapenko V.M., Tori Y. et al. Study of pigments of the blue-green algae spirulina platensis for practical use in confectionery technologies. Proceedings of VSUET. 2019. vol. 81. no. 2. pp. 170–176. doi: 10.20914/2310–1202–2019–2–170–176 (in Russian).

14. Buslaev V.Yu., Minina V.I., Torgunakova A.V., Soboleva O.A. and others. Possibilities of using biologically active substances of plants in the treatment of lung cancer. Proceedings of VSUET. 2022. vol. 84. no. 4. pp. 115–123. doi: 10.20914/2310–1202–2022–4–115–123 (in Russian).

15. Kurchaeva E.E., Vostroilov A.V. Efficiency of using the feed synbiotic additive ProStor for obtaining rabbit breeding resources. Proceedings of VSUET. 2019. vol. 81. no. 3. pp. 50–56. doi: 10.20914/2310–1202–2019–3–50–56 (in Russian).

16. Tang D.Y.Y. et al. Potential utilization of bioproducts from microalgae for the quality enhancement of natural products. Bioresource technology. 2020. vol. 304. pp. 122997.

17. Moreira J.B. et al. Role of microalgae in circular bioeconomy: from waste treatment to biofuel production. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 2023. vol. 25. no. 2. pp. 427–437.

18. El-Sayed A.E.K.B. et al. Bio and phyto-chemical effect of Amphora coffeaeformis extract against hepatic injury induced by paracetamol in rats. Molecular biology reports. 2018. vol. 45. pp. 2007–2023.

19. Ahmad I. et al. Role of microalgae in sustainable energy and environment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, 2021. vol. 1051. no. 1. pp. 012059.

20. Suteu D. et al. Challenge of utilization vegetal extracts as natural plant protection products. Applied Sciences. 2020. vol. 10. no. 24. pp. 8913.

21.


Review

For citations:


Derkanosova A.A., Drannikov A.V., Nshimirimana S., Hryachkov N.A., Hryachkova L.A., Egorova G.N. The use of algae to create phytosanitary products. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2023;85(4):102-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2023-4-102-108

Views: 239


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-910X (Print)
ISSN 2310-1202 (Online)