Preview

Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Advanced search

Study of the ability of cultures of rhizobacteria to colonize the root system of sugar beet

https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2024-4-136-141

Abstract

The article discusses the ability of the rhizobacteria Agrobacterium tumefaciens 184 and Streptomyces sp. 3 Colonize the root system of sugar beet. The study was conducted by growing plants in semi-liquid (0.7%) starved agar inoculated with these bacterial strains. It has been shown that these microorganisms can take root and develop in the rhizosphere due to root exudates, which confirms their phytoprotective and growth-stimulating properties. The authors analyze the influence of environmental factors on the colonization process, as well as assess the degree of influence of the studied bacteria on the beneficial soil microflora. It was revealed that the introduced microorganisms do not have an inhibitory effect on the main ecological and trophic groups of the microbiota involved in ensuring soil fertility. It has been established that the colonization process depends on a number of factors, including the composition of root secretions, the ability of bacteria to adhere, the rate of their reproduction and survival in the rhizosphere. The method of assessing the colonizing ability, based on growing plants in semi-liquid starved agar, has shown its effectiveness and allows for rapid primary diagnosis of promising strains of rhizobacteria. It has been experimentally proven that in the presence of root exudates of Agrobacterium tumefaciens 184 and Streptomyces sp. 3 actively form microcolonies on the root surface of sugar beet, starting from 2-5 days after inoculation. The development of bacterial colonies increases by the 14th day, with the highest density observed in the area of the root apex. The results obtained emphasize the prospects of using these strains in agricultural technologies aimed at increasing the resistance of sugar beet to phytopathogens and improving its growth. An important conclusion is the absence of negative effects of rhizobacteria on the natural microflora of the soil, which confirms the possibility of their use as biological products in agriculture.

About the Authors

N. V. Bezler
VNIISS named after A.L. Mazlumov

Dr. Sci. (Agric.), leading researcher, VNISS, 19, Ramonsky district, 396030, Russia



O. A. Fedorova
VNIISS named after A.L. Mazlumov

Cand. Sci. (Biol.), senior researcher, VNISS, 19, Ramonsky district, 396030, Russia



J. N. Saneeva
VNIISS named after A.L. Mazlumov

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), engineer, junior researcher, VNISS, 19, Ramonsky district, 396030, Russia



V. D. Tsomaia
VNIISS named after A.L. Mazlumov

master, junior researcher, VNISS, 19, Ramonsky district, 396030, Russia



References

1. 1 Netrusov, A. I., Bonch-Osmolovskaya, E. A., Gorlenko, V. M., Ivanov, M. V. and others. Ecology of microorganisms. 2016. 267 p. (in Russian).

2. 2 Giller P. Community structure and the niche. Springer Science & Business Media. 2012. 184 p.

3. 3 Feoktistova, A.M. Mardanova, M.R. Khadieva, N.V. Sharipova. Rhizospheric bacteria. Scientific notes of Kazan University. The Natural sciences series. 2016. Vol. 158. pp. 207-224. (in Russian).

4. 4 Shaposhnikov A.I., Belimov A.A., Kravchenko L.V., Vivanko D.M. Interaction of rhizospheric bacteria with plants: mechanisms of formation and factors of effectiveness of associative symbioses (review). Agricultural biology. 2011. no. 3. pp. 16-22. (in Russian).

5. 5 Bezzubenkova O.E., Yukhlimova M.N., Nesterova N.I. Microflora of the rhizosphere and rhizoplanes and its effect on the plant organism. Natural and technical sciences. 2012. Vol. 4. pp. 99-102. (in Russian).

6. 6 Tate III R. L. Soil microbiology. John Wiley & Sons. 2020.

7. 7 Fedorova, O.A., Khodzhibaeva, S.M. Survival of Verticillium dahliae antagonist microorganisms in the rhizosphere of cotton plants. Reports of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan. 2010. no. 4. pp. 89-95. (in Russian).

8. 8 Rzhevskaya, V.S., Teplitskaya, L.M., Oturina, I.P. Colonization of cucumber root rhizoplanes by microorganisms included in the microbial preparation Embiko. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems. 2013. Vol. 2. no. 4. pp. 63-70. (in Russian).

9. 9 Bottomley P. J., Angle J. S., Weaver R. W. (ed.). Methods of soil analysis, Part 2: Microbiological and biochemical properties. John Wiley & Sons, 2020. Vol. 12.

10. 10 Fedorova O.A., Bezler N.V. Antifungal potential of actinomycetes from the rhizosphere of sugar beet. Sugar beet. 2021. no. 4. pp. 29-32. (in Russian).

11. 11 Larikova Y.S., Volobueva O.G. Modern ideas about the ecological and physiological role of root exudates of plants (review article). Leguminous and cereal crops. 2021. №4 (40). pp. 93-101. doi: 10.24412/2309-348X-2021-4-93-101 (in Russian).

12. 12 Shaposhnikov, A.I. Belimov, A.A., Kravchenko, L.V., Vivanko, D.M. Interaction of rhizospheric bacteria with plants: mechanisms of formation and factors of effectiveness of associative symbioses (review). Biology. 2011. no. 3. pp. 16-22. (in Russian).

13. 13 Akram M. S., Shahid M., Tahir M., Mehmood F. Plant-microbe interactions: current perspectives of mechanisms behind symbiotic and pathogenic associations. Plant-Microbe Interactions in Agro-Ecological Perspectives. 2017. Vol. 1. pp. 97-126.

14. 14 Minaeva, O.M., Akimova E.E., Evdokimov E.V. Kinetic aspects of inhibition of the growth of phytopathogenic fungi by rhizospheric bacteria. Applied Biochemistry and microbiology. 2008. no. 5. pp. 565-570. (in Russian).

15. 15 Wheatley R. M., Ford, B. L., Li, L., Aroney, S. T. et al. Lifestyle adaptations of Rhizobium from rhizosphere to symbiosis //Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020. Vol. 117. no. 38. pp. 23823-23834.

16. 16 Han Q., Ma, Q., Chen, Y., Tian, B. et al. Variation in rhizosphere microbial communities and its association with the symbiotic efficiency of rhizobia in soybean //The ISME journal. 2020. Vol. 14. no. 8. pp. 1915-1928.

17. 17 Choudhary D. K., Varma A., Tuteja N. Plant-microbe interaction: an approach to sustainable agriculture. Springer. 2016. pp. 1-509.

18. 18 Santoyo G., Urtis-Flores C. A., Loeza-Lara P. D., Orozco-Mosqueda M. D. C et al. Rhizosphere colonization determinants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) //Biology. 2021. Vol. 10. no. 6. pp. 475.

19. 19 Liu Y., Xu, Z., Chen, L., Xun, W. et al. Root colonization by beneficial rhizobacteria //FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2024. Vol. 48. no. 1. pp. 60-66.

20. 20 Bhat M. A., Mishra A. K., Jan S., Kamal, M. A. et al. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in plant health: a perspective study of the underground interaction //Plants. 2023. Vol. 12. no. 3. pp. 629.

21.


Review

For citations:


Bezler N.V., Fedorova O.A., Saneeva J.N., Tsomaia V.D. Study of the ability of cultures of rhizobacteria to colonize the root system of sugar beet. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2024;86(4):136-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2024-4-136-141

Views: 95


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-910X (Print)
ISSN 2310-1202 (Online)