Application of neural networks in creating hardware schemes of membrane plants
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2024-4-222-229
Abstract
The scheme and operating principle of a membrane unit characterized by separation of polarization layerare considered. Units of this type, in addition to permeate removal, realize separate extraction of the concentrated polarization layer formed on the membrane, and flux core with a lower concentration from the central part of the unit. Analysis of the hardware scheme of the plant with a parallel arrangement of such units shows its insufficient efficiency and low productivity. The main purpose of designing new plants is to intensify the process of separating low-molecular and high-molecular components of the mixture. For this purpose, it is advisable not to mix flows with different concentrations. In order to determine the optimal configuration of the membrane plant to meet the above conditions, a mathematical model developed on the basis of an artificial neural networks was used. The neural networks were developed in the interactive development environment Google Colaboratory in the Python programming language with the use of the PyTorch framework. As a result, two networks were modeled, one of which predicted the dry matter content of the concentrate, and the other predicted the dry matter content of the lean stream.To confirm the results of the developed mathematical model, a program for calculating the concentrations of the components obtained using the material balance was proposed. The results obtained on the basis of the model were used to create the hardware scheme of the plant. An algorithm, a block diagram and a program for calculating the operating time of a membrane plant and the necessary number of membrane units for obtaining a required concentration of the final product are proposed. A certificate of state registration of the computer program has been received for the calculation program. The program interface is described.
About the Authors
B. A. Lobasenko
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Engin.), professor, Department of Industrial Design, Krasnaya St. 6, Kemerovo 650000, Russia
A. V. Shafray
Kemerovo State University
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), assistant professor, Department of Industrial Design, Krasnaya St. 6, Kemerovo 650000, Russia
A. G. Semenov
Kemerovo State University
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), engineer, Department of Theory and Methodology of Teaching Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Krasnaya St. 6, Kemerovo 650000, Russia
P. A. Galjazimov
Kemerovo State University
Master student, Department of Theory and Methodology of Teaching Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Krasnaya St. 6, Kemerovo 650000, Russia
References
1. 1 Gokhberg L.M., Kirpichnikov M.P. Forecast of scientific and technological development of Russia: 2030. Biotechnologies // Moscow: The Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, National Research University «Higher School of Economics». 2014. 48 p. (in Russian).
2. 2 Lobasenko B.A., Semenov A.G., Zakharov Yu. N. Ultrafiltration: Theory and Practice // Nauka. 2015. 204 p. (in Russian).
3. 3 Glossary of Terms //Membranes and Membrane Technologies. URL: http://www.memtech.ru/index.php/ru/glavnaya/terms (in Russian).
4. 4 Maytakov A.L., Yusupov Sh. T., Popov A.M., Kravchenko S.N. Study of the process of concentration as a factor of product quality formation // Foods and Raw Materials. 2018. Vol. 6. no. 1. pp. 172–181.
5. 5 Shafrai A.V., Prosekov A. Yu., Vechtomova E.A. Modeling the biocatalytic method of lipid extraction using artificial neural network // Information (Switzerland). 2023. Vol. 14. no. 8. pp. 452.
6. 6 Torshizi M.V., Asghari A., Tabarsa F., Danesh P. et al. Classification by artificial neural network for mushroom color changing under effect uv-A irradiation. Carpathian J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020. Vol. 12. pp. 157–167. doi:10.34302/crpjfst/2020.12.2.16
7. 7 Ekiz B., Baygul O., Yalcintan H., Ozcan M. Comparison of the decision tree, artificial neural network and multiple regression methods for prediction of carcass tissues composition of goat kids. Meat Sci. 2020. Vol. 161. pp. 108011. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.108011
8. 8 Shafrai A.V., Permyakova L.V., Borodulin D.M., Sergeeva I.Y. Modeling the physiological parameters of brewer's yeast during storage with natural zeolite-containing tuffs using artificial neural networks // Information (Switzerland). 2022. Vol. 13. no. 11. pp. 529.
9. 9 Chen J.D., Zhang D.F., Nanehkaran Y.A., Li D.L. Detection of rice plant diseases based on deep transfer learning. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020. Vol. 100. pp. 3246–3256. doi:10.1002/jsfa.10365
10. 10 Cunha A.F., Caetano N.S., Ramalho E., Crispim A. Fat extraction from fleshings – Optimization of operating conditions // Energy Rep. 2020. Vol. 6. pp. 381–390. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.176
11. 11 Tarafdar A., Kaur B.P., Nema P.K., Babar, O.A. Using a combined neural network-genetic algorithm approach for predicting the complex rheological characteristics of microfluidized sugarcane juice // LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2020. Vol. 123. pp. 109058. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109058
12. 12 Vasighi-Shojae H., Gholami-Parashkouhi M., Mohammadzamani D., Soheili A. Predicting Mechanical Properties of Golden Delicious Apple Using Ultrasound Technique and Artificial Neural Network // Food Anal. Methods. 2020. Vol. 13. pp. 699–705. doi:10.1007/s12161–019–01689 z
13. 13 Lu A., Wei X., Cai R., Xiao S. Modeling the effect of vibration on the quality of stirred yogurt during transportation. // Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2020. Vol. 29. pp. 889–896. doi:10.1007/s10068–020–00741–7
14. 14 Jenkins B., Ronis M., Koulman A. LC–MS lipidomics: Exploiting a simple high-throughput method for the comprehensive extraction of lipids in a ruminant fat dose-response study // Metabolites 2020, 10, 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/ metabo10070296.
15. 15 Ali A., Qadri S., Mashwani W.K., Brahim Belhaouari S. Machine learning approach for the classification of corn seed using hybrid features // Int. J. Food Prop. 2020. Vol. 23. pp. 1097–1111. doi:10.1080/10942912.2020.1778724
16. 16 Asghari M., Dashti A., Rezakazemi M., Jokar E. et al. Application of neural networks in membrane separation // Reviews in Chemical Engineering. 2020. Vol. 36. no. 2. pp. 265–310. doi:10.1515/revce 2018–0011
17. 17 Alver A., Zeynep Kazan Z. Prediction of full-scale filtration plant performance using artificial neural networks based on principal component analysis // Separation and Purification Technology. 2020. Vol. 230. P. 115868. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115868
18. 18 Ibrahim S., Abdul Wahab N. Improved Artificial Neural Network Training Based on Response Surface Methodology for Membrane Flux Prediction // Membranes. 2022. Vol. 12(8). pp. 726. doi:10.3390/membranes12080726
19. 19 Abuwatfa W.H., AlSawaftah N., Darwish N., Pitt W.G. et al. A Review on Membrane Fouling Prediction Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) // Membranes. 2023. Vol. 13(7). pp. 685. doi:10.3390/membranes13070685
20. 20 Chan M., Shams A., Wang C.; Lee P. et al. Artificial Neural Network Model for Membrane Desalination: A Predictive and Optimization Study // Computation. 2023. Vol. 11(3). pp. 68. doi:10.3390/computation11030068
Review
For citations:
Lobasenko B.A., Shafray A.V., Semenov A.G., Galjazimov P.A. Application of neural networks in creating hardware schemes of membrane plants. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2024;86(4):222-229. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2024-4-222-229
Views:
89
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
