The study addresses the problem of imparting electrical conductivity to conventional polymer materials for 3D printing by means of surface modification. Polylactide, polyethylene terephthalate glycol, and thermoplastic polyurethane were used as the polymer matrices. The conductive polymer complex poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) was applied as a surface modifier. The modification procedure consisted of impregnating polymer samples with an aqueous PEDOT:PSS dispersion followed by thermal treatment. Electrical properties of the obtained composites were evaluated by measuring resistance and calculating specific electrical conductivity. Surface modification was shown to increase the conductivity of the polymers by 12–14 orders of magnitude compared to the initial dielectric materials. The highest specific conductivity was achieved for the polyethylene terephthalate glycol + PEDOT:PSS composite and reached 9.26×10^-2 S/m. The conductivity of the polylactide-based composite was 2.73×10^-3 S/m, while thermoplastic polyurethane exhibited the lowest value of 3.97×10^-6 S/m, which is attributed to the structural features and reduced wettability of the elastomer surface. Optimal processing parameters were established as 30 minutes of ultrasonic treatment and a drying temperature of 100 ℃. Dispersion dilution with water was found to reduce electrical conductivity, whereas the addition of organic solvents to the modifier was ineffective. A synergistic effect was revealed when combining bulk filling of polylactide with multiwalled carbon nanotubes and subsequent surface modification with PEDOT:PSS, with maximum conductivity observed at a nanotube content of 7 %. The results demonstrate the practical potential of the proposed method for manufacturing electrically conductive functional components using additive manufacturing technologies.

1. Zhang X., Yang W., Zhang H., Xie M., Duan X. PEDOT:PSS: From conductive polymers to sensors. Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering. 2021. vol. 4. no. 4. p. 045004. doi: 10.1063/10.0006866

2. Huang H., Zhao Y., Cong T., Li C., Wen N., Zuo X., Guo Y., Zhang H., Fan Z., Pan L. Flexible and Alternately Layered High-Loading Film Electrode based on 3D Carbon Nanocoils and PEDOT:PSS for High-Energy-Density Supercapacitor. Advanced Functional Materials. 2022. vol. 32. no. 18. p. 2110777. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202110777

3. Cui Y., Zhang F., Chen G., Yao L., Zhang N., Liu Z., Li Q., Zhang F., Cui Z., Zhang K., Li P., Cheng Y., Zhang S., Chen X. A Stretchable and Transparent Electrode Based on PEGylated Silk Fibroin for In Vivo Dual-Modal Neural-Vascular Activity Probing. Advanced Materials. 2021. vol. 33. no. 34. p. 2100221. doi: 10.1002/adma.202100221

4. Tang H. Research progress on the modification of organic highly conductive polymer PEDOT:PSS. Applied and Computational Engineering. 2023. vol. 25. pp. 186–191. doi: 10.54254/2755-2721/25/20230757

5. Reshetilov A.N., Kitova A.E., Tarasov S.E., Plekhanova Yu.V., Bykov A.G., Sandramorti A.K., Kuznetsova I.E., Kolesov V.V., Gotovtsev P.M. Highly conductive polymer PEDOT:PSS – application in biomedical and bioelectrochemical systems. RENSIT. 2020. no. 4. (in Russian)

6. Abbott J., Ye T., Krenek K., Gertner R.S., Ban S., Kim Y. et al. A nanoelectrode array for obtaining intracellular recordings from thousands of connected neurons. Nature Biomedical Engineering. 2019. vol. 4. no. 2. pp. 232–241. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0455-7

7. Dipalo M., Amin H., Lovato L., Moia F., Caprettini V., Messina G.C. et al. Intracellular and extracellular recording of spontaneous action potentials in mammalian neurons and cardiac cells with 3D plasmonic nanoelectrodes. Nano Letters. 2017. vol. 17. no. 6. pp. 3932–3939. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01523

8. Rozhkova K.S. et al. The effect of structural features of PEDOT:PSS on charge carrier transport. Advanced technologies and materials of the future: proceedings of the IV International Scientific and Technical Conference "Minsk Scientific Readings 2021", Minsk, December 9, 2021: in 3 vols. Minsk: BSTU, 2021. vol. 2. pp. 151–155. (in Russian)

9. Ponomarenko V.P., Popov V.S., Popov S.V. Photoelectronics based on quasi-zero-dimensional structures (review). Advances in Applied Physics. 2021. vol. 9. no. 1. pp. 25–67. (in Russian)

10. Badin A.V. et al. Polymer electrically conductive materials for use in 3D printing technology for products of microwave and EHF equipment. 2023. (in Russian)

11. Aimukhanov A.K., Rozhkova K.S., Abdigaliyeva A.M. Effect of polymer PEDOT:PSS modification on its optical characteristics. Actual problems of modern physics and semantic pedagogy. 2021. pp. 45–48. (in Russian)

12. Yağci Ö., Özdemir O.K. Improving the electrical conductivity and electrochemical properties of PEDOT:PSS thin films by Ca and Mg doping. Polymer Bulletin. 2022. vol. 79. no. 12. pp. 11493–11509. doi: 10.1007/s00289-021-04028-7

13. Farkhutdinov M.M., Fetisov L.V. Materials used for 3D printing in electrical devices. Modern Innovations. 2024. no. 2 (45). pp. 11–14. (in Russian)

14. Lozitskaya A.V., Utekhin A.N., Kondratov A.P. Electrically conductive polymer composites on an elastic fibrous base. Bulletin of Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2023. vol. 85. no. 2. pp. 237–246. (in Russian)

15. Kondratova V.M. et al. Features of electrical conductivity of products manufactured using 3D printing by FFF method from carbon black-filled polymer composite. Proceedings of the Tula State University. Technical Sciences. 2023. no. 11. pp. 688–693. (in Russian)

16. Kablov E.N. et al. Application of functional and adaptive materials obtained by 3D printing (review). Proceedings of VIAM. 2022. no. 2 (108). pp. 32–51. (in Russian)

17. Mahato S.K. et al. Material selection considerations for 3D printing of electrically conductive polymer composites: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2024. vol. 113. pp. 25–32.

18. Yuk H., Lu B., Lin S. et al. 3D printing of conducting polymers. Nature Communications. 2020. vol. 11. no. 1. p. 1604.

19. Tran C.M., Yue Z., Qin C. et al. 3D Printing of Conducting Polymer Hydrogels for Electrostimulation‐Assisted Tissue Engineering. Advanced Materials. 2025. vol. 37. no. 36. p. 2507779.

20. Distler T., Boccaccini A.R. 3D printing of electrically conductive hydrogels for tissue engineering and biosensors–A review. Acta Biomaterialia. 2020. vol. 101. pp. 1–13.

21. Li J., Cao J., Lu B. et al. 3D-printed PEDOT: PSS for soft robotics. Nature Reviews Materials. 2023. vol. 8. no. 9. pp. 604–622.

22.