The development of the food industry in combination with a change in the structure of nutrition and energy consumption of the body led to the creation of new directions. So, to solve the problems of reducing losses from socially significant diseases, personalized nutrition can be used. In particular, in personalized nutrition, food additives (PD) can be used as food enrichers that give them functional properties. Biologically active food additives can be considered as independent products that activate certain processes in the body, having regulatory properties. The article is devoted to the prospects in the field of creating food additives and biologically active food additives for personalized nutrition. The study applied theoretical research methods (meta-analysis) based on PRISMA. The selection of scientific achievements was carried out on the Google Scholar platform for search queries "omix approaches," "food additives," "promising technologies," "application efficiency," "personalized nutrition" with a time span of 5 years from 2020 to 2024. It was revealed that research is underway both in relation to the effect of food additives and dietary supplements and their components on focus groups (for example, athletes), and laboratory animals. Separate studies are devoted to the effect of technological steps on the effectiveness of the biological activity of the product. According to existing ideas, the following can be included in the scheme of the stages of development of food additives and dietary supplements: the choice of target pathology; target effect of the developed product; concretizing the selected effect; selection of a nutraceutical candidate; selection of the best combination; conducting bioavailability studies; animal testing; human testing to establish dosage; determination of shelf life. Omix approaches can be applied at the stage of choosing the target pathology (through the marker gene), with which the developed supplement will work. Omix approaches in order to implement personalized nutrition can change the structure of the development of supplement technologies, used for the evidence base of the effectiveness and safety of supplements, excluding testing on animals with the chosen preventive effect.

1. El-Saadony M. T., Yang T., Korma S. A., Sitohy M. et al. Impacts of turmeric and its principal bioactive curcumin on human health: Pharmaceutical, medicinal, and food applications: A comprehensive review. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2023. no. 9. p. 1040259. doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.1040259

2. Ganesan K., Du B., Chen, J. Effects and mechanisms of dietary bioactive compounds on breast cancer prevention. Pharmacological Research. 2022. no. 178. p. 105974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105974

3. James Stubbs R., Horgan G., Robinson E., Hopkins M. et al. Diet composition and energy intake in humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 2023. no. 378(1888). p. 20220449. doi:10.1098/rstb.2022.0449

4. Joshi T., Deepa P.R., Sharma P.K. Effect of different proportions of phenolics on antioxidant potential: Pointers for bioactive Synergy/Antagonism in foods and nutraceuticals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. India Section B: Biological Sciences. 2022. no. 92(4). pp. 939-946. doi:10.1007/s40011-022-01396-6

5. Berillo D., Ermukhambetova A. The review of oral adsorbents and their properties. Adsorption. 2024. no. 30(6). pp. 1505-1527. doi:10.1007/s10450-024-00515-1

6. Bortolini D.G., Maciel G.M., Fernandes I.D.A.A., Pedro A.C. et al. Functional properties of bioactive compounds from Spirulina spp.: Current status and future trends. Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences. 2022. no 5. p. 100134. doi:10.1016/j.fochms.2022.100134

7. Shyam S., Lee K. X., Tan A.S.W., Khoo T.A. et al. Effect of personalized nutrition on dietary, physical activity, and health outcomes: a systematic review of randomized trials. Nutrients. 2022. no. 14(19). p. 4104. doi:10.3390/nu14194104

8. Chen X., Zhang J., Yin N., Wele P. et al. Resveratrol in disease prevention and health promotion: A role of the gut microbiome. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2024. no. 64(17) pp. 5878-5895. doi:10.1080/10408398.2022.2159921

9. Jaskulski S., Nuszbaum C., Michels, K.B. Components, prospects and challenges of personalized prevention. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023. no. 11. p. 1075076. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1075076

10. Mecca M., Sichetti M., Giuseffi M., Giglio E. et al. Synergic Role of Dietary Bioactive Compounds in Breast Cancer Chemoprevention and Combination Therapies. Nutrients. 2024. no. 16(12). p. 1883. doi:10.3390/nu16121883

11. Pandey D., Nandave M., Kumar A. Pharmacovigilance System in the USA. In Pharmacovigilance Essentials: Advances. Challenges and Global Perspectives. 2024. pp. 183-197. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-99-8949-2_9

12. Pandey H., Tang D.W., Wong S. H., Lal D. Gut microbiota in colorectal cancer: biological role and therapeutic opportunities. Cancers. 2023. no. 15(3). p. 866. doi:10.3390/cancers15030866

13. Thomas M.S., Blesso C.N., Calle M.C., Chun O.K. et al. Dietary influences on gut microbiota with a focus on metabolic syndrome. Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders. 2022. no. 20(8). pp. 429-439. doi:10.1089/met.2021.0131

14. Ugwu E.I., Karri R.R., Nnaji C.C., John J. et al. Application of green nanocomposites in removal of toxic chemicals, heavy metals, radioactive materials, and pesticides from aquatic water bodies. In Sustainable Nanotechnology for Environmental Remediation. 2022. pp. 321-346. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-824547-7.00018-7

15. Mikhalovsky S., Voytko A., Demchenko V., Demchenko, P. Enterosorption in the treatment of heavy metal poisoning. Chemistry Journal of Moldova. 2021. no. 16(2). pp. 9-27. doi:10.19261/cjm.2021.852

16. Muela-Molina C., Perelló-Oliver S., García-Arranz A. False and misleading health-related claims in food supplements on Spanish radio: an analysis from a European Regulatory Framework. Public Health Nutrition. 2021. no. 24(15). pp. 5156-5165. doi:10.1017/S1368980021002007

17. Volobuev, A., Romanchuk, N., & Bulgakova, S. Brain Neurogenetics: Human Sleep and Longevity. Bulletin of Science and Practice. 2021. no. 7(3). pp. 93-135. doi:10.33619/2414-2948/64/12 (in Russian)

18. Kovalenko E., Vergasova E., Shoshina O., Popov I. et al. Lactase deficiency in Russia: multiethnic genetic study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2023. no. 77(8). pp. 803-810. doi: 10.1038/s41430-023-01294-8

19. Morgunova E.M. Scientific and methodological approaches to the creation of the concept of personalized nutrition. Food industry: science and technology. 2020. no. 13(2). pp. 6-13. (in Russian).

20. O'Dea R.E., Lagisz M., Jennions M.D., Koricheva J. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension. Biological Reviews. 2021. no. 96(5). pp. 1695-1722. doi:10.1111/brv.12721

21. Sarkis-Onofre R., Catalá-López F., Aromataris E., Lockwood, C. How to properly use the PRISMA Statement // Systematic Reviews. 2021. № 10. P. 1-3. doi:10.1186/s13643-021-01671-z

22. Lin S., Agger J.W., Wilkens C., Meyer, A.S. Feruloylated arabinoxylan and oligosaccharides: chemistry, nutritional functions, and options for enzymatic modification. Annual review of food science and technology. 2021. no. 12(1). pp. 331-354. doi:10.1146/annurev-food-032818-121443

23. Polo A., Albiac M.A., Da Ros A., Ardèvol V.N. et al. The Effect of Hydrolyzed and Fermented Arabinoxylan-Oligo Saccharides (AXOS) Intake on the Middle-Term Gut Microbiome Modulation and Its Metabolic Answer. Nutrients. 2023. no. 15(3). p. 590. doi:10.3390/nu15030590

24. Nie Q., Hu J., Chen H., Geng F., Nie, S. Arabinoxylan ameliorates type 2 diabetes by regulating the gut microbiota and metabolites. Food Chemistry. 2022. no. 371. p. 131106. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131106

25. Slavova-Kazakova A., Janiak M.A., Sulewska K., Kancheva V.D., Karamać M. Synergistic, additive, and antagonistic antioxidant effects in the mixtures of curcumin with (−)-epicatechin and with a green tea fraction containing (−)-epicatechin. Food Chemistry. 2021. no. 360. p. 129994. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129994

26. Quaglio A.E.V., Grillo T.G., De Oliveira E.C.S., Di Stasi L.C., Sassaki, L.Y. Gut microbiota, inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer. World journal of gastroenterology. 2022. no. 28(30). p.4053. doi:10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4053

27. Roux A., Cholerton R., Sicsic J., Moumjid N. et al. Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening”(MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial. BMC cancer.2022. no. 22(1). p.507. doi:10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6

28. Das A., Bhattacharya S., Jawed J.J. Enzymatically Digested Garlic Waste Conserved Most of Its Polyphenols and Contributed to Nrf2 Activation: Bio-accessibility, Bioactivity, Gene Expression, and Genotoxicity Analysis. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2024. pp. 1-28. doi:10.1007/s12649-024-02476-6

29. Zhao R., Qiu Z., Bai X., Xiang L. et al. Digestive properties and prebiotic activity of garlic saccharides with different-molecular-weight obtained by acidolysis. Current Research in Food Science. 2022. no. 5. pp. 2033-2044. doi:10.1016/j.crfs.2022.10.022

30. Kamiloglu S., Tomas M., Ozdal T., Capanoglu E. Effect of food matrix on the content and bioavailability of flavonoids. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2021. no. 117. pp. 15-33. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2020.10.030

31. Li L., Li D. Inter-individual variability and non-linear dose-response relationship in assessing human health impact from chemicals in lca: addressing uncertainties in exposure and toxicological susceptibility. Frontiers in Sustainability. 2021. no. 2. p. 648138. doi:10.3389/frsus.2021.648138

32. Shahidi F., Pan Y. Influence of food matrix and food processing on the chemical interaction and bioaccessibility of dietary phytochemicals: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2022. no. 62(23). pp. 6421-6445. doi:10.1080/10408398.2021.1901650

33. Alieozaman Md S, Chwdhury M., Fatima A., DevM. An overview of spices and herbs as natural antioxidant sources. Journal of Current Research in Food Science. 2024. no. 5(1). pp. 31-35. doi: 10.22271/foodsci.2024.v5.i1a.119

34. Malsagova K.A., Kopylov A.T., Stepanov A A., Enikeev D.V. et al. Molecular profiling of athletes performing high-intensity exercises in extreme environments. Sports. 2023. no. 11(2). p. 36. doi:10.3390/sports11020036

35. Chen R., Pearson V., Suebkinorn O., Bulto L. N. et al. Impact of Genetic Risk Information for Cardiovascular Disease on Behavioural, Psychological Responses, and Risk Factor Modification: A Systematic Review. European journal of preventive cardiology. 2024. no. 00. pp. 1-11. doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwae362

36. Guo L., Cao J., Hou J., Li Y. et al. Sex specific molecular networks and key drivers of Alzheimer’s disease. Molecular neurodegeneration. 2023. no. 18(1). p. 39. doi:10.1186/s13024-023-00624-5

37. Hood L. Adventures Leading to a Paradigm Shift in Healthcare: Advances in sequencing, big data technology, systems biology, and blood analysis open new paths to wellness. Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News. 2021.no. 41(10). pp. 48-50. doi:10.1089/gen.41.10.16

38. Marcos-Zambrano L.J., López-Molina V.M., Bakir-Gungor B., Frohme M. et al. A toolbox of machine learning software to support microbiome analysis. Frontiers in microbiology. 2023. no. 14. P. 1250806. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1250806

39. Karatas M., Eriskin L., Deveci M., Pamucar D., Garg H. Big Data for Healthcare Industry 4.0: Applications, challenges and future perspectives. Expert Systems with Applications. 2022. no. 200. p. 116912. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116912

40. Ma Z., Zuo T., Frey N., Rangrez, A.Y. A systematic framework for understanding the microbiome in human health and disease: from basic principles to clinical translation. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2024. no. 9(1). p. 237. doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01946-6.

41. Kundu P., Beura S., Mondal S., Das A. K., Ghosh A. Machine learning for the advancement of genome-scale metabolic modeling. Biotechnology Advances. 2024. T. 74. p. 108400. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2024.108400

42. Park S.H., Choi H.K., Park J.H., Hwang, J.T. Current insights into genome-based personalized nutrition technology: a patent review. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2024. no 11. p. 1346144. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1346144

43. Sudhakar P., Verstockt B., Cremer J., Verstockt S. et al. Understanding the molecular drivers of disease heterogeneity in Crohn’s disease using multi-omic data integration and network analysis. Inflammatory bowel diseases. 2021. no. 27(6). pp. 870-886. doi:10.1093/ibd/izaa281/

44. Wu S., Chen D., Snyder, M.P. Network biology bridges the gaps between quantitative genetics and multi-omics to map complex diseases. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 2022. no. 66. p. 102101. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.102101

45. Dey P., Chaudhur, S.R., Efferth T., Pal S. The intestinal 3M (microbiota, metabolism, metabolome) zeitgeist–from fundamentals to future challenges. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2021. no. 176. pp. 265-285. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.09.026/

46. Zhang B., Zhang Y., Xing X., Wang, S. Health benefits of dietary polyphenols: Insight into interindividual variability in absorption and metabolism. Current Opinion in Food Science. 2022. no. 48. p. 100941. doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100941.

47. Zhang R., Li Q., Gu Y., Liao W. Harnessing the Power of Fermented Tea to Improve Gut Microbiota and Combat Obesity Epidemic. Biology. 2024. no. 13(10). p. 779. doi:10.3390/biology13100779

48. Vlaicu P.A., Untea A.E., Varzaru I., Saracila M., Oancea A.G. Designing Nutrition for Health-Incorporating Dietary By-Products into Poultry Feeds to Create Functional Foods with Insights into Health Benefits, Risks, Bioactive Compounds, Food Component Functionality and Safety Regulations. Foods. 2023. no. 12. p. 4001. doi:10.3390/foods12214001