Preview

Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Advanced search

THE DIRECTIONS OF IMPROVEMENT OF A COMPETITION POLICY ON THE BASIS OF DEVELOPMENT OF CONTRACT FORMS OF JOINT ACTIVITY OF SMALL AND LARGE BUSINESS

https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2014-4-231-236

Abstract

Summary: The analysis of the foreign economic theory and practice of antimonopoly regulation, the principles of the Russian civil law and the antitrust law, allows to formulate a number of the basic principles and approaches to an assessment of influence of different types of the contract relations on efficiency of use of public resources, welfare of consumers and the competitive environment, the research basis presented in this article also consists in it. Support of the competition is guaranteed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, is one of bases of the constitutional system of the Russian Federation, and also relevance of a subject of research is confirmed by a constant priority of a state policy it. Development of the competition in economy is a multidimensional task which decision substantially depends on efficiency of carrying out a state policy in a wide range of the directions: from macroeconomic policy, creation of favorable investment climate, including development of financial and tax system, decrease in administrative and infrastructure barriers, before protection of the rights of citizens and national policy. Due to the complexity of a task dynamic landmark approach to work on development of a competition policy in connection with development of contract forms of joint activity of small and large business in the Russian Federation and to formation of the respective directions is necessary. For research by authors of research the following methods are chosen: a statistical method, a reference method to value, a comparative method, system approach, a historical method and a method of the economic analysis of the public relations and the right. Research covers the latest sources in the field reflecting the last economic and standard and legal changes, in particular, them treat: the statistical given, expert estimates, regulations, acts of judicial and administrative practice, scientific publications of economists, sociologists and this subject lawyers. Thus, antimonopoly regulation has to consider mutual advantage for the parties of the concrete agreement, a ratio of the extent of the additional benefit received from joint activity by the large company and small firm that is important for the correct qualification of actions of participants - or as abuses of one of participants of the agreement of the dominant position for restrictions of the competition and receiving exclusive profit or as anti-competitive vertical agreement of the parties.

About the Authors

N. A. Serebriakova
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technology
Russian Federation
Associate Professor, Department of economic theory, Commodity and Trade. phone 89107497142


E. V. Simonova
Orel state institute of economy and trade
Russian Federation
associate Professor, Department of stories, philosophies, advertizing and public relations. phone (4862) 43-08-31


References

1. Analysis of problems of antimonopoly regulation of the contract relations of small and large business: analytical report. M.: Bureau of the economic analysis, 2001. (In Russ.).

2. The order of carrying out the analysis and an assessment of a condition of the competitive environment in the commodity markets approved by the order GKAP Russian Federation No. 169 of 20.12.1996 (10.01.1997 No. 1229 is registered in Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation). (In Russ.).

3. Serebriakova N. A. Methodical approach to development of administrative consultation. Bulletin of the Don state technical university, 2012, no. 5 (66), pp 150-155. (In Russ.).

4. Serebriakova N. A. Structural and functional asymmetry of development. Region: systems, economy, management, 2011, no. 3 (14), pp. 34-40. (In Russ.).

5. Serebriakova N. A. An expert assessment of quality of services of business education for medium and small business. Theoretical and applied questions of economy and a services sector, 2012, no. 7, pp. 121-132. (In Russ.).

6. Simonova E.V. About a subcontract and sub - contractings of small, medium and large business. Economic and humanities, 2009, no. 2 (208), pp. 155-157. (In Russ.).

7. Simonova E.V. Main qualities of businessman. Messenger of economic integration, 2008, no. 1, pp. 127-128. (In Russ.).

8. Simonova E.V. Reasons of braking of small business. Messenger of economic integration, 2008, no. 4, pp. 139-141. (In Russ.).

9. Sibirskaia E.V. System of strategic planning at the regional level. Theoretical and applied questions of economy and services sector, 2012, vol. 1, pp. 7-11. (In Russ.).

10. Stroeva O., Sibirskaia E. Innovative development of the region: specifics of financing. Problems of the theory and practice of management, 2012, no. 01, pp. 60-65. (In Russ.).

11. Khorev A. I., Salikov Iu. A., Dmitrieva L.N. Institutional management of the industrial enterprise and its tools. Voronezh, VGTA, 2009, 146 p. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Serebriakova N.A., Simonova E.V. THE DIRECTIONS OF IMPROVEMENT OF A COMPETITION POLICY ON THE BASIS OF DEVELOPMENT OF CONTRACT FORMS OF JOINT ACTIVITY OF SMALL AND LARGE BUSINESS. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2014;(4):231-236. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2014-4-231-236

Views: 645


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-910X (Print)
ISSN 2310-1202 (Online)