Preview

Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Advanced search

Innovative activity of high-technology companies as assessment and forecasting object

https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2016-3-296-299

Abstract

Innovation activities, as well as innovations, are closely related meanings, and like many others economical definitions, have a broad range of meanings. Main characteristics and attributes of innovation involves new or significantly improved product, that’s being used, or in other words, found its application, and innovative activities – activities focused on realization of innovations. In this article, innovations are mainly considered in terms of high-technology production, evidence from Russian space industry. There are 5 basic stages of lifecycle of innovative project in considered industry: initiation, development, realization, expansion, consumption. Practically, third or fourth, or even both of these stages, often missing because there is no need of them. R&D activities, or even further serial production, based on previous developments, is an innovation activity, because these activities are stages of innovative projects lifecycle itself. Then it seems legit, to draw a conclusion, that in terms of high-technology production, company’s primary activity equals innovative activity. Basic characteristics of innovative activity of high-technology companies as assessment and forecasting object involves high level of uncertainty at every stage of projects lifecycle, high dependency on funding level of this activity, and high level and erratic structure of risk. All the above mentioned, means that assessment and forecasting of innovative activity of high-technology companies, needs development of its own methodological tools for each industry.

About the Authors

A. E. Sklyarov
Institute of space technology, Russian university of friendship of peoples, Mikluho-Maklaya str., 6, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
graduate student, applied economics department


A. Yu. Glebanova
Institute of space technology, Russian university of friendship of peoples, Mikluho-Maklaya str., 6, Moscow, Russia
candidate of economic science, applied economics department


References

1. Вертаков Ю.В., Козьев И.А. Прогнозирование и планирование в условиях рынка // Международный журнал экспериментального образования. 2010. № 1. С. 58–59.

2. Батьковский А.М. Прогнозирование и моделирование инновационного развития экономических систем. М.: онтоПринт, 2011.

3. Батьковский А.М., Семенова Е.Г., Фомина А.В. Прогнозирование и оценка инновационного развития экономических систем // Вопросы радиоэлектроники, серия Общетехническая (ОТ). 2015. №. 1. С. 280–303

4. Чурсин А.А., Глебанова А.Ю. Организационно-штатная структура наукоёмких организаций: эффективное управление инновациями на пространстве СНГ // В сборнике: Научные открытия в эпоху глобализации Сборник статей Международной научно-практической конференции. Уфа, 2016. С. 171–178.

5. Глебанова А.Ю., Каширин А.В. Инновации как материальная основа современного делового цикла // Вестник Университета (Государственный университет управления). 2013 №.3. С. 170–176

6. Robinson D.K.R. et al. Forecasting Innovation Pathways (FIP) for new and emerging science and technologies // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2013. V. 80. №. 2. P. 267–285.

7. Diab S., Kanyaru J., Zantout H. Disruptive Innovation: A Dedicated Forecasting Framework // Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications. 2015. P. 227–237.


Review

For citations:


Sklyarov A.E., Glebanova A.Yu. Innovative activity of high-technology companies as assessment and forecasting object. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2016;(3):296-299. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2016-3-296-299

Views: 885


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-910X (Print)
ISSN 2310-1202 (Online)