The development of academic entrepreneurship as a way of transfer of innovation is an urgent task. One of the main factors in the development of academic entrepreneurship is innovation-oriented staff of higher education institutions. Insufficient attention of the scientific literature to importance of this factor is thwarting progress of various forms of academic entrepreneurship. In connection with this proposed study is aimed at determining the degree of scientific innovation activity influence on the development of academic entrepreneurship in Russia. Academic entrepreneurship in Russia has been chosen as the object of study. Analysis of the basic research in the field of academic entrepreneurship for the period of 2011-2016 years was used to achieve this goal. Analysis of publications was revealed that the innovative activity of the teaching staff of universities is a critical factor in the development of academic entrepreneurship. However, Russian scientists are characterized by low innovation activity, resulting in academic entrepreneurship in Russia is weak. The researchers suggest the following solutions to eliminate or minimize the effects of this problem: full awareness and moral training of the scientists involved in the innovation process of higher education institutions; profit payment; creating a psychological climate that will affect the scientific process of self-realization; continuous training of employees involved in the innovation process of higher education institutions; the creation of conditions that will contribute to the manifestation of creative activity of scientists; provide greater confidence to young scientists, graduate students and undergraduates; providing moral and material encouragement of initiatives, experimentation and creativity of scientific and pedagogical staff; the allocation of free time for scientists to research and search activities and others. The data obtained can be used by the guidance of Russian universities to enhance innovation activity of the teaching staff of universities.

academic entrepreneurship, innovation activity, faculty, higher education institutions, Russia

1. ЛИТЕРАТУРА

2. Гоосен Е. В., Никитенко С. М., Ковригина С. В. Государственно-частное партнерство как фактор выбора долгосрочной стратегии развития малого инновационного предпринимательства // Научные труды ДонНТУ. 2014. № 2. С. 138–147.

3. Миндели Л. Э. Основные направления реализации инновационного потенциала научных учреждений РАН // Инновации. 2013. № 11 (181). С. 33–39.

4. Подвербных О. Е., Гасенко Е. В. Механизм управления инновационным потенциалом персонала наукоемкого предприятия // Вестник Сибирского государственного аэрокосмического университета им. академика М. Ф. Решетнева. 2012. № 1(41). С. 206–210.

5. Фирсова С. П. Трансфер технологий как фактор инновационного развития технического университета // Казанский педагогический журнал. 2011. № 1. С. 54–60.

6. Хегай Е. В., Бабак Л. Н., Филаткина И. Д., Филаткина М. Д. Мотивация и факторы академического предпринимательства // Экономика и предпринимательство. 2015. № 11(1). С. 1075–1085.

7. Шаронов А. Н. Оценка уровня развития инновационной активности российской экономики // Ярославский педагогический вестник. 2012. № 1. С. 78–82.

8. Шевченко Л. С. Университеты как субъекты интеллектуального предпринимательства // Теория и практика правознания. 2014. № 1(5). С. 1–12.

9. Abreu M., Grinevich V. The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities // Research Policy. 2013. № 42. P. 408–422.

10. Aldrich H. E. The emergence of entrepreneurship as an academic field: A personal essay on institutional entrepreneurship // Research Policy. 2012. № 21. P. 1240–1248.

11. Alexeev S. G. Integral Evaluation of the Regional Innovation Potential // The Issues of Modern Economy. 2009. № 2. P. 306–308.

12. Astebro T. Startups by recent university graduates and their faculty: implications for university entrepreneurship policy // Research Policy. 2012. № 41. P. 663–677.

13. Baldini N. University spin-offs and their environment // Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2015. № 15. P. 858–876.

14. Bathelt H. Social foundations of regional innovation and the role of university spin-offs: the case of Canada’stechnology triangle // Industry and Innovation. 2011. № 17. P. 459–486.

15. Biddle J. B. Can patents prohibit research? On the social epistemology of patenting and licensing in science // Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 2014. № 45. P. 14–23.

16. Fairchild R. An entrepreneur's choice of venture capitalist or angel-financing: a behavioral game-theoretic approach // Journal of Business Venturing. 2014. № 26. P. 359–374.

17. Fakhrutdinova E., Zagidullina V., Suleimanov T., Khalikov A. Universities as a driving force of economic development in the creation of innovation system of Russia // Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015. №. 23. P. 1662–1665.

18. Fini R. Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs // Research Policy. 2011. № 40. P. 1113–1127.

19. Goethner M. Scientists’ transition to academic entrepreneurship: Economic and psychological determinants // Journal of Economic Psychology. 2012. № 33. P. 628–641.

20. Grimaldi R., Kenney M., Siegel D. S., Wright M. 30 years after Bayh-Dole: reassessing academic entrepreneurship // Research Policy. 2011. № 40. P. 1045–1057.

21. Plotnikova I., Korneva O., Ustuizhanina A. Barriers to Innovation in the Implementation of the Investment Strategy: an Empirical Study // Behavioral Sciences. 2015. № 166. P. 369–377.

22. Walsh J. P. Local context, academic entrepreneurship and open science: publication secrecy and commercial activity among Japanese and US scientists // Research Policy. 2014. № 43. P. 245–260.

23. Wright M. Academic entrepreneurship, technology transfer and society: where next? // J. Technol. Transf. 2014. № 39. P. 322–334.

24. Wood M. S. A process model of academic entrepreneurship // Business Horizons. 2011. № 54. P. 153–161.