Preview

Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Advanced search

Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage

https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226

Abstract

Silage is the main juicy food and a source of vitamins for animals in the winter-stall period. In order to expand the range of forage crops for the production of high – protein silage in the work used non-traditional forage culture amaranth, which is the content of protein balanced by the number of essential amino acids (especially lysine, methionine and tryptophanus), oils, micro – and macro-elements, vitamins and biologically active substances far superior to traditional forage plants, including legumes. Amaranth belongs to the group of plants hard-ensilage because the level of sugar in its green mass does not exceed the minimum required for the silage process, but the use of starter cultures, contributing to the creation of optimal conditions for the normal flow of fermentation processes, can solve this problem. The comparative characteristic of qualitative indicators of a silo from amaranth paniculate and from maize as raw materials of the most widespread for preparation of green forages is carried out in work. It is established that in the phase of milk-wax ripeness of seeds amaranth has the best technological properties for silage harvesting, as the total loss of nutrients in the silage of amaranth in this phase is minimal. The content of "raw" protein, which is an important indicator in the conditions of protein deficiency in traditional fodder crops, in the amaranth silage of paniculata is almost 2 times higher than in the corn silage. Based on the evaluation of the quality of silage on dry matter content, organic acids, crude protein, degree of acidity and organoleptic indicators it can be concluded that the silage of amaranth is more balanced in terms of key indicators of quality compared to corn silage.

About the Authors

S. V. Pavlenkova
Voronezh state university of engineering technologies
graduate student, biochemestry and biotechnology department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia


G. P. Shuvaeva
Voronezh state university of engineering technologies
Cand. Sci. (Biol.), associate professor, biochemestry and biotechnology department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia


L. A. Miroshnichenko
RusOliva
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), engineer, Lebedeva Str., 4, Voronezh, 394036, Russia


T. V. Sviridova
Voronezh state university of engineering technologies
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), associate professor, biochemestry and biotechnology department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia


E. A. Motina
Voronezh state university of engineering technologies


O. S. Korneeva
Voronezh state university of engineering technologies


References

1. Andrusenko V. A., Kuznetsov I. Yu., Kamalova A. R. Nutrition of green mass of mixed amaranth crops on silage. Nauka molodykh – innovatsionnaya nauka molodykh innovatsionomy APK ["Science of young – innovative science of young innovative development of agroindustrial complex" proceedings of the international youth scientific-practical conference] 2016. pp. 12-18. (in Russian)

2. Viktorov P.I. Increase in protein nutritional value of feed and protein animal nutrition. Zootekhniya [Animal science] 2003. no. 3. pp. 9-12. (in Russian)

3. Vysochina G. I. Amaranth (Amaranthus L.): chemical composition and prospects for utilization (a review). Khimiya rastitel’nogo syr’ya [Chemistry of vegetable raw materials] 2013. no. 2. pp. 5-14. (in Russian)

4. Degtyareva I. A., Gasimova G. A. Amaranth – a source of new food products and feed additives. Ychenye za piski Kazanskoi gosakademii vetmeditsiny [Scientific notes of the Kazan state Academy of veterinary medicine. n.a. N.E. Bauman] 2015. no. 223. pp. 58-61.

5. Zheleznov A.V., Zheleznova N. B., Burmakina N.V. Amarant Nauchnye osnovy [Amaranth. Scientific basis of introduction] Novosibirsk, GEO, 2009. 235 p. (in Russian)

6. Ioffe V. B. Silosovanie kukuuzy [Silage corn] Minsk, 2003. 31 p. (in Russian)

7. Kiselev F. A., Saratov L. I. Amaranth – feed crop with fantastic features. Proizvodstvo I sbyt [Production and marketing] 2010. pp. 4. (in Russian)

8. Miroshnichenko L. A. New food culture in Russia. Prodovol’stvennyi rynok chernozem’ya [Food market of the region] 2009. no. 02 (44). pp. 20. (I Russian)

9. Petukhov E. A. Zootekhnicheskii analiz [Zootechnical analysis of fodder] Moscow, Agropromizdat, 1989. 239 p. (in Russian)

10. Pobednov Yu. A., Kosolapov V. M. Results and main directions of development of the theory of silage at the present stage (review). Problemy biologii produktivnykh zhuvotnykh [Problems of biology productive animals] 2014. no. 1. pp. 21-36.

11. Tsugkiev B.G., Chkareuli L. V. Agrobiological study of the collectible varieties of amaranth paniculate in the conditions of North Ossetia-ALANIA. Izvestiya Gorskogo gosagrouniversiteta [Proceedings of the Gorsky state agrarian University] 2015. vol. 52. no. 2. pp. 267-270. (in Russian)

12. Shilov V. N., Khirug S. S., Zharkovskiy A. P., Magyars N.A. et al. Closemode amaranth on phases of vegetation. Kormoproizvodstvo [Forage production] 2008. no. 8. pp. 29-32. (in Russian)

13. Zubrilin A.A. Minimum of Sugar as the main factor of celosamente feed and method of estimation. Problemy zhivotnovodstva [Problems of livestock] 1937. no. 6. pp. 74-79


Review

For citations:


Pavlenkova S.V., Shuvaeva G.P., Miroshnichenko L.A., Sviridova T.V., Motina E.A., Korneeva O.S. Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2017;79(4):220-226. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226

Views: 855


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-910X (Print)
ISSN 2310-1202 (Online)