Preview

Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Advanced search

Determinants of anti-corruption activities at the regional level

https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2018-1-369-378

Abstract

The article explores the concept of corruption, defined as an obstacle to economic and social development, created by representatives of the power structures of the country, region, enterprise, weakening the efficiency of management and the institutional foundation of society. Anticorruption activity is presented in the article as conditions created by the state and ensuring that the country's economy is not irreparably damaged by internal and external economic threats. The estimated characteristics of the anti-corruption activities of the regions and the country as a whole, as a rule, are studied in the domestic sources and among foreign authors. Statistical evaluation of the relationship between the level of corruption and indicators: the dynamics of GRP growth, the index of real incomes of the population, the costs of training, health care is made on the basis of the coefficient Pearson correlation. Based on the correlation analysis, stable links were established between the level of corruption and the socio-economic indicators of the region's development: an increase in the level of corruption associated with an increase in the population's spending on education and medicine; a reduction in the level of corruption, as a result of increased incomes of the population and higher wages. The consequences of corruption are presented: legal (the undeveloped legislative base, which involves bribery of powerful people, the growth of corruption in the society, the increase in corruption crimes, the inefficiency of the regulatory framework), social (moral violation, low public evaluation of the activities of power structures, low level of culture and upbringing) , economic (bias financial, investment decisions, illegal distribution of property and non-property benefits, the impossibility of competitors Vat with developed countries) and others.

About the Authors

T. I. Ovchinnikova
Voronezh state university of engineering technologies
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), professor, economic security and financial monitoring department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia


G. V. Belyaeva
Voronezh state university of engineering technologies
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), professor, economics and accounting policy department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia


E. Yu. Kolesnikova
Voronezh state university of engineering technologies)
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), associate pofessor, economic security and financial monitoring department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia


O. Yu. Kolomyceva
Voronezh state university of engineering technologies)
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor, economic security and financial monitoring department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia


References

1. Sheremet A.D., Sayfulin R.S. Finansy pedpriyatii [Finances of enterprises] Moscow, INFRA-M. 1999. 343 p. (in Russian)

2. Preobrazhensky BG, Zelenskaya SG, Elizarov DE Economic-mathematical model of the information security market. Region. [Region: Systems, Economics, Management] 2012. no.  4(19). pp. 164–171. (in Russian)

3. Stepashin S.V., Shultz V.L. Voprosy bezopasnosti v sisteme gosudarstvennogo uprevleniya [Security issues in the system of state and municipal management. Part 1. General principles and geopolitical aspects of the security of the Russian Federation] Saint-Petersburg, SPb GTU, 1994. 180 p. (in Russian)

4. Padalkin V. Yu., Vorontsova E.I. The analysis of the competitiveness of the integrated structure based on the benchmarking mechanism. Mesto I rol’ Rossii v mirovom khozyaistve [Sb. articles of the VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference "Place and role of Russia in the world economy"] Voronezh, VGUIT, 2013. pp. 157–161 (in Russian)

5. Ovchinnikova T.I. The study of the competitiveness of enterprises based on the DEA-method (on the example of enterprises of the dairy industry of the Voronezh region). Prakticheskii marketing [Practical marketing] 2009. no. 4 (146). pp. 20–27. (in Russian)

6. Il'in A.I. Planirovanie na predpriyatii [Planning in the Enterprise] Moscow, New knowledge, 2005. 656 p. (in Russian)

7. Stefan, VI Methods of strengthening competitive positions in the development of enterprise strategy. Energiya XXI vek [Energy XXI century] 2007. no. 1 (63). pp. 117–122. (in Russian)

8. Chaikovskaya LN, Duvanova Yu. N., Pasynkova OM. Investigation of motives for the creation of integrated industrial entities. Ekonomika I predprinimatel’stvo [Economics and Entrepreneurship] 2015. no. 5–2(58–2). pp. 851–853. (in Russian)

9. Kolomytseva O. Yu., Kolesnikova E. Yu. Procedures for parametric estimation of economic security of an industrial enterprise. Ekonomika I predprinimatel’stvo [Economics and Entrepreneurship] 2014. no. 12–2(53–2). pp. 756–758. (in Russian)

10. Duvanova Yu.N., Pasynkova OM. Application of new approaches to the assessment of credit risk in Russia. EIU [Economics. Innovation. Quality control] 2015. no. 4 (13). pp. 61–62. (in Russian)

11. Del Monte A., Papagni E. The determinants of corruption in Italy: Regional panel data analysis. European Journal of Political Economy. 2007. vol. 23. no. 2. pp. 379-396.

12. Kalchenko O.A. The model of sustainable socio-economic development of the national economy. Vestnik VGUIT [Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies]. 2016. no. 3. pp. 389-394. (in Russian) doi:10.20914/2310-1202-2016-3-389-394

13. Cole M. A., Elliott R. J. R., Zhang J. Corruption, governance and FDI location in China: A province-level analysis. The Journal of Development Studies. 2009. vol. 45. no. 9. pp. 1494-1512.

14. Sol D. A. The institutional, economic and social determinants of local government transparency. Journal of Economic Policy Reform. 2013. vol. 16. no. 1. pp. 90-107.

15. Bertot J. C., Jaeger P. T., Grimes J. M. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government information quarterly. 2010. vol. 27. no. 3. pp. 264-271.


Review

For citations:


Ovchinnikova T.I., Belyaeva G.V., Kolesnikova E.Yu., Kolomyceva O.Yu. Determinants of anti-corruption activities at the regional level. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2018;80(1):369-378. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2018-1-369-378

Views: 612


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-910X (Print)
ISSN 2310-1202 (Online)