The article formulates the problem of development and coordination of management decisions of distribution of net profit of the enterprise for owners. The analysis of scientific views, mechanisms, methods and provisions to address this problem. As a result of the analysis it was found out that none of the considered articles solved this problem even to a minimum extent. Therefore, the proposed method is relevant not only for the owners of enterprises, but also for economic science. The technique is based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) T. Saaty. This method allows to formulate management decisions of distribution of net profit in the form of hierarchies and to carry out the pair assessment of these decisions in special matrices taking into account weight categories of experts/owners in the form of shares, in authorized capital. The study found that such an indicator as the ratio of consistency (OS) of matrices and hierarchies does not solve the problem sufficiently. Therefore, it is proposed to add or in some cases even replace the indicator with the Pierson-Kolmogorov-Smirnov consistency criteria. Thus, in the technique there is a possibility of triple coordination of decisions in the form of matrix estimates in MAI. To improve the level of consistency of these criteria, the modification of The full numerical scale of T. Saati from 17-point to 9-point and 7-point was made. The method also presents the indicator of the level of the resulting consistency of decisions (URSR) measured by the verbal-numerical scale Of E. Harrington in combination with such characteristics as consensus, compromise, conflict of medium and high severity. Any number of experts/owners and their authorized representatives can be involved in the implementation of the methodology without restrictions. The technique is characterized by a high degree of versatility and flexibility. Therefore, it can be used in enterprises with any organizational and legal form of management. The article presents the results of testing methods on the example of the industrial enterprise "Magma".

management decisions, coordination, distribution of net profit, enterprise, method of hierarchy analysis, Chi-square, Kolmogorov-Smirnov criterion, expert assessments

1. Alabugin A.A., Shageev D.A. Upravlenie razvitiem promyshlennogo predpriyatiya po pokazatelyam disbalansa mezhgruppovyh i organizacionnyh interesov: teoriya i praktika [Management of industrial enterprise development on misbalance of inter-group and organization interests indices]. Chelyabinsk, RBIM, 2014. 236 p. (in Russian).

2. Bagirova Ya.T. Management of enterprise net profit distribution. Ekonomika i upravlenie v 21 veke: tendentsii razvitia [Ecomnomy and management in the 21st century: development tendencies]. 2014. no. 16. pp. 192-196. (in Russian).

3. Valishevskaia L.G., Musatova A.I. Conception of enterprise net profit distribution. Nauchnoie obozrenie [Scientific review]. 2017. no. 3. pp. 98-102. (in Russian).

4. Varpaeva I.A. Accounting in the preparation of management decisions on utilization of profits. Vse dlia bukhgaltera [Everything for the accountant]. 2012. no. 3. pp. 23-27. (in Russian).

5. Ermolaev O.Yu. Matematicheskaya statistika dlya psihologov [Mathematical statistics for psychologists]. M., Flinta: NOU VPO “MPSI”, 2011. 335 p. (in Russian).

6. Zabirova Yu.R., Lysenko D.V. Problems of forming and distributing the organization net profit. Mezhdunarodnyi akademicheskii vestnik [International academic bulletin]. 2018. no. 1-2 (21), pp. 54-57. (in Russian).

7. Kovaliov V.V., Kovaliov Vit.V. Korporativnye finansy i uchet: ponyatiya, algoritmy, pokazateli [Corporate finances and recording: concepts, algorithms, indices]. M., Prospekt, 2015. 1000 p. (in Russian).

8. Koforova N.M. On the issue of decisions validity of distribution and utilization of enterprise net profit. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo [Bulletin of N.I. Lobachevski Nizhny Novgorod University]. 2012. № 5 (1). pp. 242–244. (in Russian).

9. Maslova Yu.N. Effective distribution of enterprise net profit. Novyi universitet. Seria: ekonomika i pravo [New University. Series: Ecomomics and Law]. 2016. №2 (60). pp. 63-66. (in Russian).

10. Raizberg B.A., Lozovskii L.Sh., Starodubtseva E.B. Sovremennyj ehkonomicheskij slovar' [Modern Economics dictionary]. M., Infra-M, 2012. 512 p. (in Russian).

11. Saaty T., Vachnadze R.G., Analiticheskoe planirovanie. Organizaciya sistem [Analytical planning. Organization of systems]. M., Radio i sviaz, 1991. 224 p. (in Russian).

12. Saaty T. Prinyatie reshenij. Metod analiza ierarhij [Decision making. Hierarchy analysis method]. M., Radio i sviaz, 1993. 278 p. (in Russian).

13. Saaty T. Prinyatie reshenij pri zavisimostyah i obratnyh svyazyah: Analiticheskie seti [Decision making with dependence and feedback]. M., LKI, 2008. 360 p. (in Russian).

14. Smirnov N.V. Probabilities of large values of nonparametric one-sided criteria of accord. Trudy Matem. in-ta AN SSSR [Proceedings of the Institute of Mathematics, USSR Academy of Sciences]. 1961. vol. 64. pp. 185-210.

15. (in Russian).

16. Abakarov A., Sushkov Yu., Mascheroni R.H. Multi-criteria optimization and decision-making approach for improving of food engineering processes. International Journal of Food Studies. 2012.

17. Bagdonavicius V., Nikulin M.S. Chi-square goodness-of-fit test for right censored data. The International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. 2011. pp. 30-50.

18. Corder G.W., Foreman D.I. Nonparametric Statistics for Non-Statisticians: A Step-by-Step Approach. New York, Wiley, 2009.

19. Chernoff H., Lehmann E. L. The use of maximum likelihood estimates in ?2 test for goodness of fit. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1954. vol. 25. pp. 579-586.

20. Greenwood P. E., Nikulin M. S. A guide to chi-squared testing. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1996. 280 p.

21. Harker P.T., Derivatives of the Perron root of a positive reciprocal matrix: With applications to the analytic hierarchy process. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 1987. vol. 22. pp. 217–232.

22. Horn R.A., Johnson C.R., Matrix Analysis. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1985.

23. Kolmogoroff A.N. Sulla determinazione empirica di una legge di distribuzione. Giornale dell` Istituto Italiano degly Attuari. 1933. vol. 4. no. 1. pp. 83-91.

24. Lancaster P., Tismenetsky M. The Theory of Matrices. New York, Academic Press, 1985.

25. Lilliefors H.W. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 1967. vol. 62. pp. 399-402.

26. Pearson K. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philosophical Magazine Series 1900. vol. 50. pp. 157-175.

27. Saaty T.L. Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research. 2003. vol. 145. no. 1.

28. Saaty T.L., Hu G. Ranking by the eigenvector versus other methods in the analytic hierarchy process. Applied Mathematical Letters. 1998. no. 11(4). pp. 121–125.

29. Saaty T.L., Vargas L. Inconsistency and rank preservation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1984. no. 28(2). pp. 205-214.

30. Vargas L.G. Analysis of sensitivity of reciprocal matrices. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 1983. no. 12. pp.301–320..