Innovation environment in cross-border agglomerations
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2018-3-463-470
Abstract
As a rule, the innovation environment is considered within the boundaries of a specific region, taking into account the territorial aspect. This point of view is taken into consideration in Russian scientific publications and economic policy. The article deals with a comparative analysis of the category "region innovation environment" and "spatial innovation environment". The criterion for distinguishing between concepts is the spatial boundaries of this environment. Innovative environment of the region can be considered as real. The spatial innovation environment should be described as potentially possible, taking into account the mismatch of its borders with the boundaries of a particular region. As usual the innovation environment of the region goes beyond its administrative boundaries. In this case, the definition "spatial innovation environment" is methodologically justified. The exogenous nature of radical innovations in relation to a particular region is shown. The author's position is based on foreign researches, in which there is no rigid dependence of the region's economic development level on the development of the innovation environment of the region. The research shows that the quantitative parameters of the innovation environment development in the region do not always give an objective picture of the innovative development of a particular region. Indicators of innovative development make it possible to measure only the production of innovations in the region, but do not offer a mechanism for their dissemination and use. The study of the macro region innovation environment of the south of Western Siberia showed that there are conditions for competition for intellectual resources. The process of innovation can give a positive effect, taking into consideration the cooperation of relevant agglomerations innovative environment, excluding duplicate innovative projects. It is necessary to transform regional innovation spaces into a common interregional innovation cluster. Because of it the creation of a coordinating interregional body is necessary.
About the Authors
L. L. Zobova
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor, Economic theory and public administration of the Institute of Economics and management department, Krasnaya str., 6, Kemerovo, 650000, Russia
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor, Economic theory and public administration of the Institute of Economics and management department, Krasnaya str., 6, Kemerovo, 650000, Russia
E. K. Evdokimova
Kemerovo State University
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor, Economic theory and public administration of the Institute of Economics and management department, Krasnaya str., 6, Kemerovo, 650000, Russia
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor, Economic theory and public administration of the Institute of Economics and management department, Krasnaya str., 6, Kemerovo, 650000, Russia
References
1. Semenov A.V. The main factors and properties of the innovation environment. Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo [Russian business]. 2012. no. 18 (240). рр. 54–59. (in Russian).
2. Vakhrushev D.S. Innovative environment as a significant factor in the formation of innovative economy: institutional approach. Nauchnyi zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya «Ekonomika i ekologicheskii menedzhment» [The scientific journal ITMO University. Series «Economics and environmental management»]. 2015. no. 1. рр. 5–8. (in Russian).
3. Karmyshev Y.A., Ivanova N.V. Categories "region" and "innovative environment of the region": scientific approaches to understanding the essence and content. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy [Social and economic phenomena and processes]. 2015. vol.10. no. 7. рр. 41–47. (in Russian).
4. Voeykova O. B, Lyachin V.I. Categorical definition of innovation space. Vestnik SibGAU [Vestnik of SibSАU]. 2015. vol. 16. no. 4. рр. 1014–1021. (in Russian).
5. Zobova L.L. Territory and space: twins or twins? Regionalnaj economica: teorij i practika [Regional economy: theory and practice]. 2008. no. 33. рр. 6–12. (in Russian)
6. Реrsресtivеs on spatial dynamics: cities, culture and environment. Asia-Pac J Reg Sci. 2017. no. 1. pp. 133–153. doi: 10.1007/s41685–017–0037–1 Available at: https://slideheaven.com/comparing-a-spatial-structure-of-innovation-network-between-korea-and-japan-thro.html
7. Crevoisier O., Jeannerat H. Territorial knowledge dynamics: from the proximity paradigm to multi-location milieus. European Planning Studies. 2009. no. 17. pp. 1223–1241.
8. Bucciarelli E., Giulioni G., Ciommi М., Affortunato F. Assessing local knowledge dynamics: Regional Knowledge Economy Indicators. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences. 2010. vol. 5. no. 11. pp.703–708.
9. Wineman J., Hwang Y., Kabo F., Owen-Smith J., Davis G. How Space Augments the Social Structures of Innovation. ARCC 2013 Architectural Research Conference hosted by the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. 2013. Р.719. Available at: www.arcc-journal.org/index.php/repository/article /
10. Abdrahmanova G.I., Bahtin P.D., Gohberg L.M. et. al. Rejting innovacionnogo razvitiya sub"ektov Rossijskoj Federacii. Vypusk 5 [The rating of innovative development of subjects of the Russian Federation. Issue 5]. L. Gokhberg (ed.); National Research University Higher School of Economics. Moscow, HSE, 2017. 260 p. (in Russian).
11. Nureev R.M., Simakovsky S.A. Comparative analysis of innovative activity of Russian regions. Теrrа economicus [Теrrа economicus]. 2017. vol. 15, no. 1. pp. 130 – 147. (in Russian). doi: 10.18522/2073–6606–2017–15–130–147
12. Valovyj regional'nyj produkt na dushu naseleniya po sub"ektam Rossijskoj Federacii v 1998-2016 gg [Gross regional product per capita by subjects of the Russian Federation in 1998–2016]. Available at: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki (in Russian).
13. Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki. Regiony Rossii. Social'no-ehkonomicheskie pokazateli 2017 [Federal state statistics service. Region of Russia. Socio-economic indicators 2017]. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/
14. bgd/regl/b17_14р/Main.htm (in Russian)
15. Amirova R.I. Evaluation of innovation activity in the regions of Russia. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3. Ehkonomika. Ehkologiya [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Global Economic System]. 2017. no. 1(38), pp. 23–29. (in Russian). doi: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvоlsu3.2017.1.3
16. Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki [Federal State statistics service] Available at: http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b03_33 / (in Russian).
17. Ob itogah provedeniya konkursnogo otbora programm razvitiya territorial'nyh klasterov na vklyuchenie v proekt Perechnya pilotnyh programm razvitiya innovacionnyh territorial'nyh klasterov, utverzhdaemyj Pravitel'stvom Rossijskoj Federacii [On the results of the competitive selection of programs for the development of territorial clusters for the inclusion in the project of Variable Pilot Programs for the Development of Innovative Territorial Clusters, approved by the Government of the Russian Federation]. Available at: http://economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/innovations/politic/doc20120619_03 (in Russian)
18. Bautin V.M., Filatova M.V., Abubakar K., Kris O.J. Mechanism of development of integration processes in the region. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta inzhenernykh tekhnologi [Proceedings of the Voronezh state University of engineering technologies]. 2017. vol. 79. no. 2. pp. 225–230. (in Russian). doi: 10.20914/2310–1202–2017–2–225–230
19. Zobova L.L., Shabashev V.A. The problem of providing food resources in urban agglomerations (the case study of the kuzbass agglomeration). Foods and Raw Materials. 2016. vol. 4. no. 1. pp. 186–196. doi: 10.21179/2308–4057–2016–1–186–196
20.
Review
For citations:
Zobova L.L., Evdokimova E.K. Innovation environment in cross-border agglomerations. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2018;80(3):463-470. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2018-3-463-470
Views:
631
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
