Currently, there is a tendency to evaluate the innovation system at the national level. Qualitative inter-country comparison requires quantitative and qualitative assessment of the factors influencing the innovation activity of the region. The purpose of this work was to justify quantitatively the impact of science and business on the innovation activity of the region. International patent applications are selected as an indicator reflecting the result of innovation activity in the region. Statistical hypothesis testing is carried out in this paper. The dependence between the results of innovation activity and innovation space of the region is confirmed by the methods of econometric modeling. The innovation space of the region is described in the work as a set of potential links between business and organizations that create new knowledge. The study used the official statistics of the regions of such countries as Russia, Switzerland, USA, China and Japan. Estimates of parameters of national and regional innovation systems of the Russian Federation, Switzerland, the USA, China and Japan are received by methods of econometric modeling. It is shown that the assessment of elasticity and technical efficiency of the innovation space of the region indicate the development of the innovation system. In the considered time range it is established that the Pareto-optimality property is possessed by the parameters of innovation systems of Japan, China and Switzerland. Estimates of the technical efficiency of the innovation space for a total of 190 regions according to 2012, a comparative analysis of the countries on the basis of the estimates. The paper provides a rationale for the use of parametric descriptions of national and regional innovation systems. This description can be used for cross-country comparison of the impact of science and business on the results of innovation activity, clustering of national innovation systems.

innovation system, parametric description, technical efficiency, econometric modeling, hypothesis testing

1. Arkhipova M.Yu., Karpov E.S. Analysis and modeling of patent activity in Russia and developed countries of the world. RISK: Resursy, Informaciya, Snabzhenie, Konkurenciya [RISK: Resources, Information, Procurement, Competition]. 2012. no. 4. pp. 286–293. (in Russian).

2. Ayvazyan S.A., Afanas'yev M.Yu., Lysenkova M.A. Evaluation of the results of innovation activities in the region. Matematika. Komp'yuter. Obrazovanie [Mathematics. Computer. Education]. 2016. vol. 23. no. 4. pp. 94–115. (in Russian).

3. Kumbhakar S., Lovell K. Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge U.P., 2004. 86. р

4. Innovation Indicators, OECD 2014. PCT patent applications – count. Dataset.

5. Regiony Rossii. Sotsial'no–ekonomicheskiye pokazateli – 2013 g. [Regions of Russia. Social – Economic Indicators – 2013]. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/B13_14p/Main.htm (in Russian).

6. Statistical Yearbook of Switzerland 2014. NZZ-Buchverlag, 2014. 601 p. Available at: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/asset/en/nzz_jb_2014

7. Snyder T.D., Dillow S.A. Digest of Education Statistics 2010. Washington, DC, 2011. 714 p. Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011015.pdf

8. Census Bureau, the Business Information Tracking Series 2014.

9. China Statistical Yearbook 2013. China Statistics Press, 2013. 968 p.

10. Japan Statistical Yearbook 2013. Available at: https://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/nenkan/back62/index.html

11. Ajvazyan S.A., Afanas'ev M.Yu., Kudrov A.V., Lysenkova M.A. On the question of the parameterization of the national innovation system. Prikladnaya ehkonometrika [Applied econometrics]. 2017. no. 45. pp. 29–49. (in Russian).

12. Shamin A.E., Lisina A.Yu., Zaikin V.P., Mart'yanychev A.V. Farming system and its economic efficiency. Vestnik NGIEI [Herald NGIEI]. 2017. no. 5 (72). pp. 54–60. (in Russian).