Methodology of adaptive management of industrial park structure based on stakeholder approach
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2018-4-371-377
Abstract
The purpose of the scientific research presented in this article is the development of the methodological bases for the management of industrial park structures as objects of management. The necessity of the development and development of adaptive management in modern economic conditions is substantiated. The author set the task of exploring the possibilities of adaptive management technology in the context of the development of a stakeholder approach theory for industrial park structures, involving a large number of stakeholders that directly and indirectly influence activities and the subsequent distribution of the results of these activities among stakeholders effects. The central task of the adaptive management of the industrial park structure as an object of management is the search for a mechanism to adapt the strategic priorities of its existence and the corresponding streamlining of decisions and activities in accordance with the identified strategic priorities. The characteristic features of Management by objectives (MBO), proposed in 1954 by Peter Drucker (DruckerP.), The modified Tableau de bord system developed by Chiapello E., Lebas M., and the concept and adaptive management of key performance indicators Key Performance Indicators ( KPI). The study revealed trends in the structure of services provided by consulting companies for the implementation of adaptive management systems in Russia. A sectoral profile of implemented projects on the implementation of adaptive management systems in Russian companies is presented. The methodological problems of implementing an adaptive control system are studied. In conclusion, the author proposes a methodology for adaptive management of an industrial park structure based on building a set of strategic measures aimed at leveling the development strategy of an industrial park structure depending on the state of development indicators, including for the purpose of making decisions on regulating this system, the set of possible options in case of rejection of the indicative assessment of the result of the activity of the stakeholder.
About the Author
A. E. Plakhin
Ural state University of Economics
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), ,, 8 Marta St, 62, Ekaterinburg, 620144, Russia
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), ,, 8 Marta St, 62, Ekaterinburg, 620144, Russia
References
1. Gorodilov A.B., Veselovskaya V.S. Adaptivnoe upravlenie naukoemkim mashinostroitel'nym proizvodstvom [Adaptive management of high-tech machine-building production]. Moscow, 2017. (in Russian).
2. Gorodilov A.B. Ensuring the economic sustainability of the enterprise on the basis of adaptive management. Aktual'nye problemy ehkonomiki i prava [Actual problems of economics and law]. 2011. no. 3. pp. 91–97. (in Russian).
3. Drucker P. The Practice of Management: 1st ed. New York, Harper, 1954.
4. Chiapello E., Lebas M. The tableau de bord, a french approach to management information, working paper (revised third draft). 2001.
5. Mocciaro Li Destri A., Picone P.M., Mina A. Bringing Strategy Back into Financial Systems of Performance Measurement: Integrating EVA and PBC. Business System Review. 2012. vol. 1. no. 1. pp. 85–102.
6. Parmenter D. Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing and Using Winning KPIs. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007. 448 p.
7. Maisel L.S. Performance measurement: the Balanced Scorecard approach. Journal of Cost Management. 1992. no. 6 (2). pp. 47–52.
8. Mc Nair C.J., Lynch R.L., Cross K.F. Do Financial and Nonfinancial Performance Measures Have to Agree? Management Accounting. 1990. pp. 28–35.
9. Rampersad H.K. Universal'naya sistema pokazatelej deyatel'nosti: Kak dostigat' rezul'taty, sohranyaya celostnost' [Universal system of performance indicators: How to achieve results while maintaining integrity]. Moscow, Alpina Business Books, 2004. 352 p. (in Russian).
10. Hachaturov A.E., Belkovskij A.N. Sovremennyj integracionnyj menedzhment [Modern integration management]. Moscow, 2006. (in Russian).
11. N.-G. Ol've, Roj Zh., Vetter M. Sbalansirovannaya sistema pokazatelej. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po ispol'zovaniyu [Balanced scorecard. A practical guide to use]. 2006. 304 p. (in Russian).
12. Gileva T.A. The use of a balanced system of indicators in the practice of industrial enterprise management. Vestnik Ufimskogo gosudarstvennogo aviacionnogo tekhni-cheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Ufa State Aviation Technical University]. 2006. vol. 7. no. 2. pp. 188–194. (in Russian).
13. Reznik R.M., Ruhlyada N.O. Possibilities of using the balanced scorecard at Russian enterprises. Nedelya nauki SPbGPU [Science Week SPbSPU: materials of the scientific and practical conference with international participation]. SPb: SPbSPU, 2014. pp. 387–388. (in Russian).
14. Syroezhin IM, Pavlov G.S. Sistemnyj analiz processov socialisticheskoj urbanizacii [System analysis of the processes of socialist urbanization]. Leningrad, Leningrad Financial and Economic Institute. N.A. Voznesensky (LFEE), 1980. (in Russian).
15. Batov A.A. Ocenka rezul'tativnosti promyshlennoj korporacii na osnove pokazatelej upravlencheskogo ucheta [Performance evaluation of an industrial corporation based on management accounting indicators]. Izhevsk, GOU VPO “Izhevsk State Technical University”, 2005. 25 p. (in Russian).
16. Plahin A.E., Kokovihin A.YU., Ogorodnikova E.S., Suslov S.A. Evaluation of the impact of infrastructure projects on the development of the territory. Vestnik NGIEHI [Herald NGIEI]. 2017. no. 11 (78). pp. 139–147. (in Russian).
17. Bessarabov V.O. The concept of “Open Society” as the basis for the development of entrepreneurship. Vestnik NGIEHI [Herald NGIEI]. 2017. no. 12 (79). pp. 87–102. (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Plakhin A.E. Methodology of adaptive management of industrial park structure based on stakeholder approach. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2018;80(4):371-377. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2018-4-371-377
Views:
606
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
