Preview

Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Advanced search

Comparative characteristics of social approval of the phenomenon of vegetarianism in Russia and the UK

https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2020-3-110-116

Abstract

The article presents an analysis of the social phenomenon of vegetarianism from a historical, medical and sociological point of view. The purpose of this article is to analyze secondary data from cross-cultural studies in Russia and the UK. The main task was to highlight the main features of the attitude towards vegetarianism in the framework of the "Western" mentality and to study the perception of the phenomenon of vegetarianism in the minds of Russians, to compare the data obtained. To accomplish the set tasks, the analysis of theoretical material on the topic of vegetarianism as a phenomenon of modern society, its main types, specificity as a system of sociocultural patterns was carried out. In the course of an empirical analysis of intercountry trends in the field of attitudes towards vegetarianism, the following points were recorded using the example of two countries. The proportion of people on a vegetarian or vegan diet is higher in the UK. However, both in Russia and in the UK, 10–15% of respondents were found who could try this type of diet and stick to it for about a month. In Russia, personal well-being and health is more often the argument in favor of a vegetarian diet, while in the UK people are more interested in protecting the environment.

About the Authors

V. A. Pitkin
Kuban State Technological University
Russian Federation
lecturer, physical education and sports department, Moskovskaya st., 2G, Krasnodar, Russia


L. A. Holodnaya
Kuban Institute of Socioeconomics and Law (branch)
lecturer, ,, st. Atarbekova 42, Krasnodar, Russia


References

1. Zarubina N.N. Vegetarianism in Russia: an individual choice against traditions. Historical Psychology and Sociology of History. 2016. no. 2. pp. 137–154. (in Russian).

2. Goncharova O.D. The benefits and harms of vegetarianism. BMIK. 2013. no. 2. pp. 447. (in Russian).

3. Christopher J.B. We Can’t Keep Meating Like This: Attitudes towards Vegetarian and Vegan Diets in the United Kingdom. Sustainability journal. 2019. no. 11. pp. 1–17.

4. Vegetarianism: Pros and Cons. All-Russian Center for the Study of Public Opinion (VTsIOM). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vegetarianstvo-v-rossii-individualnyy-vybor-protiv-traditsiy (in Russian).

5. Pan X., Houser D. Social approval, competition and cooperation. Experimental Economics. 2017. vol. 20. no. 2. pp. 309-332.

6. Mullee A. et al. Vegetarianism and meat consumption: A comparison of attitudes and beliefs between vegetarian, semi-vegetarian, and omnivorous subjects in Belgium. Appetite. 2017. vol. 114. pp. 299-305.

7. Rosenfeld D.L. The psychology of vegetarianism: Recent advances and future directions. Appetite. 2018. vol. 131. pp. 125-138.

8. Leite A.C., Dhont K., Hodson G. Longitudinal effects of human supremacy beliefs and vegetarianism threat on moral exclusion (vs. inclusion) of animals. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2019. vol. 49. no. 1. pp. 179-189.

9. Iguacel I. et al. Veganism, vegetarianism, bone mineral density, and fracture risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition reviews. 2019. vol. 77. no. 1. pp. 1-18.

10. Dagnelie P.C., Mariotti F. Vegetarian diets: Definitions and pitfalls in interpreting literature on health effects of vegetarianism. Vegetarian and plant-based diets in health and disease prevention. Academic Press, 2017. pp. 3-10.


Review

For citations:


Pitkin V.A., Holodnaya L.A. Comparative characteristics of social approval of the phenomenon of vegetarianism in Russia and the UK. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2020;82(3):110-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2020-3-110-116

Views: 599


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-910X (Print)
ISSN 2310-1202 (Online)