Protective properties of native milk components
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2020-2-83-87
Abstract
A review of the antimicrobial properties of native dairy components was done based on local and international sources. The contribution of biologically active whey proteins (immunoglobulins, lactoferrin, lactoperoxidase, nuclease) to maintaining homeostasis of the body is determined. The mechanism of pathogens suppression by immunoglobulins is described. Two ways of lactoferrin antimicrobial activity are shown: one by absorbing iron in the intestine, and the second by direct interaction of lactoferrin with the bacterial cell. The principle of lactoperoxidase inhibition of various cellular functions of microorganisms is disclosed. The destruction pattern of bacterial cell membranes under the lysozyme treatment is described. The role of xanthine oxidase in the antimicrobial activity of milk is shown. The effect of antimicrobial peptides produced by lactic acid bacteria is considered. The protective components of milk play an important physiological role in the body and have significant technological value. Antimicrobial substances fulfill an important function during passive immunization of a newborn in the initial period of a newborn’s life, when its own immunity has not yet been formed. The components of passive immunity protect the infant from pathogenic microflora. The protective substances maximum level is observed in the first days after calving. The protective components of milk are involved in correcting digestive system homeostasis disorders at adults organisms. The antimicrobial components of milk determine the bactericidal phase of milk, which has a certain technological value. The described biologically active substances complex with antimicrobial properties is highly valued and innovative methods of heat and physical required to maximize its native properties preservation.
About the Authors
E. I. Dobriyan
All-Russian Dairy Research Institute
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), leading researcher, laboratory of resource-saving technologies functional products, Lusinovskaya str., 35.7, Moscow, 155093 Russia
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), leading researcher, laboratory of resource-saving technologies functional products, Lusinovskaya str., 35.7, Moscow, 155093 Russia
A. M. Ilyina
All-Russian Dairy Research Institute
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), junior researcher, laboratory of research-saving technologies functional products, Lusinovskaya str., 35.7, Moscow, 155093 Russia
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), junior researcher, laboratory of research-saving technologies functional products, Lusinovskaya str., 35.7, Moscow, 155093 Russia
References
1. Rozantseva L.E., Rozantsev E.G. Biochemical galaxy of native milk. Dairy industry. 2013. no. 3. pp. 74–76. (in Russian).
2. Mici?ski J., Kowalski I.M., Zwierzchowski G., Szarek J. et al. Characteristics of cow's milk proteins including allergenic properties and methods for its reduction. Polish Annals of Medicine. 2013. vol. 20. no. 1. pp. 69 -76.
3. Begunova A.V., Rozhkova I.V., Shirshova T.I., Glazunova O.A. et al. Biosynthesis of antimicrobial bacteriocin-like compounds by Lactobacillus reuteri LR1 strain: optimization of cultivation conditions. Biotechnology. 2019. vol. 35. no. 5. pp. 58–69. (in Russian).
4. Begunova A.V. Lactic Acid and propionic acid bacteria: forming a community for obtaining functional products with bifidogenic and hypotensive properties. Applied biochemistry and Microbiology. 2019. no. 6. pp. 56–57. (in Russian).
5. Abbring S., Hols G., Garssen J., van Esch B.C.A.M. Raw cow's milk consumption and allergic diseases – The potential role of bioactive whey proteins. European Journal of Pharmacology.2019. vol. 843. no. 15. pp. 55–65.
6. Shuvarikov A.S., Yurova E.A., Tsvetkova V.A. Pastukh O.N. Fractional composition of proteins of camel, goat and cow milk. Dairy industry. 2015. no. 7. pp. 68. (in Russian).
7. Asafov V.A., Tankova N.L., Iskakova E.L., Kharitonov V.D. et al. Some aspects of regulating the microbiological composition of colostrum Food industry. 2019. no. 4. pp. 20–25. (in Russian).
8. Ilyina A.M., Komolova G.S. Natural preservative-complex biologically active drug lysozyme-lactoperoxidase. Storage and processing of agricultural raw materials. 2009. no. 5. pp. 12–14. (in Russian).
9. Leyton W.G., Copestake D.E.J., Otter D.E., Indyk H.E. Analysis of bovine immunoglobulin G in milk, colostrum and dietary supplements: a review. Springer Berlin 2007. vol. 389. no. 1. pp. 93–109.
10. Baker E.N., Baker H.M. et al. Lactoferrin: properties and application. Dairy industry. 2006. no. 2. pp. 38–39. (in Russian).
11. Zobkova Z.S. Antimicrobial properties of lactoferrin oligopeptides. Dairy industry. 2011. no. 7. pp. 72. (in Russian).
12. Gonzales-Chavez S.A, Ar?valo-Gallegos S., Rasc?n-Cruz Q. Lactoferrin Structure, function and applications. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2009. vol. 33. no. 3. pp. 301–308.
13. Zobkova Z.S., Gavrilina A.V., Zenina D.V., Fursova T.P. et al. On some parameters of the lactoferrin extraction process from milk. Dairy industry. 2012. no. 9. pp. 46–47. (in Russian).
14. Kanwar J.R., Roy K., Patel Y., Zhou Shu-Feng. et al. Multifunctional iron bound lactoferrin and nanomedicinal approaches to enhance its bioactive functions. Molecules.2015. vol. 20. pp. 9703–9731.
15. Jenssen H., Hancock R.E.W. Antimicrobial properties of lactoferrin. Biochimie. 2009. vol. 91. no. 1. pp. 19–29.
16. Mudler A.M., Connellan P.A., Oliver C.J., Morris C.A. et al. Bovine lactoferrin supplementation supports immune and antioxidant status in healthy human males. Nutrition Research. 2008. vol. 28. no. 9. pp. 583–589.
17. Hirotani Y, Ikeda K., Kato R., Myotoku M. et al. Protective effects of lactoferrin against intestinal mucosal damage induced by lipopolysaccharide in human intestinal Caco 2 cells. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2008. vol. 128. no. 9. pp.1363–1368.
18. Hille A.A., Schmidt-Giese E., Hermann R.M., Herrmann M.K. et al. A prospective study of faecal calprotectin and lactoferrin in the monitoring of acute radiation proctitis in prostate cancer treatment. Scand Journal Gastroenterol. 2008. vol. 43. no. 1. pp. 52–58.
19. Scarino M.L. A sideways glance: Take in or leave it? The role of lactoferrin in iron sequestration and delivery within the body. Genes & Nutrition. 2007. no. 2. pp. 161–162.
20. Fweja L.W., Lewis M.J., Grandison A.S. Alternative strategies for activation of the natural lactoperoxidase system in cows' milk: trials in Tanzania. Journal Dairy Research. 2007. vol. 74. no. 4. pp. 381–386.
21. Fielding A.J., Singh R., Boscolo B., Loewen P.C. et al. Intramolecular electron transfer versus substrate oxidation in lactoperoxidase: investigation of radical intermediates by stopped-flow absorption spectrophotometry and (9–285 GHz) electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 2008. vol. 47 (37). pp. 9781–9792.
22. Argues J.L, Rodr?guez E., Nu?ez M., Medina M. Antimicrobial activity of nisin, reuterin and the lactoperoxidase system on Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus in cuajada, a semisolid dairy product manufactured in Spain. Journal Dairy Science. 2008. vol. 91. no. 1. pp. 70–75.
23. Clausen M.R., Skibsted L.H., Stagsted J. Inhibition of lactoperoxidase-catalyzed 2,2'-azino-bis(3 ethylbenzthiazoline 6 sulfonic acid) (ABTS) and tyrosine oxidation by tyrosine-containing random amino acid copolymers. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2008. vol. 56. no. 18. pp. 8692–8698.
24. Seifu E., Buys E.M., Donkin E.F., Petzer I.-M. Antibacterial activity of the lactoperoxidase system against foodborne pathogens in Saanen and South African Indigenous goat milk. Food Control. 2004. vol. 15. no. 6. pp. 447–452.
25. Gurtler J.B., Beuchat L.R. Inhibition of growth of Enterobacter sakazakii in reconstituted infant formula by the lactoperoxidase system. Journal of Food Protection. 2007. vol. 70. no. 9. pp. 2104–2110.
26. Ponomarev A.N., Melnikova E.I., Dolmatova O.I., Klyuchnikova D.V. Chemical composition of milk of cows of different breeds. Dairy industry. 2015. no. 7. pp. 63–65. (in Russian).
27. Kutta H., Willer A., Steven P., Br?uer L. et al. Distribution of mucins and antimicrobial substances lysozyme and lactoferrin in the laryngeal subglottic region. Journal of anatomy. 2008. vol. 213. no. 4. pp. 473–481.
28. Shidlovskaya V.P. Role of enzymes in free radical oxidation of milk lipids. Dairy industry. 2017. no. 2. pp. 30–33. (in Russian).
29. Harrison R. Milk xanthine oxidase: Properties and physiological roles. International Dairy Journal. 2006. vol. 16. no. 6. pp. 546–554.
30. Fox P.F., Kelly A.L. Indigenous enzymes in milk: Overview and historical aspects-Part 1. International Dairy Journal. 2006. vol. 16. no. 6. pp. 500–516.
31. Silanikova N., Shapiro F., Silanikova N. Distribution of xanthine oxidase and xanthine dehydrogenase activity in bovine milk: Physiological and technological implications. International Dairy Journal. 2007. vol. 17. no. 10. pp. 1188–1194.
32. Wendie L.С., Cardoen S., Daube G., Block J.D. et al. Raw or heated cow milk consumption: Review of risks and benefits. Food Control. 2013. vol. 31. no. 1. pp. 251–262
Review
For citations:
Dobriyan E.I., Ilyina A.M. Protective properties of native milk components. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2020;82(2):83-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2020-2-83-87
Views:
498
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
