Optimization of water-heat treatment of barley batch (mix) in ethanol production
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2020-3-131-138
Abstract
About the Authors
G. V. AgafonovDr. Sci. (Engin.), fermentation and sugar production technologies department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
T. S. Kovaleva
lead engineer, biochemical department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
A. N. Yakovlev
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), fermentation and sugar production technologies department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
A. S. Muravev
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), SM department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
S. F. Yakovleva
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), biochemical department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
References
1. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO). Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC
2. Kim S., Dale B.E. Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues. Biomass Bioenerg. 2004. vol. 26. pp. 361–375.
3. Naumkin D.V., Sidorenko V.S. Determination of the chemical composition of biomass in spring barley varieties. Fundamental principles of production process management to improve the economic and energy efficiency of the agro-industrial complex. 2019. pp. 83-85. (in Russian).
4. Weiss W.P., Erikson D.O., Erikson M., Fisher G.R. Barley distillers grains as a protein supplement for dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1989. vol. 72. pp. 980–987.
5. Otles S., Cagindi O. Cereal-based functional foods and nutraceuticals. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2006. vol. 5. pp. 107–112.
6. Georg-Kraemer J.E., Mundstock E.C., Cavalli-Molina S. Developmental expression of amylases during barley malting. J. Cereal Sci. 2001. vol. 33. pp. 279–288.
7. Thomas K.C., Ingledew W.M. Relationship of low lysine and high arginine concentrations to efficient ethanolic fermentation of wheat mash. Can. J. Microbiol. 1992. vol. 38. pp. 626–634.
8. Park J.T., Rollings J.E. Effects of substrate branching characteristics on kinetics of enzymatic depolymerization of mixed linear and branch polysaccharides. I. Amylose/amylopectin-amylolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1994. vol. 44. pp. 792–800.
9. Wang P., Singh V., Xue H., Johnston D.B. et al. Comparison of raw starch hydrolyzing enzyme with conventional liquefaction and saccharification enzymes in dry-grind corn processing. Cereal Chem. 2007. vol. 84. pp. 10–14.
10. Yakovlev A.N. et al. The use of a multi-enzyme complex in the production of ethyl alcohol from problematic raw materials. Proccedings of VSUET. 2012. no. 3. pp. 148-152. (in Russian).
11. Yakovlev A.N. et al. Influence of multi-enzyme composition on the fermentation process of rye wort. Production of alcohol and alcoholic beverages. 2013. no. 3. pp. 26-28. (in Russian).
12. Tolgurova A.A., Khokonova M.B. Scientific and technological aspects of resource-saving technology in alcohol production. Agricultural land use and food security. 2018. pp. 170-174. (in Russian).
13. Zueva N.V. et al. Selection of enzyme preparations and temperature-time modes of water-heat and enzymatic treatment in the development of a comprehensive technology for processing grain raw materials. Proccedings of VSUET. 2019. vol. 81. no. 1 (79). (in Russian).
14. Polonsky V.I. et al. Evaluation of the content of antioxidants in barley and oats based on its physical parameters. Bulletin of the Krasnoyarsk state agrarian University. 2016. no. 8. (in Russian).
15. Jeon H. et al. Improvement of the Bioethanol Productivity from Debranned Barley. Transactions of the Korean hydrogen and new energy society. 2018. vol. 29. no. 6. pp. 648-653.
Review
For citations:
Agafonov G.V., Kovaleva T.S., Yakovlev A.N., Muravev A.S., Yakovleva S.F. Optimization of water-heat treatment of barley batch (mix) in ethanol production. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2020;82(3):131-138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2020-3-131-138