Comparison of innovative development indexes in the space of regional differentiation characteristics
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2020-4-340-346
Abstract
Currently, one of the priorities of the country's development is the transition of the economy to an innovative path of development. Analysis and evaluation of innovative development at the regional and national levels, quantitative assessment of regional innovation activity, and development of methods for evaluating the effectiveness of interaction between science and business that allow choosing the right strategies for solving management problems are of particular relevance. The subject of the research is the indexes of innovative development of regions. The purpose of the study is to compare the indexes of innovative development of regions and identify indexes that do not have significant differences. Eight indexes describing the innovative development of Russian regions are compared. We use four of the author's indexes, published earlier: the index of technical efficiency innovative space for international patent applications TEMPZ, the index of technical efficiency innovative space for patent applications TEPZ, the index of technical efficiency innovative space issued patents TEPV and the index of technical efficiency innovative space developed for new technologies TETECH. Along with the author's indexes, four other indexes with a similar applied focus are considered, published by the Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge (ISSEK) in National Research University — Higher School of Economics (HSE), RIA rating, and Association of Innovative Regions of Russia (AIRR). In the course of the study, a comparative analysis of the indexes of innovative development in the space of expert-defined characteristics of regional differentiation was made. Analysis of the cosines of the angles between the indexes constructed using the beta coefficients of the regressions of these indexes on the differentiation characteristics allows us to refine the results of correlation analysis and identify a subset of indexes that are not distinguishable when solving control problems parameterized using the differentiation characteristics.
About the Authors
M. Y. Afanasiev
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Econ..), chief researcher, applied econometrics department, Nakhimovsky Av., 47 Moscow, 117418, Russia
A. V. Kudrov
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences
Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), leading researcher, probabilistic and statistical methods and models in economics department, Nakhimovsky Av., 47 Moscow, 117418, Russia
M. A. Lysenkova
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences
researcher, applied econometrics department, Nakhimovsky Av., 47 Moscow, 117418, Russia
References
1. Ayvazyan S.A., Afanasyev M.Yu., Kudrov A.V. A method for comparing regions of the Russian Federation according to estimates of technical efficiency taking into account the structure of production. 2018. no. 54 (1). pp. 43-51. (in Russian).
2. Ayvazyan S.A., Afanasyev M.Yu., Kudrov A.V. Indicators of the main directions of social and economic development and their aggregates in the space of characteristics of regional differentiation. Applied Econometrics. 2019. no. 54. pp. 51–69. doi: 10.24411/1993–7601–2019–10003 (in Russian).
3. Kumbhakar S., Lovell K. Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
4. Aivazian S.A., Afanasiev S.A., Kudrov A.V. Indicators of Regional Development Using Differentiation Characteristics. Montenegrin Journal of Economics. 2018. vol. 14. no. 3. pp. 7–22.
5. Kudryashova I.A. Investment aspects of globalization of the world economy at the regional level. Problems of Economics and Law. 2015. no. 84. pp. 60–65. (in Russian).
6. Ibragimov R.N.O. Problems of sustainable development of the economy of the Altai Territory. Vestnik NSUEM. 2019. no. 2. pp. 194-203. (in Russian).
7. Abdrakhmanova G.I., Bakhtin P.D., Gokhberg L.M. Rating of innovative development of constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Issue 5. Moscow, NRU HSE, 2017. 260 p. (in Russian).
8. Abdrakhmanova G.I., Bakhtin P.D., Gokhberg L.M. and other Rating of innovative development of constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Issue 6. Moscow, NRU HSE, 2020. 264 p. (in Russian).
9. RIA Rating. Available at: https://riarating.ru/infografika/20171017/630075019.html (in Russian).
10. Krasnova N.A., Pleskanyuk T.N. Prospect development of innovative economy. 2016. 78 p.
11. Isaksen A., Trippl M. Innovation in space: The mosaic of regional innovation patterns. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2017. vol. 33. no 1. pp. 122-140.
12. Polyakova A.G. et al. A model of regional economic space modernization. European Research Studies. 2018. vol. 21. pp. 624-634.
13. Chen J., Cheng J., Dai S. Regional eco-innovation in China: An analysis of eco-innovation levels and influencing factors. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017. vol. 153. pp. 1-14.
14. Grillitsch M., Sotarauta M. Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in human geography. 2020. vol. 44. no. 4. pp. 704-723.
15. Akhmetshin E.M. et al. The influence of innovation on social and economic development of the Russian regions. European Research Studies. 2018. vol. 21. pp. 767-776.
Review
For citations:
Afanasiev M.Y., Kudrov A.V., Lysenkova M.A. Comparison of innovative development indexes in the space of regional differentiation characteristics. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2020;82(4):340-346. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2020-4-340-346
Views:
598
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
