The article contains methodological aspects of sustainable development of industrial ecosystems. The relevance of the study is confirmed by the fact that the promotion of inclusive and sustainable industry and further investment in physical infrastructure, innovation and research are essential for long-term economic development. It has been concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic has such destabilizing consequences that it threatens to halt or even reverse progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. However, a fairly rapid recovery of industry after coping with the coronavirus pandemic is possible, unlike the economy as a whole, which will require a much longer recovery period. The article proposes the architecture of the methodology for the sustainable development of industrial ecosystems, which includes five levels (paradigm, meta-level, ontology, meanings and directly ecosystem level). The paradigm in the study is the super task, the mental model of the transition to a new economy, to a new way of industrial production, to a new thinking. The meta-level of methodology is represented by the principles of sustainable development of industrial ecosystems, theoretical provisions (hypotheses, fundamental approaches, basic theories, laws of development). At the ontological level, the methodology for the sustainable development of industrial ecosystems uses digital twins, basic organizational and managerial mechanisms (procedures, tools, structures). The semantic level includes a conceptual apparatus (glossary), as well as applied theories and concepts of the sustainable development of industrial ecosystems. The ecosystem level of the methodology for sustainable development of industrial ecosystems combines the concepts of economic, ecological and natural-biological systems. The sustainable development of the industrial ecosystem is proposed to be managed at six levels (methodological, ideological, conceptual, modelling, application and technology). The conclusion concluded that an ecosystem-based economic model achieves the highest production efficiency compared to a traditional economy model and a platform-based digital model.

methodology, sustainable development, industrial ecosystem, coronacrisis

1. Materials of the general meeting of members of the Russian Academy of Sciences 23 iyunya 2020 goda. Moscow, 2020. 438 p. (in Russian).

2. Development of industrial complexes of the EAEU member states in January-June 2020. Moscow, 2020. 42 p. (in Russian).

3. Sustainable Development Goals Report. UN, 2020. 68 p. (in Russian).

4. Kosten D.G. Transition from a closed enterprise to an ecosystem. Problems of the development of the financial system of the state in the context of globalization:: XXI mezhreg. scientific-practical Conf., Simferopol, March 21-22, 2019, Simferopol, 2019. pp. 108–110. (in Russian).

5. Kleiner G.B. Industrial ecosystems: a look into the future. Economic revival of Russia. 2018. no. 2 (56). pp. 53–62. (in Russian).

6. Popov E.V., Simonova V.L., Tihonova A.D. The structure of industrial "ecosystems" in the digital economy. Management in Russia and abroad. 2019. №. 4. pp. 3–11. (in Russian).

7. Gamidullaeva L.A., Tolstyh T.O., SHmeleva N.V. Methodology for a comprehensive assessment of the potential of an industrial ecosystem in the context of sustainable development of the region. Models, systems, networks in the economy, technology, nature and society. 2020. no. 2(34). pp. 29–48. doi: 10.21685/2227-8486-2020-2-3 (in Russian).

8. Habibullin R.I. Formation and development of innovative industrial ecosystems: the experience of the Moscow innovation cluster. Economy and Entrepreneurship. 2020. no. 10. pp. 442–450. (in Russian).

9. Kosten' D.G. Changing the paradigm of thinking: fundamental problems of the cryptosphere. Economic basis for the development of science and technology in Russia. 2018. pp. 42–47. (in Russian).

10. Bodrunov S.D. Noonomics: Conceptual Foundations of a New Development Paradigm. News of the Ural State Economic University. 2019. vol.20. no.1. pp. 5-12. doi: 10.29141 / 2073-1019-2019-20-1-1 (in Russian).

11. Glaz'ev S.YU. Noonomics as the core of the formation of a new technological and world economic order. Economic revival of Russia. 2020. no. 2 (64). pp.15-32. (in Russian).

12. Lowe E. A., Evans L. K. Industrial ecology and industrial ecosystems. Journal of cleaner production. 1995. vol. 3. no. 1-2. pp. 47-53.

13. Geng Y., C?t? R. Diversity in industrial ecosystems. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 2007. vol. 14. no. 4. pp. 329-335.

14. Sheng H. X. et al. Ecosystem intrinsic value and its application in decision-making for sustainable development. Journal for Nature Conservation. 2019. vol. 49. pp. 27-36.

15. Sachs J. D. et al. Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability. 2019. vol. 2. no. 9. pp. 805-814.

16. Polasky S. et al. Role of economics in analyzing the environment and sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019. vol. 116. no. 12. pp. 5233-5238