Study of the rheological model of pasta dough for additive manufacturing
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2021-3-55-60
Abstract
Rheological measurements were carried out on pasta dough from a mixture of semolina and whole wheat flour from durum wheat. To determine the rheological characteristics under extrusion conditions and its relation to the behavior of the pasta dough during the processing of products, the object of study was extruded using a capillary viscometer and a laboratory extruder. Creep tests were also carried out to check the possibility of neglecting the elastic component of deformation. The influence of temperature and degree of hydration on the viscosity of pasta dough was investigated. The purpose of this study is to determine the rheological model required for the subsequent analysis of the process of extrusion 3D-printing of pasta dough. The results showed that the pasta dough behaves like a pseudoplastic liquid, which can be described using a power law model. Increased hydration levels reduced the apparent dough viscosity, which correlated with extrusion pressure. Studies have confirmed the viscoelastic behavior of pasta, but an important observation for the purposes of this study is that the elastic component of deformation is very small compared to yield conditions. There was a decrease in the value of the coefficient of consistency with an increase in the degree of hydration of the dough from 30 to 34%. The moisture index of the dough also influenced the flow index. The overall value of the flow index varied from 0.284 for 30% and 0.404 for 34%, it was observed to increase with increasing moisture content. The developed rheological models of pasta dough will be used to simulate the flow behavior when printing in an extrusion-type 3D printer using computational fluid dynamics technology.
About the Authors
S. A. BredihinRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Engin.), professor, department of processes and apparatus of processing industries, Timiryazevskaya str., 49, Moscow, 127550, Russia
A. N. Martekha
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), associate professor, department of processes and apparatus of processing industries, Timiryazevskaya str., 49, Moscow, 127550, Russia
Y. E. Kaverina
graduate student, department of processes and apparatus of processing industries, Timiryazevskaya str., 49, Moscow, 127550, Russia
References
1. Sharikov A. Yu., Stepanov V.I., Ivanov V.V., Polivanovskaya D.V., Amelyakina M.A. Extrusion cooking of wet mixtures of wheat flour with carrot bagasse in technology of ready-to-eat products. Vestnik VGUIT [Proceedings of VSUET]. 2018. vol. 80. no. 3. pp. 43–49. (In Russian). doi:10.20914/2310–1202–2018–3–43–49.
2. Shchekoldina T.V. Development of technological solutions for the production of gluten-free pasta based on quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) // Technology and merchandising of the innovative foodstuff. 2019. no. 6(59). pp. 56–62. (in Russian).
3. Polynkova N.E., Zhilyaeva N.S. New technologies in the production of pasta. Education and science without borders: fundamental and applied research. 2020. no. 12. pp. 122–126. (in Russian). doi:10.36683/2500–249X/2020–12/122–126.
4. Bredihin S.A., Antipov S.T., Andreev V.N., Martekha A.N. Influence of rheological characteristics on the quality of 3D printing of food pastes. Vestnik VGUIT [Proceedings of VSUET]. 2021. vol. 83. no. 2. pp. 40–47. (in Russian). doi:10.20914/2310–1202–2021–2–40–47
5. Pribytkov A.V., Ovsyannikov V. Yu., Martekha A.N., Toroptsev V.V. The main factors affecting the kinetics of the drying process of fermented wheat raw materials. Storage and processing of agricultural raw materials. 2015. no. 5. pp. 33–35. (in Russian).
6. Bredikhin, S.A., Andreev, V.N., Martekha, A.N. & Berezovskiy, Yu. M. (2021). Correlation between rheological properties and quality three-dimensional printed chocolate mass. Polzunovskiy vestnik, (3), 111–116. (in Russian). doi:10.25712/ASTU.2072–8921.2021.03.015.
7. Tolochko N.K., Andrushevich A.A., Vasilevskii P.N., CHugaev P.S. Foundry applications of extrusion 3D printing technology // Casting and metallurgy. 2018. no. 4(93). pp. 139–144. (in Russian). doi:10.21122/1683–6065–2018–4–139–144.
8. Kogan V.V., Semenova L.E. Engineering rheology in the food industry. Proceedings of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series: Fisheries. 2019. no. 4. pp. 147–156. doi:10.24143/2073–5529–2019–4–147–156 (in Russian).
9. Sarghini F., Romano A, Masi P. Experimental analysis and numerical simulation of pasta dough extrusion process // Journal of Food Engineering. 2016. vol. 176. pp. 56–70. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.09.029.
10. Romano A., Ferranti P., Gallo V., Masi P. New ingredients and alternatives to durum wheat semolina for a high quality dried pasta. Current Opinion in Food Science. 2021. vol. 41. pp. 249–259. doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2021.07.005.
11. Derossi A., Caporizzi R., Oral M.O., Severini C. Analyzing the effects of 3D printing process per se on the microstructure and mechanical properties of cereal food products. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies. 2020. vol. 66. 102531. doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102531
12. Le-Bail A., Maniglia B.C., Le-Bail P. Recent advances and future perspective in additive manufacturing of foods based on 3D printing. Current Opinion in Food Science. 2020. vol. 35. pp. 54–64. doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2020.01.009
13. Wilms P., Daffner K., Kern C., Gras S.L., Schutyser M.A.I., Kohlus R. Formulation engineering of food systems for 3D-printing applications – A review. Food Research International. 2021. vol. 148. 110585. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110585
14. Raman Kumar P., Kumar R. 3D printing of food materials: A state of art review and future applications. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020. vol. 33. part 3. pp. 1463–1467. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.005
15. Masbernat L., Berland S., Leverrier C., Moulin G., Michon C., Almeida G. Structuring wheat dough using a thermomechanical process, from liquid food to 3D-printable food material. Journal of Food Engineering. 2021. vol. 310. 110696. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2021.110696
16. Joyner S. (Melito) H. Explaining food texture through rheology. Current Opinion in Food Science. 2018. vol. 21. pp. 7–14. doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2018.04.003
17. De Bondt Y., Hermans W., Moldenaers P., Courtin C.M. Selective modification of wheat bran affects its impact on gluten-starch dough rheology, microstructure and bread volume. Food Hydrocolloids. 2021. vol. 113. 106348. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106348
18. Jaensson N.O., Anderson P.D., Vermant J. Computational interfacial rheology. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics. 2021. vol. 290. 104507. doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2021.104507
19. Mishra K., Kohler L., Kummer N., Zimmermann S., Ehrengruber S., K?mpf F., Dufour D., Nystr?m G., Fischer P., Windhab E.J. Rheology of cocoa butter. Journal of Food Engineering. 2021. vol. 305. 110598. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2021.110598
20. Wen Y., Che Q.T., Kim H.W., Park H.J. Potato starch altered the rheological, printing, and melting properties of 3D-printable fat analogs based on inulin emulsion-filled gels. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2021. V. 269. 118285. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11828
Review
For citations:
Bredihin S.A., Martekha A.N., Kaverina Y.E. Study of the rheological model of pasta dough for additive manufacturing. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2021;83(3):55-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2021-3-55-60