Preview

Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Advanced search

Evaluation of the bacterial composition of sour cream using high-throughput sequencing

https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2021-3-129-134

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria are actively used as starter cultures for various food products, including dairy products. The quality of the final product often depends on the quality of the starter culture. Sour cream is a traditional product in many countries. Its production is based on the fermentation of cream with the addition of certain types of starter cultures belonging to the genera Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Pediococcus and Enterococcus. Using the method of high-throughput sequencing, the bacterial compositions of sour cream samples from various manufacturers available on the Russian market were investigated. Sequencing was performed on an Illumina MiSeq platform. Bacterial taxa were taken into account, whose percentage exceeded 1% relative to all identified microorganisms in the sample. As a result of the analysis, it was found that the dominant bacteria in all samples of 20% sour cream were representatives of the genera Streptococcus and Lactococcus. Samples No. 3 and No. 10 contained Lacticaseibacillus. Their percentage in these samples did not exceed 2%. In sour cream sample No. 1, representatives of the genus Enterococcus were identified (3% of the total number of bacteria found in the sample). Species analysis of the microbial community of the studied samples using the Nucleotide BLAST system made it possible to determine that Lactococcus lactis, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (sour cream numbers 3 and 10) and Enterococcus faecium are probably used as starter cultures. These bacteria are traditionally used in the production of fermented dairy products due to the ability to form specific tastes, aromas and textures during fermentation.

About the Authors

E. Y. Nesterova
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
Russian Federation

junior researcher, laboratory of metagenomics and food biotechnology, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia



M. Y. Syromyatnikov
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Cand. Sci. (Biol.), senior researcher, professor, laboratory of metagenomics and food biotechnology, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia



V. N. Popov
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Dr. Sci. (Biol.), professor, laboratory of metagenomics and food biotechnology, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia



References

1. Danylenko S.G., Bodnarchuk O.V., Ryzhkova T.M. et al. The effects of thickeners upon the viscous properties of sour cream with a low fat content. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Technologia Alimentaria. 2020. vol. 19. pp. 359–368. doi: 10.17306/J.AFS.0836

2. Yu J., Wang H.M., Zha M.S. et al. Molecular identification and quantification of lactic acid bacteria in traditional fermented dairy foods of Russia. Journal of Dairy Science. 2015. vol. 98. pp. 5143–5154. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015–9460

3. Mathur H., Beresford T.P., Cotter P.D. Health Benefits of Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) Fermentates. Nutrients. 2020. vol. 12. pp. 1679. doi: 10.3390/nu12061679

4. Linares D.M., G?mez C., Renes E. et al. Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bifidobacteria with Potential to Design Natural Biofunctional Health-Promoting Dairy Foods. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017. vol. 8. pp. 846. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00846

5. Arqu?s J.L., Rodr?guez E., Langa S. et al. Antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria in dairy products and gut: effect on pathogens. BioMed Research International. 2015. vol. 2015. pp. 584183. doi: 10.1155/2015/584183

6. Marco M.L., Heeney D., Binda S. et al. Health benefits of fermented foods: microbiota and beyond. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2017. vol. 44. pp. 94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.11.010

7. Hayek S., Gyawali R., Aljaloud S. et al. Cultivation media for lactic acid bacteria used in dairy products. Journal of Dairy Research. 2019. vol. 86. pp. 490–502. doi: 10.1017/S002202991900075X

8. Elionora Hantsis-Zacharov M.H. Culturable psychrotrophic bacterial communities in raw milk and their proteolytic and lipolytic traits. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007. vol. 73. pp. 7162–7168. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00866–07

9. Duniere L., Xu S., Long J. et al. Bacterial and fungal core microbiomes associated with small grain silages during ensiling and aerobic spoilage. BMC Microbiology. 2017. vol. 17. pp. 50. doi: 10.1186/s12866–017–0947–0

10. Luzzi G., Brinks E., Fritsche J. et al. Microbial composition of sweetness-enhanced yoghurt during fermentation and storage. AMB Express. 2020. vol. 10. pp. 131. doi: 10.1186/s13568–020–01069–5

11. Zamfir M., Vancanneyt M., Makras L. et al. Biodiversity of lactic acid bacteria in Romanian dairy products. Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 2006. vol. 29. pp. 487–95. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.10.002

12. Terzi?-Vidojevi? A., Veljovi? K., Tolina?ki M. et al. Diversity of non-starter lactic acid bacteria in autochthonous dairy products from Western Balkan Countries – Technological and probiotic properties. Food Research International. 2020. vol. 136. pp. 109494. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109494

13. Xu W.L., Li C.D., Guo Y.S. et al. A snapshot study of the microbial community dynamics in naturally fermented cow's milk. Food Science & Nutrition. 2021. vol. 9. pp. 2053–2065. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2174

14. Yu J., Mo L., Pan L. et al. Bacterial Microbiota and Metabolic Character of Traditional Sour Cream and Butter in Buryatia, Russia. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018. vol. 9. pp. 2496. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02496

15. Fadrosh D.W., Gajer B.M.P., Sengamalay N. et al. An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumine MiSeq platform. Microbiome. 2014. vol. 2. pp. 6. doi: 10.1186/2049–2618–2–6

16. Hugerth L.W., Wefer H.A, Lundin S. et al. Dege Prime, a program for degenerate primer design for broad-taxonomic-range PCR in microbial ecology studies. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2014. vol. 80. pp. 5116–5123. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01403–14

17. Merkel A.Y., Tarnovetskii I.Y., Podosokorskaya O.A. et al. Analysis of 16S rRNA primer systems for profiling of thermophilic microbial communities. Microbiology. 2019. vol. 88. pp. 671–680. doi: 10.1134/S0026261719060110

18. Quast C., Pruesse E., Yilmaz P. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013. vol. 41. pp. D590D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219

19. Bintsis T. Lactic acid bacteria as starter cultures: An update in their metabolism and genetics. AIMS Microbiology. 2018. vol. 4. pp. 665–684. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.665

20. Tidona F., Francolino S., Ghiglietti R. et al. Characterization and pre-industrial validation of Streptococcus thermophilus strains to be used as starter cultures for Crescenza, an Italian soft cheese. Food Microbiology. 2020. vol. 92. pp. 103599. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103599

21. Siedler S., Rau M.H., Bidstrup S. et al. Competitive exclusion is a major bioprotective mechanism of Lactobacilli against fungal spoilage in fermented milk products. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2020. vol. 86. pp. e02312–19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02312–19

22. Ben Bra?ek O., Smaoui S. Enterococci: Between Emerging Pathogens and Potential Probiotics. BioMed Research International. 2019. vol. 2019. pp. 5938210. doi: 10.1155/2019/5938210

23.


Review

For citations:


Nesterova E.Y., Syromyatnikov M.Y., Popov V.N. Evaluation of the bacterial composition of sour cream using high-throughput sequencing. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2021;83(3):129-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2021-3-129-134

Views: 420


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-910X (Print)
ISSN 2310-1202 (Online)