Comparative characteristics of Chinese silk breed chickens and broilers
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2022-1-82-85
Abstract
Today poultry farming in the economy of our country is one of the leading branches of agricultural production due to the fact that it is able to provide a considerable part of the population with high-quality products. That is why the development of new breeds of birds is an important aspect. In this publication, chickens of the Chinese silk breed are considered. A scheme was proposed for the cultivation of Chinese silk breed chickens and broilers for the subsequent comparative characteristics of the breeds. The cultivation and slaughter of birds were carried out on the territory of the farm of the Krasnodar Territory. A comparative assessment of the characteristics of Chinese silk and broiler chickens was carried out in the laboratories of the Department of Technology of Storage and Processing of Livestock Products, the Research Institute of Biotechnology and Certification of Food Products of the KubGAU named after I.T. Trubilin. As a result of cutting the carcasses of the Chinese silk breed (n=5), the following data were obtained: carcass - 2.13 kg, liver - 0.05 kg, heart - 0.04 kg, neck - 0.17 kg, stomach - 0.095 kg, legs - 0.145 kg, head - 0.145 kg, wings - 0.26 kg. During the comparative analysis of chickens of different breeds, positive and negative qualities of Chinese silk chicken were revealed. According to the results of the comparative characteris-tics, the advantages of the Chinese silk bird breed can be considered: exotic appearance, unpretentiousness in maintenance, the use of meat and eggs, resistance to cold, good incubation and survival of offspring. However, there are minor drawbacks: low productivity, high cost of purchasing poultry and eggs. Thus, the database on the comparative evaluation of chicken meat of the Chinese silk breed was replenished.
About the Authors
S. V. Patieva
Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), associate professor, livestock products storage and processing technology department, st. Kalinina, house 13, Krasnodar, 350044, Russia
A. M. Patieva
Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin
Dr. Sci. (Agric.), professor, livestock products storage and processing technology department, st. Kalinina, 13, Krasnodar, 350044, Russia
D. V. Rak
Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin
student, livestock products storage and processing technology department, st. Kalinina, 13, Krasnodar, 350044, Russia
A. V. Zykova
Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin
master student, livestock products storage and processing technology department, st. Kalinina, 13, Krasnodar, 350044, Russia
References
1. Patieva A.M., Patieva S.V., Zykova A.V., Kirilyuk A.N. Rationale for the use of turkey meat in the technology of meat products. In the collection: Advanced innovative developments. Prospects and experience of use, problems of implementation in production. 2019. pp. 92–94. (in Russian).
2. Kaplin P.N. Factors influencing the formation of financial resources of OOO "Kuban-Plodoprom". Synergy of Sciences. 2019. no. 32. pp. 311–318. (in Russian).
3. Kaibysheva V.O., Kashin S.V., Mikhaleva L.M., Vidyaeva N.S. Eosinophilic esophagitis: a modern view on the problem and own clinical observations. Evidence-based gastroenterology. 2019. vol. 8. no. 1–1. pp. 58–83. (in Russian).
4. Andreev D.A., Zavyalov A.A., Kashurnikov A.Y. Key criteria for assessing the quality of oncological care: foreign experience. Russian Medical Journal. 2020. vol. 26. no. 6. pp. 421–430. (in Russian).
5. Korshunova L.G., Karapetyan R.V. Molecular genetics in poultry breeding. Ptitsevodstvo. 2018. no. 2. pp. 2–5. (in Russian).
6. Milverton J. Wiley online laibrary. The effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for juvenile-onset Pompe disease: A systematic review. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jimd.12027
7. Vockley J. Wiley online laibrary. Results from a 78 week, single-arm, open-label phase 2 study to evaluate UX007 in pediatric and adult patients with severe long-chain fatty acid oxidation disorders (LC-FAOD). Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jimd.12038
8. Novgorodova I.P., Zinovieva N.A., Gladyr E.A., Fisinin V.I. Analysis of the genetic diversity of ornamental breeds of chickens based on microsatellite markers. Achievements of Science and Technology APK. 2016. vol. 30. no. 1. pp. 69–71. (in Russian).
9. Tadano R., Nagasaka N., Goto N., Rikimaru K., Tsudzuki M. Genetic characterization and conservation priorities of chicken lines. Poult. Sci. 2013. vol. 92. no. 11. pp. 2860–2865.
10. Dymkov A.B., Rekhletskaya E.K. Studying the relationship between the egg shape index and the productivity of meat cross hens. participation. Omsk, 2015. pp. 242–247. (in Russian).
11. Yurchenko O., Makarova A., Karpukhina I., Vakhrameev A. Domestic breeds and populations of chickens. Livestock of Russia. 2017. no. 2. pp. 7–10. (in Russian).
12. Mitrofanova O.V., Dementeva N.V., Krutikova A.A., Yurchenko O.P. Association of polymorphic variants in mstn, prl, and drd2 genes with intensity of young animal growth in Pushkin breed chickens. Cytology and Genetics. 2017. vol. 51. no. 3. pp. 179–184.
13. Kudinov A.A., Dementieva N.V., Mitrofanova O.V., Stanishevskaya O.I. et al. Genome-wide association studies targeting the yield of extraembryonic fluid and production traits in Russian White chickens. BMC Genomics. 2019. vol. 20. no. 1. pp. 270. doi: 10.1186/s12864–019–5605–5
14. Bulankina A.V., Thoms S. Functions of vertebrate ferlins. Cells. 2020. vol. 9. no.3. pp. 534. doi: 10.3390/cells9030534
15. Bansal D., Miyake K., Vogel S.S., Groh S. et al. Defective membrane repair in dysferlin-deficient muscular dystrophy. Nature. 2003. vol. 423. pp. 168–172. doi: 10.1038/nature01573
16. Johnson C.P. Emerging functional differences between the synaptotagmin and ferlin calcium sensor families. Biochemistry. 2017. vol. 56. no. 49. pp. 6413–6417. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00928
17. Barkova O.Y., Krutikova A.A., Dementieva N.V. Analysis of polymorphism of the dysferlin gene in gene pool breeds of chickens. Agricultural Biology. 2021. vol. 56. no. 4. pp. 641–650. (in Russian).
18. Temiraev R.B., Baeva A.A., Osikina R.V., Viktyuk L.A. The method of improving the meat productivity of broiler chickens by feeding a probiotic. Proceedings of the Gorsky State Agrarian University. 2018. vol. 55. no. 4. pp. 145–150. (in Russian).
19. Kaloev B.S., Novikov D.D. The use of local mineralized clays in feeding laying hens to improve productive indicators. Proceedings of the Gorsky State Agrarian University. 2016. vol. 53. no. 1. pp. 63–67. (in Russian).
20. Kairov V.R., Lokhov B.R., Kozhokov M.K., Vityuk L.A. Efficiency of feeding adsorbent biosorb to broiler chickens during detoxification of alpha-toxins. Proceedings of the Gorsky State Agrarian University. 2017. vol. 54. no. 3. pp. 81–86. (in Russian).
21.
Review
For citations:
Patieva S.V., Patieva A.M., Rak D.V., Zykova A.V. Comparative characteristics of Chinese silk breed chickens and broilers. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2022;84(1):82-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2022-1-82-85
Views:
398
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
