Evaluation of the water-holding capacity of sweeteners
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2021-4-269-273
Abstract
Water-retaining capacity is an essential property for the chemical components of food products, as it refers to one of the characteristics that determine the commercial properties of products. At the same time, there are practically no data on the hydrophilicity of sweeteners in the literature; a specific criterion for assessing this property is not given. Hydrophilicity is typically defined as a techno-functional property, i.e. it is assessed for a certain food product as a whole, when replacing the classic sweetener with another, for example, cheaper. From the literature, the isopiestic method was used to assess the hydrophilicity of isomalt in comparison with sucrose. The article is devoted to choosing a parameter that can become a universal criterion for assessing the water-retaining capacity of sweeteners. The hydrophilicity of erythritol, cyclomate, glucose, sucrose, and sorbitol has been studied by isopiestic method. The gravimetrically determined area S under the isopiestic curve was used as an analytical signal to assess the hydrophilicity of sweeteners. The correlations of S with various criteria, such as the Davis and Griffin criterions, the simplified criterion for hydrophobicity, the integral Gibbs energy, and the solubility of substances in water, for assessing the hydrophilicity (hydrophobicity) of sweeteners are considered. A correlation of the area under the isopiestic curves S only with the integral Gibbs energy from all the considered criteria was shown. The data obtained allow us to recommend the integral Gibbs energy for assessing the hydrophilicity and, consequently, the water-retaining capacity of sweeteners.
About the Authors
A. V. Nikulina
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Chem.), physical and analytical chemistry department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
A. V. Arkadieva
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
student, physical and analytical chemistry department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
L. P. Bondareva
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
Cand. Sci. (Chem.), associate professor, physical and analytical chemistry department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
References
1. Arkadyeva A.V., Nikulina A.V. Determination of the hydrophilicity of sweeteners by the isopiesting method. Donetsk Readings 2020: education, science, innovations, culture and modern challenges. 2020. pp. 8-9. (in Russian).
2. Kaklyugina A.S., Chalova I.A., Shmalko N.A. Features of the development of technology for diabetic confectionery. Kazan.nauch. readings of students and graduate students. 2009. pp. 285–286. (in Russian).
3. Polyansky K.K., Rudakov O.B., Podporinova G.K., Khripushin V.V. et al. Natural and artificial sweeteners: properties and quality expertise. Moscow, Deli-Print, 2009. 252 p. (in Russian).
4. Baranov B.A., Bondarenko D.S. Kinetics of isomalt sorption and identification of its positive properties. Modern innovations. 2017. no. 1(15). pp. 16–19. (in Russian).
5. Zhabbarova S.K., Isabaev I.B., Kurbanov M.T., Alekseenko E.V. Prospective sweetener for flour confectionery. Confectionery of the XXI century. 2019. pp. 161-162. (in Russian).
6. Shimanova E.K. Low-calorie sweeteners in the technology of flour confectionery. Actual problems of youth science in the development of the agro-industrial complex. 2020. pp. 106-110. (in Russian).
7. Lazarev V.A., Ershova A.R. Properties of sweeteners in the technology of manufacturing bakery products. Food. Ecology. Quality. 2020. pp. 339-343. (in Russian).
8. Badrutdinova M.V., Borisova S.V., Mingaleeva Z.Sh., Reshetnik O.A. Studying the possibility of replacing granulated sugar with a high-tech sweetener in the production of rich bakery products. Bulletin of the Kazan Technological University. 2013. vol. 16. no. 3. (in Russian).
9. Kior A.N., Barsukova N.V. The use of sweeteners in the production of gluten-free flour products. Food technologies and biotechnologies. 2019. pp. 295-300. (in Russian).
10. Yang X., Lu Y., Hu G. Optimization of sweetener formulation in sugar-free yoghurt using response surface methodology. CyTA-Journal of Food. 2014. vol. 12. no. 2. pp. 121-126. doi: 10.1080/19476337.2013.804123
11. Ribeiro A.P.L., Guimar?es J.S., Lago A.M.T., de Angelis Pereira M.C. et al. Oat bran and sweeteners in petit-suisse cheese: Technological and nutritional properties and consumer acceptance. LWT. 2021. vol. 146. pp. 111318. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111318
12. Mummaleti G., Sarma C., Kalakandan S.K., Gazula H. et al. Characterization of levan produced from coconut inflorescence sap using Bacillus subtilis and its application as a sweetener. LWT. 2022. vol. 154. pp. 112697. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112697
13. Bielska P., Cais-Sokoli?ska D., Teichert J., Biegalski J. et al. Effect of honeydew honey addition on the water activity and water holding capacity of kefir in the context of its sensory acceptability. Scientific Reports. 2021. vol. 11. no. 1. pp. 1-9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02424-7
14. Xu D., Wang Y., Jiao N., Qiu K. et al. The coordination of dietary valine and isoleucine on water holding capacity, pH value and protein solubility of fresh meat in finishing pigs. Meat science. 2020. vol 163. pp. 108074. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108074
15. Yao S., Xie S., Jiang L., Li L. Effect of dandelion extract, sucrose and starter culture on the viscosity, water-holding capacity and pH of plain yogurt. Mljekarstvo/Dairy. 2017. vol. 67. no. 4. doi: 10.15567/mljekarstvo.2017.0408
16. Segura-Campos M., Barbosa-Mart?n E., Matus-Basto ?., Cabrera-Amaro D. et al. Comparison of chemical and functional properties of Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) varieties cultivated in Mexican Southeast. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2014. vol. 2014. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2014.53039
17. Lemus-Mondaca R., Vega-G?lvez A., Zura-Bravo L., Ah-Hen K. Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, source of a high-potency natural sweetener: A comprehensive review on the biochemical, nutritional and functional aspects. Food chemistry. 2012. vol. 132. no. 3. pp. 1121-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.11.140
18. Chattopadhyay S., Raychaudhuri U., Chakraborty R. Artificial sweeteners–a review. Journal of food science and technology. 2014. vol. 51. no. 4. pp. 611-621. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0571-1
19. Mihooliya K.N., Nandal J., Verma H., Sahoo D.K. Erythritol: A Sugar Substitute. High Value Fermentation Products: Human Health. 2019. vol. 1. pp. 265-284. doi: 10.1002/9781119460053
20. Piekara A., Krzywonos M., Szyma?ska A. Sweetening agents and sweeteners in dietary supplements for children-analysis of the polish market. Nutrients. 2020. vol. 12. no. 8. pp. 2387. doi: 10.3390/nu12082387
Review
For citations:
Nikulina A.V., Arkadieva A.V., Bondareva L.P. Evaluation of the water-holding capacity of sweeteners. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2021;83(4):269-273. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2021-4-269-273
Views:
13
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
