Investigating The Consumer Properties Of Potato Cultivars
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2023-4-49-56
Abstract
Currently, public catering establishments use technologies that do not provide for the varietal division of vegetables, in particular potatoes. This leads to excessive waste during cleaning and significant losses of nutritional value when preparing culinary products. Quick-cooking potato varieties, together with varieties of long-term processing in one culinary product, lead to the fact that half of the products are cooked, while the other half remains raw during the same time, or with longer processing. The paper considers the potato cultivars of various starch concentration grown in the central part of the country. The aim of the study is to determine the outcome of the product and the consumer properties of different potato cultivars. The objects of the investigation were the following potato cultivars: POT6 (I reproduction), POT4 (elite), POT5 (II reproduction), POT8 (II reproduction), POT3 (elite), POT12 (I reproduction), POT7 (elite), POT9 (middle early-season) and POT1 (early-season). It has been determined that POT5, POT4 and POT3 are the biggest in size (75-85 mm), but POT6 is the smallest (35 mm). But such cultivars as POT8, POT5 and POT12 are the largest in weigh (106-126 g), while POT1 and POT7 are the lightest (72 and 76 g, respectively). The potato cultivars such as POT4 (8.33%), POT12 (8.49%) and POT6 (9.1%) gave the minimum of wastes when peeling. As the investigation was carried out in April, the total amount of wastes was 5 times less if compared to the Standards of wastes and losses of food processing. It specifies the long shelflife period
About the Authors
A. T. Vasyukova
Russian Biotechnological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Engin.), professor, food industry, 11, Volokolamskoye Shosse, Moscow, 125080, Russia
A. I. Belenkov
Federal Scientific Center for Fodder Production and Agroecology named after V.R. Williams
Dr. Sci. (Biol.), professor, Perennial grass breeding department
M I. Mazirov
Russian State Agrarian University - K.A. Timiryazev MSHA
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Biol.), professor, department of agriculture and MOD, st. Timiryazevskaya, 49. Moscow 127550, Russia
О. А. Savoskina
Russian State Agrarian University - K.A. Timiryazev MSHA
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Agric.), professor, department of agriculture and MOD, st. Timiryazevskaya, 49. Moscow 127550, Russia
I. A. Zavertin
Russian State Agrarian University - K.A. Timiryazev MSHA
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Biol.), professor, department of agriculture and MOD, st. Timiryazevskaya, 49. Moscow 127550, Russia
A. V. Moshkin
LLC DoorHan
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), technology laboratory, Novaya st., 120, 1 Akulovo village, Odintsovo, Moscow region, 143002, Russia
References
1. Chashchin V.P., Gudkov А.B., Popova О.N., Odland J.Ö. et al. Description of Main Health Deterioration Risk Factors for Population Living on Territories of Active Natural Management in the Arctic. Human Ecology. 2014. no. 1. рр. 3–12. (in Russian).
2. Kontorovich A.E., Korzhubaev A.G., Eder L.V. Forecast of global energy supply: Techniques, quantitative assessments, and practical conclusions. Mineral resurses. 2006. no. 5. Available at: http://www.vipstd.ru/gim/content/view/90/278/ (in Russian).
3. Raskina T.A., Pirogova O.A., Zobnina O.V., Pintova G.A. Indicators of the osteoclastogenesis system in men with different clinical types of ankylosing spondylitis. Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2015. vol. 9. no. 2. pp.23–27. doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2015-2-23-27 (in Russian).
4. Tereshchenko Yu.V. Interpretation of main indices of heart rate variability. Proceedings of Interregional Conference “The New Medical Technology at Initial Stage of Public Care”, Omsk, 10–11 April 2010. Omsk, 2010. pp. 3–11. (in Russian).
5. Abdurakhmanov G.M., Lopatin I.K. Basics of Zoology and Zoogeography. Moscow, Akademiya, 2001. 496 p.
6. Kondrat'ev V.B. The global pharmaceutical industry. Available at: http://perspektivy.info/rus/ekob/globalnaja_farmacevticheskaja_promyshlennost_2011-07-18.html
7. State Standard 8.586.5–2005. Method of measurement. Measurement of flow rate and volume of liquids and gases by means of orifice devices. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2007. 10 p. (in Russian).
8. Pavlova M.N. Assessment of consumer properties and systematization of zoned and promising potato varieties according to areas of use for the agricultural sector. Orel, 2007. 139 p. (in Russian).
9. Savina O.V., Pavlova M.N. Evaluation of tubers of zoned and promising potato varieties for suitability for industrial processing. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference of Young Scientists and Specialists “The Contribution of Young Scientists to the Development of Agrarian Science of the 21st Century”. Ryazan, 2004. pp. 408-410. (in Russian).
10. Sharma C., Chambers IV.E., Sastry J., Sathuvalli V. et al. Development of a lexicon to describe the sensory characteristics of a wide variety of potato cultivars. Journal of Sensory Studies. 2020. vol. 35. no. 4. pp. e12577.
11. Bough R., Holm D., Sastry J. Profiling and Putative Aroma Biomarker Identification for Flavor in Potatoes using a Trained Sensory Panel and HS-SPME GC-MS. Colorado State University, 2017.
12. Oliver P., Cicerale S., Pang E., Keast R. Check all that applies as an alternative for descriptive analysis to establish flavors driving liking in strawberries. Journal of Sensory Studies. 2018. vol. 33. no. 2. pp. e12316. doi: 10.1111/joss.12316
13. Cabezas-Serrano A.B., Amodio M.L., Cornacchia R., Rinaldi R. et al. Suitability of five different potato cultivars (Solanum tuberosum L.) to be processed as fresh-cut products. Postharvest Biology and technology. 2009. vol. 53. no. 3. pp. 138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.03.009
14. Bali S., Patel G., Novy R., Vining K. et al. Evaluation of genetic diversity among russet potato clones and cultivars from breeding programs across the united states. PloS One. 2018. vol. 13. no. 8. pp. e0201415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201415
15. Morris W.L., Taylor M.A. Improving flavor to increase consumption. American Journal of Potato Research. 2019. vol. 96. pp. 195-200. doi: 10.1007/s12230-018-09702-7
16. Bowen A.J., Blake A., Tureček J., Amyotte B. External preference mapping: A guide for a consumer driven approach to apple breeding. Journal of Sensory Studies. 2019. vol. 34. no. 1. pp. e12472. doi: 10.1111/joss.12472
17. Ares G., de Andrade J.C., Antúnez L., Alcaire F. et al. Hedonic product optimisation: CATA questions as alternatives to JAR scales. Food Quality and Preference. 2017. vol. 55. pp. 67-78. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.08.011
18. Savina O.V., Markov A.I., Pavlova M.N. Productivity and directions of use of various varieties of potatoes cultivated in the conditions of the Ryazan region. Ryazan Gazette. 2005. no. 17. pp. 3-5. (in Russian).
19. Amodio M.L. et al. Implementation of rating scales for visual quality evaluation of various vegetable crops. Produce quality rating scales and color charts. Postharvest technology Center, University of California, 2007.
20. Billaud C., Roux E., Brun-Merimee S., Maraschin C. et al. Inhibitory effect of unheated and heated D-glucose, D-fructose and L-cysteine solutions and Maillard reaction product model systems on polyphenoloxidase from apple. I. Enzymatic browning and enzyme activity inhibition using spectrophotometric and polarographic methods. Food Chemistry. 2003. vol. 81. no. 1. pp. 35-50. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00376-X
21. Furrer A.N., Chegeni M., Ferruzzi M.G. Impact of potato processing on nutrients, phytochemicals, and human health. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition. 2018. vol. 58. no. 1. pp. 146-168.
22. Jaeger S.R., Antúnez L., Ares G., Swaney-Stueve M. et al. Quality perceptions regarding external appearance of apples: Insights from experts and consumers in four countries. Postharvest biology and technology. 2018. vol. 146. pp. 99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.08.014
Review
For citations:
Vasyukova A.T., Belenkov A.I., Mazirov M.I., Savoskina О.А., Zavertin I.A., Moshkin A.V. Investigating The Consumer Properties Of Potato Cultivars. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2023;85(4):49-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2023-4-49-56
Views:
251
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
