Preview

Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Advanced search

Studying factors affecting yields of toxic compounds in smoke of products made of smoking fine cut tobacco

https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2024-1-196-200

Abstract

Currently, the Russian market offers a wide range of smoking tobacco products. Cigarettes are in greatest demand. However, for many reasons, including high selling prices due to rising excise taxes, and dissatisfaction with taste characteristics, cigarette consumption is declining. There is a partial transition of consumers to other types of products, with fine-cut smoking tobacco being an alternative and obvious choice. From fine-cut smoking tobacco, consumers independently make products (roll-your-own cigarettes) of the Roll Your Own (RYO) type without a filter, wrapping a portion of tobacco with special paper manually, combining different types of tobacco, using different papers, changing the mass of tobacco and the diameter of the product, creating a product that meets taste preferences. Considering that nicotine and tar carry a toxic load for the body of consumers, it is relevant to study the content of smoke components of fine-cut smoking tobacco products (rolled tobacco), which may depend on many factors (weight of the product, diameter of the product, properties of tobacco, properties of paper). In present article technological properties of different tobacco sorts: Virginia Gold, Burley, Immuniy 580 and tobacco blend made of these sorts were examined. Composition of papers for hand made cigarettes and their air permeability were analyzed. Effect of products’ constructive properties on contents of toxic compounds in the smoke (tar, nicotine) was studied. Correlation between cigarette paper air permeability and chemical composition of the smoke was experimentally found. Utilization paper with low air permeability increases nicotine and tar content in the smoke of final product. Increasing diameter and mass of the product also leads to increasing of tar and nicotine content.

About the Authors

E. Y. Smirnova
Makhorka and Tobacco Products”
Russian Federation

graduate student, researcher, laboratory of standardization and quality, Federal State Budget Scientific Research Institute “All Russian Research Institute of Tobacco, Moskovskaya street, 42, Krasnodar, Russia, 350042, Russia



E. V. Gnuchikh
Federal State Budget Scientific Research Institute “All Russian Research Institute of Tobacco, Makhorka and Tobacco Products”

Dr. Sci. (Engin.), deputy director of research and innovation, Moskovskaya street, 42, Krasnodar, Russia, 350042, Russia



E. A. Bubnov
Federal State Budget Scientific Research Institute “All Russian Research Institute of Tobacco, Makhorka and Tobacco Products”

Cand. Sci. (Engin.), a leading researcher of the Laboratory of Machine Agro-Industrial Technologies, Moskovskaya street, 42, Krasnodar, Russia, 350042, Russia



A. A. Slavyansky
Moscow State University of Technology and Management. K.G. Razumovsky

Dr. Sci. (Engin.), professor, head of the department of innovative technologies of products from plant raw materials, Zemlyanoy Val street, 73, Moscow, 109004, Russia



References

1. Kaiserman M.J., Rickert W.S. Handmade cigarettes: it's the tube that counts. American Journal of Public Health. 1992. vol. 82. no. 1. pp. 107-109. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.1.107

2. GOST 33789–2016 (ISO 20193:2012). Tobacco and tobacco products. Determination of the width of the strands of cut tobacco. M., Standardinform, 2017. 11 p. (in Russian).

3. GOST R 53976–2010 (ISO 15592–1:2001). Fine-cut tobacco and smoking articles made from it. Methods of sampling, conditioning and analysis. Part 1: Sampling. M., Standardinform, 2010. 16 p. (in Russian).

4. GOST 32795–2014 (ISO 15592–2:2001). Fine-cut tobacco and smoking articles made from it. Methods of sampling, conditioning and analysis. Part 2: Atmosphere for conditioning and testing. M., Standardinform, 2014. 10 p. (in Russian).

5. ISO 15592–3:2008. Fine-cut tobacco and smoking articles made from it – Methods of sampling. Conditioning and analysis – Part 3: Determination of total particulate matter of smoking articles using a routine analytical smoking machine, preparation for the determination of water and nicotine. And calculation of nicotine – free dry particulate matter. (in Russian).

6. GOST R 51295–2014 (ISO 2965:2009). Materials used as cigarette papers, filter plug wrap and filter joining paper, including materials having a discrete or oriented permeable zone and materials with bands of differing permeability. Determination of air permeability. Introduced 2015–07–01. M., Standardinform, 2015. 20 p. (in Russian).

7. GOST 30571–2003 (ISO 4387:2000) / GOST R 51976–2002 (ISO 4387:2000). Cigarettes. Determination of total and nicotine-free dry particulate matter using a routine analytical smoking machine. M., Standardinform, 2005. 12 p. (in Russian).

8. GOST 30570–2015 (ISO 10315:2013). Cigarettes. Determination of nicotine in smoke condensates. Gas-chromatographic method. M., Standardinform, 2016. 8 p. (in Russian).

9. GOST 30622.1–2003 (ISO 10362–1:1999). Cigarettes. Determination of water in total particulate matter from the mainstream smoke. Part 1: Gas-chromatographic method. M., Standardinform, 2005. 8 p. (in Russian).

10. Campo San Segundo M.T. et al. Fine-cut tobacco: a priority for public health and consumer advocacy. Gaceta Sanitaria. 2011. .vol 26. no. 3. pp. 267-269. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.09.010

11. Soleimani F., Dobaradaran S., De-la-Torre G.E., Schmidt T.C. et al. Content of toxic components of cigarette, cigarette smoke vs cigarette butts: A comprehensive systematic review. Science of the Total Environment. 2022. vol. 813. pp. 152667.

12. Shihadeh A., Schubert J., Klaiany J., El Sabban M. et al. Toxicant content, physical properties and biological activity of waterpipe tobacco smoke and its tobacco-free alternatives. Tobacco control. 2015. vol. 24. no. 1. pp. i22-i30.

13. Farsalinos K.E., Gillman I.G., Melvin M.S., Paolantonio A.R. et al. Nicotine levels and presence of selected tobacco-derived toxins in tobacco flavoured electronic cigarette refill liquids. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2015. vol. 12. no. 4. pp. 3439-3452.

14. Farsalinos K.E., Gillman I.G., Melvin M.S., Paolantonio A.R. et al. Nicotine levels and presence of selected tobacco-derived toxins in tobacco flavoured electronic cigarette refill liquids. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2015. vol. 12. no. 4. pp. 3439-3452.

15. Auer R., Concha-Lozano N., Jacot-Sadowski I., Cornuz J. et al. Heat-not-burn tobacco cigarettes: smoke by any other name. JAMA internal medicine. 2017. vol. 177. no. 7. pp. 1050-1052. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1419

16. Ruprecht A.A., De Marco C., Saffari A., Pozzi P. et al. Environmental pollution and emission factors of electronic cigarettes, heat-not-burn tobacco products, and conventional cigarettes. Aerosol science and technology. 2017. vol. 51. no. 6. pp. 674-684. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2017.1300231

17. Goniewicz M.L., Knysak J., Gawron M., Kosmider L. et al. Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tobacco control. 2014. vol. 23. no. 2. pp. 133-139.

18. Mallock N., Pieper E., Hutzler C., Henkler-Stephani F. et al. Heated tobacco products: a review of current knowledge and initial assessments. Frontiers in Public Health. 2019. vol. 7. pp. 287. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00287

19. Novotny T.E., Slaughter E. Tobacco product waste: an environmental approach to reduce tobacco consumption. Current environmental health reports. 2014. vol. 1. pp. 208-216.

20. Stephens W.E. Comparing the cancer potencies of emissions from vapourised nicotine products including e-cigarettes with those of tobacco smoke. Tobacco control. 2018. vol. 27. no. 1. pp. 10-17.


Review

For citations:


Smirnova E.Y., Gnuchikh E.V., Bubnov E.A., Slavyansky A.A. Studying factors affecting yields of toxic compounds in smoke of products made of smoking fine cut tobacco. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2024;86(1):196-200. https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2024-1-196-200

Views: 223


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-910X (Print)
ISSN 2310-1202 (Online)