Preview

Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Advanced search

Features of risks assessment from the position of the behavioral economy

https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2018-1-379-384

Abstract

Subject. The article is devoted to the actual topic of modernity – risk management in terms of behavioral economics. Since the domestic theory of risk management is under development, the problem of a clear comprehensive definition of "risk" becomes now of particular relevance. Goals. The study of the mechanism of risk management in the economy from the perspective of psychology. Tasks. Review the main concepts of risk management; to study its components in business; reflect the system and principles of risk management. Methodology. Methods of cognition, retrospective and documentary analysis, as well as synthesis, generalization, systematization were used as methods for performing the work. Results. The cognitive and psychophysical factors that determine the value of choice under risk conditions, proposed by Israeli scientists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, which contributed to a fundamental breakthrough in the understanding of human behavior under uncertainty and created an economic theory of prospects, were studied. Application area. Risk management from the perspective of economic psychology. Conclusions. The psychological foundations of decision-making in risky situations play a fundamental role. In the risk there is always a certain subjective value, depending on the individual subjective assessment of probability. It is established that in most cases individuals are not prone to risk, and as a rule, an equal change in benefits and losses has unequal value for the subject, so losses, other things being equal, are experienced by the person making the decision, with great emotional costs. There is a direct relationship between the dynamics of the level of risk and the dynamics of profitability, namely: the higher the average profitability of a particular operation, the higher the risk associated with it. The level of threats in the market today is higher than the level of potential profit.

About the Authors

I. А. Kiseleva
Plekhanov Russian University of economics
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), professor, mathematical methods in economics department, Plekhanov Russian University of economics, Stremyanny alley, 36, Moscow, Russia


N. E. Simonovich
Russian State Humanitarian University
Dr. Sci. (Psych.), professor, department of personality psychology institute named after L.S. Vygotsky, Miusskaya sq., 6, Moscow, Russia


E. V. Asmolova
Voronezh state university of engineering technologies
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), associate professor, service and restaurant, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia


Yu. A. Shapovalov
Voronezh state university of engineering techno-logies
student, technology of animal products, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia


References

1. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.  Econometrica, 1979.

2. Tversky A. Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1992.

3. Ilyin E.P. Psikhologiya riska [Psychology of risk] Moscow, Peter, 2012. 156 p. (in Russian)

4. Kahneman D. Dumai medlenno [Think slowly ... Design quickly] Moscow, AST, 2014. 427 p. (in Russian).

5. Bernoulli D. Specimen theoriae novae de mensurasortis.  Commentarii academiae imperialis petropolitanae. 1738. vol. 5. pp. 175–192.

6. Avtonomov V.S. Chelovek v zerkale ekonomicheskoi teorii [Man in the Mirror of Economic Theory: (Essays on the History of Zap.ekon.)] Moscow, Nauka, 1993. 175 p. (in Russian)

7. Kozeletsky Yu. Psikhologicheskaya teoriya reshenii [The psychological theory of solutions] Moscow, Progress, 1979. 504 p. (in Russian)

8. Kiseleva I.A., Simonovich N.E. Risk assessment taking into account the influence of the human factor. Ekonomicheskii analiz [Economic analysis: theory and practice] 2014. no. 2 (353). pp. 21-27. (in Russian)

9. Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. Teoriya igr I ekonomicheskoe povedenie [Theory of games and economic behavior] Moscow, Nauka, 1970. 708 p. (in Russian)

10. Vyatkin VN, Gamza VA, Majewski F.V. Risk-menedzhment [Risk management] Moscow, Yurayt, 2015. 352 p. (in Russian

11. Chereshkin D.S. Upravlenie riskami I bezopasnost’yu [Risk and security management] Moscow, URSS Publishing Group, 2010. 200 p. (in Russian)

12.

13. Akaev A.A. et al. Proekty I riski budushchego [Projects and risks of the future: concepts, models, tools, forecasts] Moscow, URSS Publishing Group, 2011. 432 p. (in Russian).

14. Covello V.T., Mumpower J. Risk Analysis and Risk Management: An Historical Perspective. Risk Analysis. 1985. vol. 5. no. 2. pp. 103–120.

15. Arrow K. Perception of risk in psychology and economics. Thesis [THESIS] 1994. no. 5. pp. 81-90. (in Russian)

16. Ringland D. Future as an unknown space: integration of foresight in strategic decision making. Forsait [Foresight] 2013. vol. 7. no. 4. pp. 60-69. (in Russian)

17. Saritas O. Technologies of human perfection: prospects and challenges. Forsait [Foresight] 2013. vol. 7. no. 1. pp. 6-13. (in Russian)

18. Dubrov AM, Lagosha BA, Khrustalev E.Yu. Modelirovanie riskovykh situatsii [Modeling of risk situations in economy and business] Moscow, Finance and Statistics, 2003. 222 p. (in Russian)

19. Tutova N.A. Each type of risk must be kept under strict control. Bankovskie tekhnologii [Banking Technologies] 2013. no. 04. pp. 30. (in Russian)

20. Kiseleva IA, Simonovich NE Decision making in risk: psychological aspects. Finansovaya analitika [Financial analytics: problems and solutions] 2014. no. 18. pp. 23-29. (in Russian)

21. Algin A.P. Grani ekonomicheskogo riska [The edges of economic risk] Moscow, Knowledge, 1991. 187 p. (in Russian)

22. Vaugham E.J. Risk management. N.Y., Wiley, 1997. 255 p.

23. Mistrov L. E., Derkanosova A. A. Methods of informational influence in the synthesis of control strategies for the stability of socio-economic organizations. Vestnik VGUIT [Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies] 2013. no. 4 (58). pp. 282-288. (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Kiseleva I.А., Simonovich N.E., Asmolova E.V., Shapovalov Yu.A. Features of risks assessment from the position of the behavioral economy. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2018;80(1):379-384. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2018-1-379-384

Views: 658


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-910X (Print)
ISSN 2310-1202 (Online)