Accounting technique of the three-component indicator of the financial situation type in the analysis of the food industry enterprises capital structure
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2018-4-388-397
Abstract
About the Authors
A. I. HorevDr. Sci. (Econ.), professor, economic security and financial monitoring department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
S. V. Bukharin
Dr. Sci. (Engin.), professor, economic security and financial monitoring department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
V. N. Ponomareva
student, economic security and financial monitoring department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
References
1. Berdnikov V.V., Gavel O.Yu. Comparative analysis of approaches of forecasting of probability of bankruptcy of the commercial organizations. Nauka i Mir [Science and World]. 2014. no. 8. pp. 92–96. (in Russian).
2. Bordeianu G.D. et al. Analysis Models of the Bankruptcy Risk. Economy Transdiscipli-narity Cognition. 2011. vol. 14. no. 1. pp. 248–259.
3. Kosmina O.I. Comparative characteristic of various techniques of diagnostics of a financial condition of the enterprises. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov SevKavGTU. Seriya: Ehkonomika [Collection of scientific works of the North Caucasus State Technical University. Series: Economy]. 2010. no. 10. pp. 21–28. (in Russian).
4. Alferina O.N., Kazakov S.V. Analysis of structure of the capital and increase in financial stability of the enterprise. Innovacionnaya nauka [Innovative science]. 2015. no. 6. pp. 4–11. (in Russian).
5. Polyakov K., Polyakova M. The role of financial factors interactions in the capital structure determination. Journal of corporate finance research. 2015. no. 4 (36). pр. 17–25.
6. Witten I.H., Frank E., Hall M.A. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Burlington, Massachusetts, Morgan Kaufmann, 2011. 664 p.
7. Chambers. J.M. Software for Data Analysis. Stanford, Stanford University, 2008. 514 p. doi: 10.1007/978–0–387–75936–4.
8. Saaty T.L. Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process. RACSAM – Journal of the Royal Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences. Series A. Mathematics. 2008. vol. 102. no. 2. pp. 251–318. doi: 10.1007/BF03191825
9. Horev A.I., Bukharin S.V., Barkalova I.I. The generalized indicator and classification of structure of the capital of the industrial enterprises. Vestnik VGUIT [Proceedings of VSUET]. 2017. vol.79. no. 3 (73). pp. 187–193. (in Russian).
10. Bukharin S.V., Melnikov A.V. Cluster and hierarchical methods of examination of economic objects. Voronezh, Nauchnaya kniga, 2012. 276 p. (in Russian).
11. Barmin M.A. Probabilistic model of communication of enterprise competitiveness with the parameters of intellectual capital. Vestnik NGIEHI [Herald NGIEI]. 2016. no. 9 (64). pp. 155-161. (in Russian).
12. Igoshin A.N., Cheremuhin A.D. Features of the reproduction of human capital in the context of assessing the effectiveness of the organization. Vestnik NGIEHI [Herald NGIEI]. 2017. no. 5 (72). pp. 96-113. (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Horev A.I., Bukharin S.V., Ponomareva V.N. Accounting technique of the three-component indicator of the financial situation type in the analysis of the food industry enterprises capital structure. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2018;80(4):388-397. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2018-4-388-397