Under conditions of increasing of industrial consumption of sugar in Russia and applying specific requirements for sugar as primary commodity, issues of flexibility and readjustment of process lines for production of sugar of prescribed properties become relevant. Maintaining the quality and safety of products in this case can be ensured by the transition of the process control system to a new paradigm, including the improvement of tools in the form of measurement methods. As a basis for the methodology of forming the system of control methods, three principles have been proposed: the package principle, the acquisition of standard and extended case methods, and the unification of methods presentation. The package principle as a tool of the rule-making methodology, with its detailed elaboration in standardization, has been considered in detail. It is shown that in order to ensure the compatibility of operational control methods, it makes sense to provide unified approaches to their development, essential content, construction and presentation, which is possible by adopting the package principle used in standardization. The necessity of expanding the nomenclature of control parameters of the technological flow of sugar production was considered in detail; the existing prerequisites were shown. It was proposed to provide the implementation of nomenclature variations of control parameters on the basis of the formation of two case methods, differentiated according to the destination of the sugar produced - for population or industrial consumers. It is noted that control parameters of the technological flow of sugar production are the quantities related to the subject of quantitative chemical analysis, the practical side of which is reflected by analytical methods. Due to the current variety of attributes of methods presentation, their harmonization is required both by means of the unification of the presentation of measurement methods of the same parameters for different control objects according to their substantive essence, and by means of the unification of the text presentation of the methodology. The principles considered together constitute the essence of the methodological approach to the formation of the system of control methods of the technological sugar production flow.

sugar production, control of technological flow, control parameter, measurement methods, package principle, case, unification, presentation

1. Augustin M.A., Riley M., Stockmann R. et al. Role of food processing in food and nutrition security. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2016. vol. 56. рр. 115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.08.005.

2. Lim S.A.H., Antony J. Statistical proctss control readiness in the food industry: Development of a self-assessment tool. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2016. vol. 58. рр. 133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.10.025.

3. Egorova M.I., Rajnik V.V., Kretova Ya. A. Information technologies as a tool for assessing technological opportunities of the line in obtaining sugar with specified characteristics. Scientific works SKFNTSSVV. 2018. vol. 21. pp. 124–128. doi: 10.30679/2587–9847–2018–21–124–128. (in Russian).

4. Matison V.A. Quality Control of Raw Materials and Finished Products in the Food Industry. Food industry. 2016. no. 7. pp. 8–11. (in Russian).

5. Shelehova N.V., Poljakov V.A. Rimareva L.V. Comprehensive Control System of Production of Ethyl Alcohol and Alcoholic Beverages. Storage and processing of agricultural raw materials. 2015. no. 12. pp. 53–56. (in Russian).

6. Egorova M.I. A new paradigm in the system of technological control of sugar production. Innovative processes in food technology: materials from the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Moscow, 19–20 February 2019. Moscow, VNIIZ, 2019. pp. 140–145. (in Russian).

7. Ponomareva O.B., Kotov M.V. Assessmentof the quality measurements of food products by means the inter-laboratory comparative tests. Food industry. 2018. no. 9. pp. 70–73. (in Russian)

8. Medrish M.E., Abramova I.M., Savel'eva V.B. et al. Quality control of distilled spirits. Food industry. 2019. no. 4. pp. 60–61. doi: 10.24411/0235–2486–2019–10004. (in Russian).

9. Shelehova N.V., Shelehova T.M., Skvorcova L.I et al. Modern condition and prospects of development of quality control of alcohol products. Food industry. 2019. no. 4. pp. 117–119. doi: 10.24411/0235–2486–2019–10059. (in Russian).

10. Serba E.M., Overchenko M.B., Ignatova N.I. et al. On the issue about quality control of enzyme preparations for the food industry. Food industry. 2019. no. 4. pp. 87–88. doi: 10.24411/0235–2486–2019–10044. (in Russian).

11. Sapronov N.M., Beljaeva L.I., Smirnova L.Yu. et al. Conceptual principles of the system through the control of sugar beet for sugar production. Food. Ecology. Quality: proceedings from the Internationai Scientific and Practical Conference, Novosibirsk, 18–19 March 2016. Novosibirsk, 2016. vol. 3. pp. 164–168. (in Russian).

12. Aronov I.Z., Zazhigalkin A.V., Rakov A.V. et al. The “Package principle” of developing standards is an undeservedly forgotten technology of planning in the field of standardization. Standards and quality. 2015. no. 8 (938). pp. 24–30. (in Russian).

13. Krikun T.I. The package principle and barriers in the field of technical regulation of food products. Food Ingredients of the 21st Century: collection of reports from the International Forum, Moscow, 18–21 March 2014. Moscow, 2014. pp. 10–13. (in Russian).

14. Belyaeva L.I., Labuzova V.N., Ostapenko A.V. et al. Technological supportive means in production of sugar: from local technologies of application to integrated. Sugar. 2017. no. 3. pp. 23–27. (in Russian).

15. Soon J.M., Saguy I.S. Crowdsourcing: A new conceptual view for food safety and quality. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2017. vol. 66. рp. 63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.05.013.

16. Donskova L.A. Methodological aspects of food quality expertise in domestic and foreign practice: comparative analysis. International Research Journal. 2017. no. 12–3. pp. 25–29. doi: 10.23670/IRJ.2017.66.209. (in Russian).

17. Arhangel’skaja E.A., Zamorenova E.L. GOST R ISO 5725 statements compliance for the estimate accuracy of measurements results. Analytics and control. 2017. vol. 21. no. 4. pp. 322–331. doi: 10.15826/analitika.2017.21.4.001. (in Russian).

18. Sakayeva I.V., Lutceva A.I., Vaganova O.V. et al. The description of hplc methods in drug quality standards. Bulletin SCEEMP. 2014. no. 1. pp. 4–14. (in Russian).