Preview

Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Advanced search

Development of a sensory profile for a new type of processed fruit and berry products

https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2020-2-116-123

Abstract

The article considers the principle of developing a list of descriptors to describe the sensory characteristics of processed fruit and berry products as a result of osmotic dehydration with hypertonic sucrose solution. The analytical method of organoleptic analysis - the quantitative descriptive method, was used to determine significant characteristics. Initially, the testers compiled a preliminary list of descriptors for processed products, including 54 characteristics, which are divided into groups: consistency, appearance, taste, color and aroma. After deleting synonyms, antonyms, and hedonic descriptors, there are 12 descriptive characteristics left in the list. The following descriptors were identified: integrity of form, gloss, brightness of color, consistency: dense, juicy, soft, tender, watery, chewable, sticky, taste: pronounced varietal, sweet and sour taste, intense and extraneous aroma. After discussion between the testers and the head of research for unambiguous understanding of the descriptive characteristics was carried out studies of samples of berry, fruit products and structured reference profilograms frozen and frozen sweet berries and dried reference and dried fruit production. As a result of the organoleptic evaluation, it was found that all processed berries and fruits have a well-preserved consistency, appearance, taste, aroma and color. Levels of density, richness was appreciated, preserved the integrity of the form, pronounced colouring, no foreign flavor, taste of berries meets the variety, berries are delicate compared to a control sample. Thus the organoleptic quality assessment of processed fruit products showed that pre-osmotic dehydration with sucrose solutions for further processes such as freezing and drying have allowed for some handles to protect the structure of fruit and berry raw materials and does not negatively affect the indicators of appearance, consistency, taste, color and aroma, and improved their quality compared to traditional frozen or dried fruit and berry production.

About the Authors

N. A. Gribova
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), associate professor, catering business department, Stremyanny lane 36, Moscow, 117997, Russia


L. V. Berketova
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), associate professor, catering business department, Stremyanny lane 36, Moscow, 117997, Russia


References

1. Duborasova T.Yu. Sensory analysis of food products. Moscow, Publishing and trading company “Dashkov and Co”, 2009. 184 p. (in Russian).

2. Piana M-L., Persano Oddo L., Bentabol A., Bruneau E. et al. Sensory analysis applied to honey: state of the art 1. Apidologie. 2004. no. 35. pp. S26 S37. doi: 10.1051/apido:2004048

3. Medoro С., Cianciabella M., Camilli F., Magli M. et al. Sensory Profile of Italian Craft Beers, Beer Taster Expert versus Sensory Methods: A Comparative Study. Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2016. vol. 7 (6). doi:10.4236/ФНС.2016.76047

4. Damaziak K., Stelmasiak A., Riedel J., Zdanowska-S?siadek ?. et al. Sensory evaluation of poultry meat: A comparative survey of results from normal sighted and blind people. PLOS ONE. 2019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210722

5. Inerbayeva I.A., Bokova T.I., Zheltysheva O.S. Organoleptic evaluation of meat minced semi-finished products with fruit and berry additives. Food industry. 2009. no. 12. pp. 47–49. (in Russian).

6. Kanter V.M., Mathison V.A., Fomenko M.A. Organoleptic analysis of food products. Moscow, Publishing complex MGUPP, 2001. 151p. (in Russian).

7. Sherpa N.D., Bhutia K.D., Sherpa Pradhan H.P. A Sensory Evaluation and Overall Acceptance of Processed Products of Underutilised Fruits of Sikkim Himalayas. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 2018. vol. 31(1). рp. 1–4. doi:10.9734/CJAST/2018/45858

8. Luz L.N., Vettorazzi D.A., Julio C.F., Deisy L. Sensory acceptance and qualitative analysis of fruits in papaya hybrids. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ci?ncias. 2018. vol. 90 (4). рp. 3693–3703. doi:10.1590/0001–3765201820170111

9. Resende J.T., Camargo L.K., Argando?a E.J., Camargo C.K. Sensory analysis and chemical characterization of strawberry fruits. Hortic Bras 2008. vol. 26. рp. 371–374. doi:10.1590/S0102–05362008000300015

10. Branco I.G. Sanjinez-Argando?a E.J., Silva M.M., Paula T.M. Avalia??o sensorial e estabilidade f?sico-qu?mica de um blend de laranja e cenoura. Ci?ncia e Tecnologia de Alimentos Campinas. 2007. vol. 27. no. 1. pp. 7–12. doi: 10.1590/S0101–20612007000100002 (in Portuguese).

11. Morzelle M.C., Souza E.C., Assump??o C.F., Vilas Boas B.M. Desenvolvimento e avalia??o sensorial de n?ctar misto de maracuj? (Sims) e araticum (Passiflora edulisAnnona crassiflora, Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais). Campina Grande. 2011. vol. 13. no. 2. pp. 131–135. Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Desenvolvimento-e-avalia??o-f?sico-qu?mica-de-misto-Agroecologia-Cient?fico/26106e13aa506add40fe0e85ab8705b59c6fa6bb (in Portuguese).

12. Smirnova E.A., Berketova L.V., Khurshudyan S.A. Nomenclature of sensory characteristics of juice products. Beer and drinks. 2010. no. 3. pp. 41–44. (in Russian).

13. Cheong M.W., Liu S.Q., Zhou W., Curran P. et al. Chemical composition and sensory profile of pomelo (Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck) juice. Food Chemistry. 2012. vol. 135 (4). doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.012

14. Andreu-Sevilla A.J., Mena P., Mart? N., Garc?a Viguera C. et al. Volatile composition and descriptive sensory analysis of pomegranate juice and wine. Food Research International. 2014. vol. 3 (1). doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.07.007

15. GOST ISO 13299–2015. Organoleptic analysis. Methodology. General guide to the preparation of an organoleptic profile. Moscow, Standardform, 2016. 24 p. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200137276 (in Russian).

16. GOST ISO 6658–2016. Organoleptic analysis. Methodology. General guide. Moscow, Standardform, 2016. 21 p. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200139405 (in Russian).

17. GOST ISO 8586–2015. Organoleptic analysis. General guidelines for the selection, training and monitoring of selected testers and test experts (with Amendments). Moscow, Standardform, 2015. 60 p. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200122443 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Gribova N.A., Berketova L.V. Development of a sensory profile for a new type of processed fruit and berry products. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2020;82(2):116-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2020-2-116-123

Views: 513


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-910X (Print)
ISSN 2310-1202 (Online)