Method of forming strategic alternatives for the development of subsidiaries and choosing the optimal strategy for each of them
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2020-3-239-245
Abstract
The article examines the methodology for the formation of strategic alternatives to the activities of a subsidiary and the choice of a strategy for its development, operating in a narrow market segment and included in an integrated structure. The proposed methodology should differ from the methodology for developing an autonomous operating enterprise, since the main task of a subsidiary is to obtain additional competitive advantages to the existing ones mainly by entering an integrated structure, which can be provided by a competitive strategy focused on costs or differentiation. The possibility of implementing a benchmark strategy of concentrated and diversified growth is considered. An expanded scheme for the formation of alternative development strategies for subsidiaries in the form of a combination of growth strategies and competitive strategies in their classical definition is presented. After the formation of alternative strategies of the subsidiary, the main task is to select the optimal development strategy for the enterprise from among the alternative, which will allow, by establishing relationships between the enterprises, to obtain the maximum possible competitive advantages. The authors have worked out the technique of choosing the optimal strategy for the development of a subsidiary from among alternative strategies to maximize competitive advantages
About the Authors
V. G. Lutchenko
JSC «VSRI «Vega»
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), deputy head of system analysis, Moscow Avenue, 7-B, Voronezh, 394026, Russia
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), deputy head of system analysis, Moscow Avenue, 7-B, Voronezh, 394026, Russia
A. I. Khorev
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), professor, economic security and financial monitoring department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), professor, economic security and financial monitoring department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
I. A. Khorev
JSC VSRI Vega
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), chief specialist of the department of system analysis, Moscow Avenue, 7-B, Voronezh, 394026, Russia
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), chief specialist of the department of system analysis, Moscow Avenue, 7-B, Voronezh, 394026, Russia
V. V. Grigorieva
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor, economic security and financial monitoring department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor, economic security and financial monitoring department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
T. V. Lutchenko
JSC Concern Sozvezdie
lead economist, ,, st. Plekhanovskaya, 14, Voronezh, 394036, Russia
lead economist, ,, st. Plekhanovskaya, 14, Voronezh, 394036, Russia
References
1. Porter M. Competitive Advantage. How to achieve a high result and ensure its stability. Moscow, Alpina Business Books, 2006. (in Russian).
2. Porter M. Methods of analysis of industries and competitors. Moscow, Alpina Business Books, 2005. (in Russian).
3. Paterson S.L., Brock D.M. The development of subsidiary-management research: review and theoretical analysis. International Business Review. 2002. vol. 11. no. 2. pp. 139–163. doi: 10.1016/S0969-5931(01)00053-1
4. Scott P., Gibbons P., Coughlan J. Developing subsidiary contribution to the MNC – Subsidiary entrepreneurship and strategy creativity. Journal of International Management. 2010. vol. 16. no. 4. pp. 328–339. doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2010.09.004
5. Gammelgaard J. et al. Effective autonomy, organisational relationships and skilled jobs in subsidiaries. Management Research Review. 2011. vol. 34. no. 4. pp. 366-385. doi: 10.1108/01409171111117834
6. Valitov S.M., Khakimov A.K. Innovative potential as a framework of innovative strategy for enterprise development. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015. vol. 24. pp. 716–721. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00682-6
7. Shtefan V.I., Shtefan E.V., Lutchenko V.G., Lutchenko T.V. Formation of an enterprise development strategy included in an integrated structure. Voronezh, VNII "Vega",2016. (in Russian).
8. Shtefan V.I., Shtefan E.V., Lutchenko V.G., Lutchenko T.V. Methodological aspects of the formation and implementation of the development strategy of the integrated structure and its subsidiaries. Voronezh, VNII "Vega", 2017. (in Russian).
9. Jovanovic M. et al. Paths to service capability development for servitization: Examining an internal service ecosystem. Journal of Business Research. 2019. vol. 104. pp. 472-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.015
10. Marchini P. L., Mazza T., Medioli A. Corruption and sustainable development: The impact on income shifting in European international groups. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2020. vol. 27. no. 2. pp. 717-730. doi: 10.1002/csr.1839
11. Vyzhitovich A.M., Skorlygina E.A. Internal audit system of an autonomous institution. Vestnik NSUEM. 2018. no. 1. pp. 122-130. (in Russian).
12. Titov V.V., Bezmelnitsyn D.A. Modeling of planning the development of high-tech business in an industrial cluster. Vestnik NSUEM. 2018. no. 2. pp. 20-32.
Review
For citations:
Lutchenko V.G., Khorev A.I., Khorev I.A., Grigorieva V.V., Lutchenko T.V. Method of forming strategic alternatives for the development of subsidiaries and choosing the optimal strategy for each of them. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2020;82(3):239-245. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2020-3-239-245
Views:
622
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
