Effect of the cooking method on the composition of young light beer
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2024-1-144-154
Abstract
Currently, beer producers are faced with the problem of price/quality ratio when working with domestic malt and hops. Therefore, it becomes relevant to study technological methods that affect raw materials in order to regulate the quality indicators of finished products. A comparative analysis of the amino acid composition and aromatic profiles of young light beer from barley malt, obtained by fermentation with bottom and top yeast using various methods of decoction mashing, was carried out. The objects of the study were the following samples: 1 – mashing by decoction with an additional β-amylase pause, fermentation with grassroots yeast of the SafLagerW 34/70 race; 2 – mashing using the classic decoction method, fermentation with bottom yeast, race SafLagerW 34/70 (control 1); 3 – mashing using the classic decoction method, fermentation with top yeast, race SafAleT 58 (control 2); 4 – mashing by decoction with an additional β-amylase pause, fermentation with top yeast of the SafAleT 58 race. In the resulting samples, the mass concentrations of amino acids, esters and higher alcohols that influence the formation of the aromatic profile were determined. In samples of young beer fermented with lager yeast of the SafLagerW 34/70 race, it was observed that in sample 1 the ethyl acetate content was 20 mg/dm3, which is 2 times more than in sample 2. At the same time, when studying samples of young beer, obtained by fermentation with SafAleT 58 ale yeast, in sample 4 the ethyl acetate content was 49.1 mg/dm3, which is 2 times higher than control sample 3. Based on the results obtained, conclusions were drawn about the possibility of using single-decoction mashing with an additional β-amylase pause in the technology light beer made from barley malt.
About the Authors
I. V. Oseledtseva
Kuban State Technological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Engin.), associate professor, winemaking and fermentation technology named after prof. A.A. Merzhanian department, 2 Moskovskaya St., Krasnodar, 350072, Russia
M. A. Nazarenko
Kuban State Technological University
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), associate professor, winemaking and fermentation technology named after prof. A.A. Merzhanian department, 2 Moskovskaya St., Krasnodar, 350072, Russia
K. A. Palagin
Kuban State Technological University
graduate student, winemaking and fermentation technology named after prof. A.A. Merzhanian department, 2 Moskovskaya St., Krasnodar, 350072, Russia
D. K. Khanin
Kuban State Technological University
master student, winemaking and fermentation technology named after prof. A.A. Merzhanian department, 2 Moskovskaya St., Krasnodar, 350072, Russia
A. E. Chusova
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
Cand. Sci. (Engin.), associate professor, fermentation and sugar production technology department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
A. S. Kiselev
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
master student, fermentation and sugar production technology department, Revolution Av., 19 Voronezh, 394036, Russia
References
1. Bettenhausen H.M. et al. Influence of malt source on beer chemistry, flavor, and flavor stability. Food research international. 2018. vol. 113. pp. 487-504.
2. Kobelev K.V., Gernet M.V., Gribkova I.N., Lazareva I.V. Study of the influence of the composition of raw materials on the quality and safety of finished beer. Part III. Influence of the composition of grain and sugar-containing raw materials on the content of organic acids and carbohydrates in beer. Beer and drinks. 2015. no. 4. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/issledovanie-vliyaniya-sostava-ishodnogo-syrya-na-kachestvo-i-bezopasnost-gotovogo-piva-chast-iii-vliyanie-sostava-zernovogo-i/viewer
3. Koller H., B. Perkins L. Brewing and the Chemical Composition of Amine-Containing Compounds in Beer. Foods 2022. vol. 11. no. 3. doi: 10.3390/foods11030257
4. Meledina T.V., Dedegkaev A.T., Afonin D.V. Beer quality: stability of taste and aroma, colloidal stability, tasting. St. Petersburg, Profession, 2011. 220 p. (in Russian).
5. Narcissus L. A short course in brewing. St. Petersburg, Profession, 2007. 640 p. (in Russian).
6. Kuntze V., Mit G. Technology of malt and beer. St. Petersburg, Profession, 2001. 912 p. (in Russian).
7. Rodrigues F., Caldeira M., Câmara J.S. Development of a dynamic headspace solid-phase microextraction procedure coupled to GC–qMSD for evaluation the chemical profile in alcoholic beverages. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2008. vol. 609. no. 1. pp. 82-104.
8. Olaniran A.O., Hiralal L., Mokoena M.P., Pillay B. et al. Flavour‐active volatile compounds in beer: production, regulation and control. Journal of the Institute of Brewing. 2017. vol. 123. no. 1. pp. 13-23. doi: 10.1002/jib.389
9. Baiano A. Craft beer: An overview. Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety. 2021. vol. 20. no. 2. pp. 1829-1856. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12693
10. Rodrigues F., Caldeira M., Camara J.S. Development of a dynamic headspace solid-phase microextraction procedure coupled to GC–qMSD for evaluation the chemical profile in alcoholic beverages. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2008. vol. 609. pp. 82–104.
11. Saerens S.M.G., Delvaux F., Verstrepen K.J., van Dijck P. et al. Parameters affecting ethyl ester production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008. vol. 74. pp. 454–461.
12. Pires E.J., Teixeira J.A., Brányik T., Vicente A.A. Yeast: The soul of beer’s aroma—A review of flavour-active esters and higher alcohols produced by the brewing yeast. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2014. vol. 98. pp. 1937-1949. Available at: esearchgate.net/publication/259566009
13. Betancur M.I., Motoki K., Spence C., Velasco C. Factors influencing the choice of beer: A review. Food Research International. 2020. vol. 137. pp. 109367.
14. Ferreira I.M., Guido L.F. Impact of wort amino acids on beer flavour: A review. Fermentation. 2018. vol. 4. no. 2. pp. 23. doi: 10.3390/fermentation4020023
15. Humia B.V., Santos K.S., Barbosa A.M., Sawata M. et al. Beer molecules and its sensory and biological properties: A review. Molecules. 2019. vol. 24. no. 8. pp. 1568. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31009997/
16. Zipaev D.V., Nikitchenko N.V., Kashaev A.G., Platonov I.A. et al. Study of quality indicators of light beer obtained using malt from triticale. News of higher educational institutions. Food technology. 2015. no. 5-6. pp. 77-79. (in Russian).
17. Kharlamova L.N., Volkova T.N., Lazareva I.V., Selina I.V. et al. Study of the content of volatile components and glycerol in beer and beer drinks. Food Industry. 2020. no. 8. pp. 48–51. (in Russian).
18. Ponomareva O.I., Borisova E.V., Prokhorchik I.P. Lactic acid bacteria of the genus Lactobacillus in the formation of the flavor and aroma profile of sour ales. Equipment and technology of food production. 2018. vol. 48. no. 2. pp. 100-108. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/molochnokislye-bakterii-roda-lactobacillus-v-formirovanii-vkusoaromaticheskogo-profilya-kislyh-eley/viewer (in Russian).
19. Saifullina R.F., Matushkina E.V. Study of the quality of light beer of domestic and imported production. Youth and Science. 2015. no. 1. pp. 21-21. (in Russian).
20. Zhukov R.B. Physico-chemical indicators of beer quality. Innovative technologies of food production. 2020. pp. 172-175. (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Oseledtseva I.V., Nazarenko M.A., Palagin K.A., Khanin D.K., Chusova A.E., Kiselev A.S. Effect of the cooking method on the composition of young light beer. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2024;86(1):144-154. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2024-1-144-154
Views:
248
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
