Verification of a mathematical model for the territorial distribution of potato farming (case study of Russian regions)
https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2026-2-
Abstract
The article presents the results of an empirical verification of a previously developed mathematical model that allows predicting the efficiency of potato production in different regions, taking into account agroclimatic and macroeconomic factors. Based on data from 23 regions of Central Russia for 2000–2023, a strong correlation was established between the relative cost calculated by the model and the actual dynamics of potato gross harvests. It has been confirmed that the optimum zone for commercial potato farming has shifted to the Bryansk, Tula, and Nizhny Novgorod regions, which is consistent with the model's theoretical conclusions regarding changes in climatic conditions. The obtained results testify to the high prognostic value of the model and the possibility of its use for strategic planning in the agro-industrial complex. The paper provides a detailed analysis of global potato production trends for the period 2000–2024. It shows that Russia, following the global trend in developed countries, reduced its gross harvest by 37.4%, while simultaneously decreasing the sown area from 2.834 million hectares to 1.075 million hectares. Profound regional differentiation is revealed: against the backdrop of a general decline, three regions (Bryansk, Tula, and Nizhny Novgorod Oblasts) demonstrated production growth of 179.3%, 125.7%, and 114.3%, respectively. It is established that it is in these regions that the share of private household plots in the gross harvest is minimal (from 12.4% to 36.2%), indicating the industrialization of potato farming. The determination coefficient (R² = 0.7312) confirms that the model explains more than 73% of the variance in regional changes. The extreme drought of 2010 served as a natural experiment: in the Bryansk region, crop yields declined by only 17.5% (compared to an average decline of 38% for the Central Federal District), confirming the adequacy of the moisture availability and drought risk factors factored into the model. The verification results allow the model to be recommended for substantiating investment decisions, assessing the effectiveness of government support, and developing strategies for the spatial distribution of potato farming in a changing climate.
About the Authors
V. N. OzherelyevBryansk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Agric.), professor, technical systems in agribusiness, environmental management and road construction department, Sovetskaya str., 2a, Kokino village, 243365, Russia
A. O. Nikitina
Cand. Sci (Econ.), associate professor, computer technologies and systems department, 50 let Oktyabrya Boulevard, 7, Bryansk, 241035, Russia
References
1. Crops and livestock products. FAOSTAT. Available at: https://www.fao.org/faostat/ru/#data/QCL (accessed 05.01.2026).
2. A new approach: "Kilocalories per hectare" as a criterion of agricultural efficiency. Potato System. Available at: https://potatosystem.ru/novyj-podhod-kilokalorii-s-gektara-kak-kriterij-effektivnosti-selskogo-hozyajstva/ (accessed 08.01.2026) (in Russian).
3. Kholodova M.A. Diagnostics of conditions for spatial distribution of crop production industry. Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2022. no. 5 (220). pp. 93–102. doi: 10.32417/1997-4868-2022-220-05-93-102 (in Russian).
4. Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators. 2025: Statistical collection. Moscow: Rosstat, 2025. 1035 p. (in Russian).
5. Farm Facts. Washington: American Farm Bureau Federation, 1995. 26 p.
6. Sepp Yu.V., Tooming Kh.G. Productivity resources of potatoes. Leningrad: Gidrometizdat, 1991. 261 p. (in Russian).
7. Kostyaev A.I., Nikonova G.N. Features of modern placement of agricultural production in the Russian Non-Black Earth Region. Bulletin of the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University. Series: Natural and Medical Sciences. 2022. no. 3. pp. 5–20. (in Russian).
8. Neganova V.P., Chistyakov Yu.F., Drokin V.V. et al. Competitiveness of regional agri-food systems: a theoretical review. Economy of Regions. 2021. vol. 17. no. 1. pp. 329–353. doi: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-1-23 (in Russian).
9. Shaibakova L.F., Morozova G.M., Gromova N.S., Gusev A.S. Trends and problems of organic potato growing development in Russia. International Agricultural Journal. 2025. no. 5. pp. 596–600. (in Russian).
10. Kireicheva L.V., Timoshkin A.D., Avetisyan A.L. Information and reference system of agroclimatic and soil indicators of the Non-Chernozem zone of the Russian Federation. International Agricultural Journal. 2022. no. 3. p. 18. (in Russian).
11. Shulmeister K.G. Drought control and harvest. 2nd ed., revised and expanded. Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1988. 263 p. (in Russian).
12. Semenov S.M., Popova E.N., Popov I.O. Assessment of changes in the annual sum of active temperatures and precipitation during the growing season for the territory of Russia and neighboring countries. Meteorology and Hydrology. 2018. no. 6. pp. 98–105. (in Russian).
13. Ozherelyev V.N., Ozherelyeva M.V., Fedkova N.A. Climate change as a factor in forecasting the territorial localization of Russian potato growing. Economic Sciences. 2022. no. 209. pp. 154–160. (in Russian).
14. Sown areas of agricultural crops in the Bryansk region for the 2024 harvest: spring survey. Territorial Body of Rosstat for the Bryansk Region. Available at: https://32.rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Sev2024.pdf (accessed: 10.01.2026) (in Russian).
15. Ivanyo Y., Fedurina N., Varanitsa-Gorodovskaya Z. Mathematical models of agricultural production management in high risk environments. E3S Web of Conferences. 2020. vol. 222. article 01018. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202022201018.
16. Ushachev I.G., Kharina M.V., Chekalin V.S. Long-term forecast of agricultural development in Russia based on an economic and mathematical model. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2022. vol. 33. no. 3. pp. 282–292. doi: 10.1134/S1075700722030125.
17. Divya K.L., Mhatre P.H., Venkatasalam E.P., Sudha R. Crop simulation models as decision-supporting tools for sustainable potato production: a review. Potato Research. 2021. vol. 64. no. 3. pp. 387–419. doi: 10.1007/s11540-020-09482-2.
18. Klimentova E.A., Dubovitsky A.A., Beketov A.V. et al. Prospects for regional potato producers in the context of agricultural markets globalization. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 2022. [Online first]. doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2022.02.47.
19. Gordeev R.V., Pyzhev A.I., Zander E.V. Does climate change influence Russian agriculture? Evidence from panel data analysis. Sustainability. 2022. vol. 14. no. 2. article 718. doi: 10.3390/su14020718.
20. Adekanmbi T., Wang X., Basheer S. et al. Climate change impacts on global potato yields: a review. Environmental Research: Climate. 2024. vol. 3. no. 1. article 012001. doi: 10.1088/2752-5295/ad138c.
21.
Review
For citations:
Ozherelyev V.N., Nikitina A.O. Verification of a mathematical model for the territorial distribution of potato farming (case study of Russian regions). Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2026;88(2):20-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2026-2-
JATS XML



























